The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Got a motion in limine today without a single cite to a legal standard or casela
| drunken tanning salon son of senegal | 06/22/18 |
| Light angry mood piazza | 06/22/18 |
| Vigorous Insanely Creepy Indian Lodge | 06/22/18 |
| cream fragrant degenerate library | 06/22/18 |
| Misanthropic hospital sandwich | 06/22/18 |
| drunken tanning salon son of senegal | 06/22/18 |
| Maize goal in life | 06/22/18 |
| umber mildly autistic school cafeteria water buffalo | 06/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:09 PM Author: drunken tanning salon son of senegal w in the argument. There is a legal standard section, but none of those rules show up in the argument.
I really don't know where to start. |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:10 PM Author: Light angry mood piazza attack the merits with your own case law and provide the standard and why plaintiff never met it, then mention plaintiff provided no legal reason for the relief sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293063) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:12 PM Author: Vigorous Insanely Creepy Indian Lodge I make up my own law for MIL all the time. Usually win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293070) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:13 PM Author: cream fragrant degenerate library Alpha as FUCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293074) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:15 PM Author: Misanthropic hospital sandwich (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293095) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:20 PM Author: drunken tanning salon son of senegal Yeah, this is hard. How do I rebut arguments they never made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293113) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:22 PM Author: Maize goal in life This is most submissions by shitlawyers in state court.
I got a motion to quash and all there was was a document called "legal brief" which was the lawyer asserting facts that were not of record and with no legal cites.
Best part is the judge saw nothing wrong with it. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:30 PM Author: umber mildly autistic school cafeteria water buffalo 98 percent of this stuff is standard and only is an issue for crucial disputed pieces of evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293164) |