The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Got a motion in limine today without a single cite to a legal standard or casela
| naked electric furnace | 06/22/18 |
| light twinkling uncleanness degenerate | 06/22/18 |
| Bat-shit-crazy Fear-inspiring Trump Supporter Yarmulke | 06/22/18 |
| mustard elite idea he suggested | 06/22/18 |
| crawly beady-eyed prole | 06/22/18 |
| naked electric furnace | 06/22/18 |
| violent orchid meetinghouse patrolman | 06/22/18 |
| maniacal grizzly personal credit line | 06/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:09 PM Author: naked electric furnace w in the argument. There is a legal standard section, but none of those rules show up in the argument.
I really don't know where to start. |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:10 PM Author: light twinkling uncleanness degenerate attack the merits with your own case law and provide the standard and why plaintiff never met it, then mention plaintiff provided no legal reason for the relief sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293063) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:12 PM Author: Bat-shit-crazy Fear-inspiring Trump Supporter Yarmulke I make up my own law for MIL all the time. Usually win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293070) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:13 PM Author: mustard elite idea he suggested Alpha as FUCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293074) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:15 PM Author: crawly beady-eyed prole (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293095) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:20 PM Author: naked electric furnace Yeah, this is hard. How do I rebut arguments they never made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293113) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:22 PM Author: violent orchid meetinghouse patrolman This is most submissions by shitlawyers in state court.
I got a motion to quash and all there was was a document called "legal brief" which was the lawyer asserting facts that were not of record and with no legal cites.
Best part is the judge saw nothing wrong with it. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:30 PM Author: maniacal grizzly personal credit line 98 percent of this stuff is standard and only is an issue for crucial disputed pieces of evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293164) |