The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Anyone read the Expert Reports in the Harvard AA case?
| hot infuriating marketing idea | 06/18/18 |
| Hilarious Tanning Salon Trust Fund | 06/22/18 |
| Hilarious Tanning Salon Trust Fund | 06/24/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 18th, 2018 11:57 AM Author: hot infuriating marketing idea Here is the most egregious error in David Card's analysis: "Professor Card includes the personal rating in many of his analyses, despite clear evidence that this rating is affected by racial preferences. Professor Card includes Harvard’s personal rating in his models—notwithstanding the clear finding yielded by my analysis (and that of OIR) that this rating shows strong evidence of racial bias. " |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 1:19 AM Author: Hilarious Tanning Salon Trust Fund He also doesn't separate legacies and recruited athletes from the other applicants. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004647&forum_id=2#36288729) |
Date: June 24th, 2018 2:00 AM Author: Hilarious Tanning Salon Trust Fund (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004647&forum_id=2#36299881) |