Refresher: Watchmen voted for himself 20+ times in an MPM round (the number of votes was much MUCH higher than any other contest). Lawman8 denied the existence of the Stable of Alts (his own theory). We have not had any other evidence of a 20+ Alt Stable.

This, supposedly from a man of God...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656225)

How about the haters get their story straight? Is sockpuppeting with lots of alts rampant on here, as some claim? Or is the “stable of alts” some paranoid conspiracy theory? You seem to be claiming the latter, but like wack a mole, someone will sprout up and say you idiot, we all know there’s a ton of sockpuppeting that goes on here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656266)

EDIT: I personally took efforts to highlight the abuse and vindicate you. I was shocked when you denied the only 20+ verified Stable we know of.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656270)

Author: are we not all but thai boys (askav)

Interesting. In the first round, he got 21 more votes than you. And that was using all of your alts, too. How do we know that you were using all of your alts? Why, look at the vote totals from the first round.

histogram: https://i.imgur.com/5MND1Aj.png

vote totals from 1st round of MPM 2016:

55

57

43

29

46

36

41

31

35

32

31

36

34

34

38

49

61

44

54

61

48

58

50

58

47

35

34

28

40

36

46

48

84

34

35

44

45

40

40

34

41

41

36

25

35

41

31

39

52

46

31

36

39

37

36

39

41

34

37

43

29

29

36

38

Any of these stand out? Now, I'm no "math guy," so someone correct me if I'm wrong. Is there a reason to suppose vote totals in the first round of MPM would be normally distributed? Is there a reason to think they wouldn't be? histogram suggests a bit of a left skew, but i'm no MFE here.

At any rate, if normally distributed: the mean of these totals is 41, with a fairly tight standard error of 1.3, and a population SD of 10.

Every single outcome in these 64 first round votes is within +2 or -2 SD of the mean. Every one that is, except for WMTP's round.

So which is it? Does WMTP bring just SO MUCH HEAT that he's a >+4SD, 84 vote event? People care THAT MUCH MORE about him in 2016 than they do about Johnsmeyer, Evan, etc.? Or does he have a stable of alts that he uses incessantly and the numbers clearly bear that out?

The bort may never know.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3835483&forum_id=2#34967236)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656443)

With the disclaimer that I forget everything that happened back then, just looking at the post you linked, it is clear that SOMEONE was using a stable of alts to support Watchmen.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656459)

Author: lawman8

This is not the thread the OP is about. I’m talking about my response at the time, which I was proud of, and which you are so upset about.

With the disclaimer that I forget everything that happened back then, just looking at the post you linked, it is clear that SOMEONE was using a stable of alts to support Watchmen.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656459)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656477)

I always provide plenty of links to back my stuff up.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656317)

Does that smell of alt hacking or not?

Sad that you are being a snake and avoiding the question.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656331)

There was a detailed thread at the time. I don’t trust your characterization of what happened. Bring up the thread with the details/supporting evidence, and then I’ll review my response (which I remember being proud of) and will give you an official position right here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656343)

Also, Watchmen had nothing to do with me becoming a mod. It was actually caused by one of my devoted haters.

Your buddy here bumped this thread:

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3838939&mc=4&forum_id=2

You can see that even 9 months ago, I was saying exactly what I’m saying here: bring up the thread. Why can’t you do that??

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4057180&forum_id=2#36656386)