The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Got a motion in limine today without a single cite to a legal standard or casela
| Bearded Swashbuckling Temple Reading Party | 06/22/18 |
| bearded library nibblets | 06/22/18 |
| kink-friendly business firm pozpig | 06/22/18 |
| up-to-no-good stag film partner | 06/22/18 |
| Pink lascivious kitty marketing idea | 06/22/18 |
| Bearded Swashbuckling Temple Reading Party | 06/22/18 |
| Opaque floppy useless brakes macaca | 06/22/18 |
| Mind-boggling Very Tactful Locus Trust Fund | 06/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:09 PM Author: Bearded Swashbuckling Temple Reading Party w in the argument. There is a legal standard section, but none of those rules show up in the argument.
I really don't know where to start. |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:10 PM Author: bearded library nibblets attack the merits with your own case law and provide the standard and why plaintiff never met it, then mention plaintiff provided no legal reason for the relief sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293063) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:12 PM Author: kink-friendly business firm pozpig I make up my own law for MIL all the time. Usually win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293070) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:13 PM Author: up-to-no-good stag film partner Alpha as FUCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293074) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:15 PM Author: Pink lascivious kitty marketing idea (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293095) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:20 PM Author: Bearded Swashbuckling Temple Reading Party Yeah, this is hard. How do I rebut arguments they never made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293113) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:22 PM Author: Opaque floppy useless brakes macaca This is most submissions by shitlawyers in state court.
I got a motion to quash and all there was was a document called "legal brief" which was the lawyer asserting facts that were not of record and with no legal cites.
Best part is the judge saw nothing wrong with it. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:30 PM Author: Mind-boggling Very Tactful Locus Trust Fund 98 percent of this stuff is standard and only is an issue for crucial disputed pieces of evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293164) |