The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Got a motion in limine today without a single cite to a legal standard or casela
| clear telephone wagecucks | 06/22/18 |
| Cheese-eating piazza jap | 06/22/18 |
| Soggy painfully honest cruise ship | 06/22/18 |
| Excitant Bonkers Immigrant Locus | 06/22/18 |
| frum brunch | 06/22/18 |
| clear telephone wagecucks | 06/22/18 |
| milky bateful base goyim | 06/22/18 |
| vivacious fluffy center ratface | 06/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:09 PM Author: clear telephone wagecucks w in the argument. There is a legal standard section, but none of those rules show up in the argument.
I really don't know where to start. |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:10 PM Author: Cheese-eating piazza jap attack the merits with your own case law and provide the standard and why plaintiff never met it, then mention plaintiff provided no legal reason for the relief sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293063) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:12 PM Author: Soggy painfully honest cruise ship I make up my own law for MIL all the time. Usually win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293070) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:13 PM Author: Excitant Bonkers Immigrant Locus Alpha as FUCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293074) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:15 PM Author: frum brunch (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293095) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:20 PM Author: clear telephone wagecucks Yeah, this is hard. How do I rebut arguments they never made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293113) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:22 PM Author: milky bateful base goyim This is most submissions by shitlawyers in state court.
I got a motion to quash and all there was was a document called "legal brief" which was the lawyer asserting facts that were not of record and with no legal cites.
Best part is the judge saw nothing wrong with it. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:30 PM Author: vivacious fluffy center ratface 98 percent of this stuff is standard and only is an issue for crucial disputed pieces of evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293164) |