\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

IG re Strzok: relentless biased comments, no proof of bias

wtf? how much motive of intent does it take for IG to conclu...
rambunctious piazza
  06/15/18
BUT WHAT ABOUT HIS MOTIVE
Cerebral cuckold public bath
  06/15/18
...
Buff idiot
  06/15/18
It's the bureau of investigations not the bureau of proper c...
grizzly racy ladyboy
  06/15/18
...
histrionic place of business casino
  06/15/18
At least this is out there and people are talking about it, ...
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
"although libs seem to believe in other situations that...
rambunctious piazza
  06/15/18
Fortunately we don't need to convince many deranged libs. An...
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
Tcr. These guys find bias and motivation everywhere but not ...
Appetizing soggy state liquid oxygen
  06/15/18
...
talented stubborn meetinghouse
  06/15/18
...
Tantric twinkling uncleanness
  06/15/18
...
soul-stirring wagecucks telephone
  06/16/18
...
fear-inspiring marvelous giraffe
  06/19/18
What specifically did Strzok do in terms of either investiga...
Cerebral cuckold public bath
  06/15/18
https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-c...
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
funny thing: the former term was literally the criminal stan...
rambunctious piazza
  06/15/18
Thinking, non-deranged people can see that, fortunately.
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
"and if the latter term doesn't mean (or entail) the sa...
Lilac stirring parlor queen of the night
  06/15/18
(guy who hasn't explained the distinction at all)
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
idk. Comey and Strzok live inside the world of legal standar...
rambunctious piazza
  06/15/18
The IG doesn't fault the charging decision. You can disagree...
Cerebral cuckold public bath
  06/15/18
How about if it was a judgment call and his judgment was con...
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
for anyone with half a brain, it's obvious that Comey conclu...
rambunctious piazza
  06/15/18
No shit. At least she still lost despite their best efforts....
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
It wasn't ultimately Strozk's call, it was Comey's. Comey sa...
Cerebral cuckold public bath
  06/15/18
CNN could be wrong about the distinction being of legal cons...
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
Then that is an absurdly dumb fucking reading of the law. D...
Hyperactive disgusting dingle berry rigpig
  06/15/18
IG's mandate was to ascertain whether investigative decision...
Razzmatazz selfie principal's office
  06/16/18
it doesn't matter. this is political gold for Trump.
Domesticated blathering turdskin forum
  06/15/18
All anybody will remember is "we'll stop him"
Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate
  06/15/18
trump should be running ads nonstop showing his election nig...
jet area
  06/15/18
...
Thriller station pervert
  06/15/18
Okay poast this idea somewhere that someone who can make tha...
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
bump 4 charles
jet area
  06/15/18
...
house-broken wonderful corner corn cake
  06/15/18
I’m certain we will be seeing much more of that quote.
Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate
  06/15/18
the election ads and campaigning next time are going to be 1...
lascivious know-it-all orchestra pit
  06/16/18
...
fear-inspiring marvelous giraffe
  06/19/18
Let’s just hope the deep state is as free with the benefit o...
sickened newt
  06/15/18
LMAO suuuuuuure
Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate
  06/15/18
...
rambunctious piazza
  06/15/18
Lol at obstruction being Trumps concern
Crimson Bawdyhouse
  06/16/18
It's exactly like comeys public announcement where he roaste...
grizzly racy ladyboy
  06/15/18
so Trump can be biased as fuck but the agencies he controls ...
Motley address bbw
  06/15/18
(brain-damaged PP's 97 IQ in overdrive)
talented stubborn meetinghouse
  06/15/18
This is a promising angle for flame. I would hate to see you...
Sticky titillating psychic yarmulke
  06/15/18
lol
house-broken wonderful corner corn cake
  06/15/18
Imagine you are a prosecutor, or even a civil shittigator, a...
Hyperactive disgusting dingle berry rigpig
  06/15/18
...
grizzly racy ladyboy
  06/15/18
cr this was a ham-handed attempt at damage control. like pat...
jet area
  06/15/18
roll the guillotines
house-broken wonderful corner corn cake
  06/15/18
...
Buff idiot
  06/15/18
...
Godawful box office
  06/15/18
Cr. You don’t need video surveillance to prove the point, th...
Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate
  06/15/18
...
concupiscible really tough guy fanboi
  06/15/18
"Horowitz did a great disservice to this country by int...
Lilac stirring parlor queen of the night
  06/15/18
This wasn’t hearsay bullshit he said “sometime in his career...
Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate
  06/16/18
He’s a moderate, dont pick on him
Buff idiot
  06/16/18
He’s goddamn ridiculous.
Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate
  06/16/18
Horrowitz was not addressing a "typical" argument ...
Hyperactive disgusting dingle berry rigpig
  06/16/18
...
concupiscible really tough guy fanboi
  06/16/18
...
Buff idiot
  06/16/18
...
rambunctious piazza
  06/15/18
Lol at conTURDs
olive aggressive gas station
  06/15/18
Horowitz: actually there clearly was bias but we carefully l...
rambunctious piazza
  06/19/18
...
rambunctious piazza
  06/19/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:48 AM
Author: rambunctious piazza

wtf? how much motive of intent does it take for IG to conclude the obvious? short of Strzok sending a text "I declare that I am doing something improper because I hate Trump," the IG says no impropriety is absolutely proven. it is the IG equivalent of Wolf Blitzer's "we may never know why the jihadist quoting the Quran and screaming 'God is good' as he murdered non-Muslims did what he did."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36250973)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:51 AM
Author: Cerebral cuckold public bath

BUT WHAT ABOUT HIS MOTIVE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36250990)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:52 AM
Author: Buff idiot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36250999)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:52 AM
Author: grizzly racy ladyboy

It's the bureau of investigations not the bureau of proper conclusions

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251000)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:44 PM
Author: histrionic place of business casino



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251384)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:52 AM
Author: Godawful box office

At least this is out there and people are talking about it, and reading between the lines.

Its hard to prove that bias results in some action. But the bias is clear and the actions are clear, and the connection between them is not really provable without an admission (although libs seem to believe in other situations that they can easily tell that bias causes actions with minimal evidence, so....)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251002)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:54 AM
Author: rambunctious piazza

"although libs seem to believe in other situations that they can easily tell that bias causes actions with minimal evidence, so...."

agreed completely. but it's also an issue for all of us. when you see direct proof of passionate bias against someone, you naturally conclude it affects behavior -- except for jihadists and anti-Trumpers, apparently.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251022)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:00 PM
Author: Godawful box office

Fortunately we don't need to convince many deranged libs. And we have a champion who has a pretty fucking strong track record of standing up to their narrative. At this point, many people who were dead set against him are behind him simply because libs are so demonstrably unhinged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251059)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:56 AM
Author: Appetizing soggy state liquid oxygen

Tcr. These guys find bias and motivation everywhere but not here. Just lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251031)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:20 PM
Author: talented stubborn meetinghouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251193)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:28 PM
Author: Tantric twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251694)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:37 AM
Author: soul-stirring wagecucks telephone



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36254939)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2018 1:21 PM
Author: fear-inspiring marvelous giraffe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36272258)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:57 AM
Author: Cerebral cuckold public bath

What specifically did Strzok do in terms of either investigation that you contend was improper?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251041)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:04 PM
Author: Godawful box office

https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html

Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the sources said.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251089)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:09 PM
Author: rambunctious piazza

funny thing: the former term was literally the criminal standard that Comey had decided was not met. and if the latter term doesn't mean (or entail) the same thing, no one has explained why.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251112)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:12 PM
Author: Godawful box office

Thinking, non-deranged people can see that, fortunately.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251137)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:13 PM
Author: Lilac stirring parlor queen of the night

"and if the latter term doesn't mean (or entail) the same thing, no one has explained why."

They're not practicing lawyers. Lay people (including my clients) do that shit all the time assuming that terms and phrases are synonyms when under a particular statute or cases it can mean something entirely different. You can go ahead and attack the decision not to refer it for criminal prosecution, but who cares about the drafting process for Comey's statement.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251146)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:14 PM
Author: Godawful box office

(guy who hasn't explained the distinction at all)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251154)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:16 PM
Author: rambunctious piazza

idk. Comey and Strzok live inside the world of legal standards and it's part of what they've done every day for decades.

and Comey's big cash-out statement was the claim that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute Hillary for the email debacle. how is that not a legal conclusion?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251168)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:17 PM
Author: Cerebral cuckold public bath

The IG doesn't fault the charging decision. You can disagree with the exercise of prosecutorial discretion here but that's a far cry from improper investigation conduct.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251173)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:19 PM
Author: Godawful box office

How about if it was a judgment call and his judgment was controlled by demonstrated overwhelming bias to reach a certain conclusion?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251187)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:26 PM
Author: rambunctious piazza

for anyone with half a brain, it's obvious that Comey concluded that Hillary was too big for the law.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251248)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:28 PM
Author: Godawful box office

No shit. At least she still lost despite their best efforts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251262)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:34 PM
Author: Cerebral cuckold public bath

It wasn't ultimately Strozk's call, it was Comey's. Comey said he needed intentional or willful conduct to prosecute and had no evidence of that. It doesn't actually matter to his conclusion whether you call it careless or negligent because his read of the law, including past prosecutions, was that negligence isn't enough. And DOJ prosecutors weren't bound to follow Comey's recommendation.

Isn't this ultimately a legal disagreement about whether negligence can or should be indictable under this particular statute?

Couldn't Trump's DOJ indict Hillary anyway?

At some point this becomes insane deep state conspiracy mongering.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251306)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:05 PM
Author: Godawful box office

CNN could be wrong about the distinction being of legal consequence. Would you happen to have anything in support of your argument I could read?

It might be Comey's ultimate call, but we're talking about actions by Strzok that stink of coming from biased and not objective analysis.

Per the article above: The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251537)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:39 PM
Author: Hyperactive disgusting dingle berry rigpig

Then that is an absurdly dumb fucking reading of the law. DOJ *constantly* argues for extensions and/or application of the law to fit new fact patterns. True, no case had ever addressed the intentional hiding of a fucking server full of classified information in a bathroom closet.

In what universe would DOJ not prosecute a low level employee for doing this? They would take the case 100/100 times. The fact that every single element may not be a guaranteed slam dunk has never precluded them from aggressively going after people. She should have been prosecuted precisely because she was SOS. She obviously new better, and should be held to the strictest standard as a leader. Instead, a double standard was applied.

Trump's DOJ cannot prosecute Hillary because the OIG just white-washed the entire investigation. They aren't going to revisit it, nor should they at this point. It's over.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251786)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 9:05 AM
Author: Razzmatazz selfie principal's office

IG's mandate was to ascertain whether investigative decisions were defensible, not necessarily whether they were appropriate.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36255506)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:54 AM
Author: Domesticated blathering turdskin forum

it doesn't matter. this is political gold for Trump.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251019)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:58 AM
Author: Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate

All anybody will remember is "we'll stop him"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251043)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:23 PM
Author: jet area

trump should be running ads nonstop showing his election night victory contrasted with the ominous biased FBI texts. everyone needs it beaten into their heads that the federal investigative agency was literally plotting to overturn the results of a free election in the united states.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251209)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:27 PM
Author: Thriller station pervert



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251254)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:29 PM
Author: Godawful box office

Okay poast this idea somewhere that someone who can make that happen will see it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251270)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:32 PM
Author: jet area

bump 4 charles

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251295)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:42 PM
Author: house-broken wonderful corner corn cake



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251362)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:23 PM
Author: Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate

I’m certain we will be seeing much more of that quote.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251651)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:37 PM
Author: lascivious know-it-all orchestra pit

the election ads and campaigning next time are going to be 180^180.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256167)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2018 1:24 PM
Author: fear-inspiring marvelous giraffe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36272283)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 11:58 AM
Author: sickened newt

Let’s just hope the deep state is as free with the benefit of the doubt when they investigate trump for obstruction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251048)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:11 PM
Author: Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate

LMAO suuuuuuure

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251127)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:13 PM
Author: rambunctious piazza



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251139)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 2:01 PM
Author: Crimson Bawdyhouse

Lol at obstruction being Trumps concern

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256452)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:01 PM
Author: grizzly racy ladyboy

It's exactly like comeys public announcement where he roasted Hillary for illegal activity for 15 minutes, in a speech anyone listening to would have seen it building toward indictment, and then at the end he concluded Hillary had no intent completely out of left field and so there was no crime

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251066)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:14 PM
Author: Motley address bbw

so Trump can be biased as fuck but the agencies he controls can't be? is that your argument Trumptards?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251158)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:26 PM
Author: talented stubborn meetinghouse

(brain-damaged PP's 97 IQ in overdrive)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251238)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:40 PM
Author: Sticky titillating psychic yarmulke

This is a promising angle for flame. I would hate to see you ruin it of the gates. Do you want to edit this to make your flame a little more subtle?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251356)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:42 PM
Author: house-broken wonderful corner corn cake

lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251367)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 12:50 PM
Author: Hyperactive disgusting dingle berry rigpig

Imagine you are a prosecutor, or even a civil shittigator, and you have to prove an element of "bias." Then you come across the Strozk/Page texts, including the "we'll stop him" and "insurance policy" texts. On top of it, you see all of the FBI/DOJ working along side Strozk on the investigation are saying they fucking hate Trump, and his supporters are "retards."

I'd be parading those texts around the office celebrating how I just won the case. Outside of a literal admission, there will never be clearer or stronger evidence of bias.

Horowitz did a great disservice to this country by intentionally narrowing the inquiry to bias that could be tied to an individual investigative decision. That is a made up standard designed to white-wash. The issue is whether the people running behind the radar with great power are doing things fairly, professionally, and with some semblance of neutrality. Clearly not here.

Hell, even Mueller agreed. Three people have now been kicked off his team for this shit. How the fuck is DOJ able to reconcile that? They may think that this white-washing puts them back on the path towards repairing their credibility, but it does the opposite.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251429)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:07 PM
Author: grizzly racy ladyboy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251553)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:09 PM
Author: jet area

cr this was a ham-handed attempt at damage control. like paterno saying mistakes were made but we're turning the page and putting procedures in place. not nearly good enough. it's plain to everyone what was really going on.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251571)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:15 PM
Author: house-broken wonderful corner corn cake

roll the guillotines

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251606)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:17 PM
Author: Buff idiot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251620)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:18 PM
Author: Godawful box office



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251626)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:25 PM
Author: Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate

Cr. You don’t need video surveillance to prove the point, there’s ample evidence in front of us already.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251678)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 2:16 PM
Author: concupiscible really tough guy fanboi



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36252075)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 2:33 PM
Author: Lilac stirring parlor queen of the night

"Horowitz did a great disservice to this country by intentionally narrowing the inquiry to bias that could be tied to an individual investigative decision. That is a made up standard designed to white-wash."

No. It's addressing a typical argument raised by defense attorneys to win over juries and attack a prosecutor or cop's motivations. Maybe a cop used racist language sometime in his career. Maybe he was a racist and even had it in for the defendant. But, if there is no evidence that the investigation was improper, or that the evidence showing the defendant to be guilty of the crime was manufactured, then intelligent, objective people should conclude that the personal feelings of the investigator do not have bearing on the merits of the case. Mark Furman may have been a piece of shit, but I don't have any doubt that OJ did it.

Horowitz wasn't afraid to point out the improper behavior of agents and the lack of adherence to protocol in certain situations. But to say that invalidates all of the decisions that went into investigations is ridiculous. Our criminal justice system wouldn't survive such a standard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36252237)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:46 AM
Author: Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate

This wasn’t hearsay bullshit he said “sometime in his career,” he was talking about one of the two key subjects contemporaneous with investigating both subjects. Pull your head out of your ass.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36254963)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:59 AM
Author: Buff idiot

He’s a moderate, dont pick on him

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36255004)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 9:07 AM
Author: Mind-boggling Gay Wizard Karate

He’s goddamn ridiculous.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36255512)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:18 PM
Author: Hyperactive disgusting dingle berry rigpig

Horrowitz was not addressing a "typical" argument made by defense attorneys about historical bias. Strozk et al were making these comments WHILE they were investigating both political parties. You see the difference? This isn't an issue of "dat cop is racist" because he said the n-word in 1979. They were talking about the actual targets of the investigations.

We have an FBI agent that is leading both investigations saying "we're going to stop Trump." By tying the bias issue to a *particular* "investigative decision," the IG created a standard that will never be met. Under this standard, Strozk would have to literally say something like "we're going to stop Trump, therefore I'm going to now subpoena the Trump organization to carry out this plan."

This is laughibly stupid. Compare what actually happened in the two investigations.

In one case, we have a person that was involved in potential criminal conduct (Hillary), because she built a fucking server in her house to store classified data. I.e., the evidence is real and was created as a result of Hillary's own doing. In the other case, the only evidence we have looks to be almost entirely concocted or manipulated by the government's "counter-intelligence" operation, and/or the DNC itself. So then we look at the sum total of Strozk and companies acts: at almost every opportunity they took the most narrow and lenient investigative path with Hillary, but did the opposite with Trump. And of course, these are all people working under an administration that is the same side as Hillary.

So yes, Horrowitz did a great disservice to the country. No one believes that these were fair and unbiased investigations. If the "standard" allows for a different outcome when it is so plainly obvious, then it is a dumb fucking standard.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256118)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 12:27 PM
Author: concupiscible really tough guy fanboi



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256145)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 16th, 2018 1:53 PM
Author: Buff idiot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36256428)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 6:34 PM
Author: rambunctious piazza



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36253568)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 15th, 2018 1:38 PM
Author: olive aggressive gas station

Lol at conTURDs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36251773)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2018 12:16 AM
Author: rambunctious piazza

Horowitz: actually there clearly was bias but we carefully limited what we were talking about.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVdXdtztxjk&feature=youtu.be

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36270028)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 19th, 2018 10:49 AM
Author: rambunctious piazza



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4002739&forum_id=2#36271361)