I just need to gain 20 lbs and I'll slingshot up to 350 within a month

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36845756)

how powerless we all are to ignore them or simply satiate them by eating a filling, high-protein, low-calorie meal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840077)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36843807)

Hell world

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840058)

while they correlate to body fat, it's still a disingenuous metric, particularly at the lower range

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840484)

but the "solution" isn't to "accept" them or some retarded lib bullshit. the solution is to turn them into soylent and feed them to farm animals, because fat people are disgusting and useless

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840073)

Also, solution is to try novel approaches. Gut bacteria, hormone shit, give up dairy and other poisons. Also we need far more strict food regulations.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840090)

Or not. Some days she comes home and goes straight to bed, exhausted and dizzy from hunger, shivering in the Kansas heat. She rouses herself around dinnertime and drinks some orange juice or eats half a granola bar. Occasionally she’ll just sleep through the night, waking up the next day to start all over again."

So she sticks to a rigorous diet of crackers and juice?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840078)

You do not end up like this https://www.instagram.com/p/Bm_wzz8B9Us/?hl=en eating 300 calories per day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840166)

.008%

SOURCE: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015"

JFC. so basically we need to treat obesity like an incurable disease vector and take radical steps to prevent it in at-risk patients.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840112)

100%

strange, isn't it? obesity must be a mental disease, defect, or problem if the person doesn't want to be obese and not a physical one

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840519)

Wtf. Did she think there would be a physical fitness component to her getting her degrees?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840127)

liberals are wrong in pretending there is no public health crisis in people's ever increasing obesity

conservatives are wrong to identify the source of the problem with a lack of will power in individual fat people

everyone being fat is a problem, but will power is imaginary. we need to figure out what the fuck is going on, and both sides' attitudes are not conducive to doing that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840151)

Yea peoples bodies are violating the law of thermodynamics

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840176)

Observe an AA or NA meeting, these people CHOSE to stop

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840285)

Sugar tastes good. People eat it in droves because it lights up their brains. And yes in the long run it makes their lives shittier.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36845906)

LMFAO AT NO POINT DURING THIS WEEK COULD THIS FUCKING RETARD DECIDE NOT TO DRIVE 15 MINUTES TO THE STORE TO BUY MORE ICECREAM. UNINTERRUPTED STREAM OF CONSCIOUSNESS FOR 7 FUCKING DAYS WITH THE SOLE INTENTION OF CONSUMING CHILLED COW MILK. MY DOG HAS MORE POWER OF WILL THAN THIS FUCKING LOSER.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840419)

analyzing this in terms of individual choice is nonsensical, though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840208)

it's stupid to try to address the obesity problem by expecting individual obese people to fight the urge to eat. being obese appears to suck in every way and making it a little bit shittier will accomplish nothing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840323)

People in NA and AA were addicts. They quit. That was a choice to quit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840386)

If you tell the people at Narcotics Anonumous that they don’t have the free will to stop, they’ll agree - it’s step 1

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840886)

if you have never experienced the urge to inject heroin, then you will likely ascribe no particular significance to the fact that on a given occasion these processes determined that you continue not to inject heroin. you probably won't think of it as much of a choice

on the other hand, if you have or are feeling the urge, you will ascribe a very different significance to the same outcome. you'll feel that you made the choice to abstain. in a sense, you did.

but your abstinance was not caused by your choice. your sensation of choosing arose from the context in which your abstinence occurred

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840475)

Didn’t shoot heroin because you never shot heroin and don’t have the urge to? That’s becuas of the lack of chemical processes that would demand you shoot heroin.

Ok, but:

Didn’t shoot heroin despite being an addict and having the incredible urge to? That’s because the chemical processes actually didn’t exist for you to shoot heroin, despite the incredible urge you had to shoot heroin.

So again what about everyone who quits? You’re saying that they simply never experienced the chemical processes that require them to shoot heroin after the last time they shot heroin?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840575)

bullshit, they can literally not eat for months

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36843916)

- Life is shit. Food makes it better for some.

- Food is cheap, plentiful, and fattening.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36842733)

That's interesting. When I tried a paleo-variant diet AND STRICTLY FOLLOWED IT FOR OVER A YEAR it had profound effects on my weight and body composition. I could not gain weight despite eating 3000-3400 calories per day, which I METICULOUSLY AND ACCURATELY TRACKED. I then gained weight after adding starches and sugars back into my diet, despite no overall gain in caloric intake.

Dieting also appears to work just fine for the competitive bodybuilders at my gym, who seem to share the common ability to FOLLOW THE DIET. I wonder if there's a theme here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840170)

P.s losing weight through isocaloric substitution of macronutrients is a myth. Your BMR must be 3000-3400+

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840425)

As to your PS, my theory is that calories in minus calories out is not as accurate as calories absorbed minus calories burned, and my digestive system has an easier time absorbing certain macronutrients than others, or was in a healthier position and able to absorb all macronutrients better after coming off the diet. They may be unrelated or confounded by a third factor; I'm simply reporting from the data I gathered.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840501)

she thinks she eats healthy because she eats some vegetables with most meals. however ive watched ehr eat twice as much during a sitting as i do, down 2 glasses of sugar water with it, then snack nonstop during hte day when she's hungry

that's what all fatties are like - they claim they dont eat much during "meals", and for some reason think snacking and drinking calories dont count

bottom line: fatties are disgusting people

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840192)

what the heck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840586)

as the article points out but dances around, we shamed smoking out of public habit.

that said, here's the one true sentence in the article: "Plus, rather obviously, smoking is a behavior; being fat is not."

so maybe we shift focus from shaming people for being fat to shaming them for eating sugar and processed garbage and not exercising. or shaming starbucks for selling retarded leggings-clad cows milkshakes labeled as "coffee."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840364)

And the thing about smoking is it’s disgusting if you smoke even one cigarette. Shaming it is easy. I can eat unhealthily for a day or a week and easily get it under control because I find even a little fatness repulsive. You can’t shame that in the same way you can easily shame smoking.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840417)

we don't need to shame fat people, we need to make them pay the penalties for their behavior, a big one being higher health insurance

yolo. let fats be fats if they choose to be. while i am not above shaming them, i don't think shaming them is a nice thing to do. it is far better than celebrating their fatness, though, like shitlibs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081272&forum_id=2#36840610)