\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Anyone read the Expert Reports in the Harvard AA case?

Here is the most egregious error in David Card's analysis: ...
cerebral duck-like associate meetinghouse
  06/18/18
He also doesn't separate legacies and recruited athletes fro...
Charcoal Crawly School Cafeteria Mad-dog Skullcap
  06/22/18
...
Charcoal Crawly School Cafeteria Mad-dog Skullcap
  06/24/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 18th, 2018 11:57 AM
Author: cerebral duck-like associate meetinghouse

Here is the most egregious error in David Card's analysis:

"Professor Card includes the personal rating in many of his analyses,

despite clear evidence that this rating is affected by racial preferences.

Professor Card includes Harvard’s personal rating in his models—notwithstanding

the clear finding yielded by my analysis (and that of OIR) that this rating shows

strong evidence of racial bias. "

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004647&forum_id=2#36265234)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 22nd, 2018 1:19 AM
Author: Charcoal Crawly School Cafeteria Mad-dog Skullcap

He also doesn't separate legacies and recruited athletes from the other applicants.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004647&forum_id=2#36288729)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 24th, 2018 2:00 AM
Author: Charcoal Crawly School Cafeteria Mad-dog Skullcap



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004647&forum_id=2#36299881)