\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Admit, waitlist or deny this Yale 250?

It can be easy to mistake positive economics for a science w...
kink-friendly dragon
  07/22/18
Admit!
Racy old irish cottage
  07/22/18
...
Marvelous Mustard Skinny Woman Market
  07/22/18
Lmao
snowy sick toaster
  07/22/18
I know right. Huh? What did he just say?
Rambunctious Electric Sneaky Criminal
  07/22/18
He invented a fake scenario then suggests economics ought to...
snowy sick toaster
  07/22/18
not only should is this an obvious deny, this fag's econ deg...
Navy bat-shit-crazy theater
  07/22/18
i took the LSAT 8 years ago but this gave me flashbacks of a...
Vivacious aggressive wrinkle
  07/22/18
...
kink-friendly dragon
  07/22/18
...
kink-friendly dragon
  07/22/18
LJL
Splenetic demanding boiling water bawdyhouse
  07/22/18
That's a ding even for a Cooley 250
fluffy beady-eyed parlor
  07/22/18
...
aphrodisiac school
  07/22/18
...
kink-friendly dragon
  07/22/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:05 AM
Author: kink-friendly dragon

It can be easy to mistake positive economics for a science without values. Its language is mathematics and a formula does not declare if the phenomena it describes is good or bad. However, there is a difference between describing rates of spending or economic growth and attempting to quantify something like human development which is composed of more than just strict economic factors.

On its face, the Human Development Index (HDI) is, like the Gini Index or Consumer Price Index, a silent formula, but closer inspection reveals that value judgements can be written in the language of mathematics.

A country’s HDI is found by taking the geometric mean of three scaled indicators: income per capita, life expectancy, and education. The HDI’s method of aggregating these indicators allows improvements in one indicator to compensate for a decline in another. This substitutability implies that a reduction in life expectancy can be justified by economic growth and also allows the monetary value of human life to be calculated. Doing this calculation makes the troubling suggestion that human life is worth less in poorer countries.

All of this is implicit in the formula’s construction.

Yet, this is not necessarily a flaw in economics or the math that underlies its concepts. In fact, the ability to express a value judgement in a formula is a powerful tool. However, in order to use it responsibly, implicit judgments must be made explicit lest the formula be allowed to dictate our values rather than the other way around.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473443)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:06 AM
Author: Racy old irish cottage

Admit!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473446)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 5:41 PM
Author: Marvelous Mustard Skinny Woman Market



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36476453)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:09 AM
Author: snowy sick toaster

Lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473455)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:10 AM
Author: Rambunctious Electric Sneaky Criminal

I know right. Huh? What did he just say?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473465)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:15 AM
Author: snowy sick toaster

He invented a fake scenario then suggests economics ought to thereby become radically shitlib because hey it's already inherently normative which means literally anything goes utopia tomorrow or violence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473478)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:39 AM
Author: Navy bat-shit-crazy theater

not only should is this an obvious deny, this fag's econ degree should be revoked

nobody is making policy decisions around this retarded index

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473547)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 12:41 AM
Author: Vivacious aggressive wrinkle

i took the LSAT 8 years ago but this gave me flashbacks of a long logical reasoning prompt. still not really sure what this was even about.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36473555)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 10:38 AM
Author: kink-friendly dragon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36474248)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 2:48 PM
Author: kink-friendly dragon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36475496)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 2:55 PM
Author: Splenetic demanding boiling water bawdyhouse

LJL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36475535)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 4:04 PM
Author: fluffy beady-eyed parlor

That's a ding even for a Cooley 250

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36475890)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 4:07 PM
Author: aphrodisiac school



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36475898)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2018 5:26 PM
Author: kink-friendly dragon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4032005&forum_id=2#36476356)