The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Got a motion in limine today without a single cite to a legal standard or casela
| cracking spruce senate | 06/22/18 |
| bossy provocative jew toilet seat | 06/22/18 |
| At-the-ready curious queen of the night | 06/22/18 |
| passionate ungodly coldplay fan | 06/22/18 |
| narrow-minded titillating love of her life | 06/22/18 |
| cracking spruce senate | 06/22/18 |
| Violet Famous Landscape Painting Forum | 06/22/18 |
| Impressive hairraiser foreskin | 06/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:09 PM Author: cracking spruce senate w in the argument. There is a legal standard section, but none of those rules show up in the argument.
I really don't know where to start. |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:10 PM Author: bossy provocative jew toilet seat attack the merits with your own case law and provide the standard and why plaintiff never met it, then mention plaintiff provided no legal reason for the relief sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293063) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:12 PM Author: At-the-ready curious queen of the night I make up my own law for MIL all the time. Usually win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293070) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:13 PM Author: passionate ungodly coldplay fan Alpha as FUCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293074) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:15 PM Author: narrow-minded titillating love of her life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293095) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:20 PM Author: cracking spruce senate Yeah, this is hard. How do I rebut arguments they never made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293113) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:22 PM Author: Violet Famous Landscape Painting Forum This is most submissions by shitlawyers in state court.
I got a motion to quash and all there was was a document called "legal brief" which was the lawyer asserting facts that were not of record and with no legal cites.
Best part is the judge saw nothing wrong with it. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:30 PM Author: Impressive hairraiser foreskin 98 percent of this stuff is standard and only is an issue for crucial disputed pieces of evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293164) |