\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Can someone explain significance of Ford being questioned by outside counsel?

why is she so opposed to this versus senators? something lik...
salmon arousing mad-dog skullcap
  09/21/18
Senators are still hamstrung by optics. Counsel isnt
Dull pisswyrm
  09/21/18
She wants the Republican men on the Committee asking the que...
Soul-stirring doctorate messiness
  09/21/18
...
Purple windowlicker community account
  09/21/18
...
trip topaz sound barrier
  09/21/18
are there no women republicans on the judiciary committee? ...
salmon arousing mad-dog skullcap
  09/21/18
there are only like 2 female republicans in the whole senate...
trip topaz sound barrier
  09/21/18
Nope: • Chuck Grassley (Iowa) Chairman • Orrin Hatch (Ut...
Soul-stirring doctorate messiness
  09/21/18
No, there arent any women besides Lindsay Graham on the judi...
Purple windowlicker community account
  09/21/18
To be fair, I don't think Ford is calling her own shots here...
burgundy razzle sanctuary
  09/21/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:17 PM
Author: salmon arousing mad-dog skullcap

why is she so opposed to this versus senators? something like 50% of current senators have a JD, which doesn't necessarily make them cross examination mastermen but still confused about the significance of no outside counsel

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857916)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:18 PM
Author: Dull pisswyrm

Senators are still hamstrung by optics. Counsel isnt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857924)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:19 PM
Author: Soul-stirring doctorate messiness

She wants the Republican men on the Committee asking the questions, not a woman, for maximum victimhood.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857926)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:19 PM
Author: Purple windowlicker community account



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857930)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:20 PM
Author: trip topaz sound barrier



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857934)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:22 PM
Author: salmon arousing mad-dog skullcap

are there no women republicans on the judiciary committee?

didnt anita hill testify before the whole senate?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857945)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:22 PM
Author: trip topaz sound barrier

there are only like 2 female republicans in the whole senate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857954)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:23 PM
Author: Soul-stirring doctorate messiness

Nope:

• Chuck Grassley (Iowa) Chairman

• Orrin Hatch (Utah)

• Lindsey Graham (South Carolina)

• John Cornyn (Texas)

• Mike Lee (Utah)

• Ted Cruz (Texas)

• Ben Sasse (Nebraska)

• Jeff Flake (Arizona)

• Mike Crapo (Idaho)

• Thom Tillis (North Carolina)

• John Kennedy (Louisiana)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857955)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:24 PM
Author: Purple windowlicker community account

No, there arent any women besides Lindsay Graham on the judiciary majority.

Hill testified before the committee, but at the time, I think it was all men on both sides. Also at the time Dems were the majority and so they set the rules.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857962)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:22 PM
Author: burgundy razzle sanctuary

To be fair, I don't think Ford is calling her own shots here. I would imagine she is just going along with what the Dems are pushing for.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857949)