there's some great content on there and everybody speaks freely

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38719831)

The fact that gab is now decentralized and can’t be taken down is also amazing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38719841)

it's really refreshing to see everybody able and willing to speak frankly about issues publicly, instead of the weird, awkwardly "coded" discourse that thought criminals are forced (?) to adhere to in twitter and other normieland mediums

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38719878)

https://gab.com/Heartiste

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38720039)

Gab and Bitcoin are showing the way forward

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38719968)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4315858&mc=71&forum_id=2

Libs will fully control the federal government and that’s how they’ll take down Gab. It will be added to the list of banned websites due to spreading dangerous ideologies directly resulting in mass violence and slaughter

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38719983)

Bitcoin is a great analogy. No government can end it, but if they wanted to ban all exchanges and criminalize possession, they would effectively take out 99% of its potential. That’s what will happen to Gab and all dissident websites with truly free speech under the next Dem

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38720066)

“The 1619 Project is a major initiative from The New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding, and placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of the story we tell ourselves about who we are.”

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/1619-america-slavery.html

So that’s the point. The constitution itself is racist and built on slavery. It will be a good thing when we move on from this oppressive concept. You already know that 95% of people are NPCs and will unquestionably accept this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38720264)

I'm pretty sure Gab is only "decentralized" in that anyone can run their own Gab/Mastodon server and interact with content on Gab.com. If you run your own Gab/Mastodon server, you're not mirroring the content on Gab.com

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38720760)

Also, the whole "make it a crime just to access it, or otherwise create a ton of compelling reasons not to use it" is a total cop out. There are already a ton of compelling reasons not to use it (even if you limit them to social opprobrium).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38722469)

If this website still exists in its current form (as it has for many years) by the end of the next Dem President’s first term, I will be conclusively proven wrong and you can call BS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38722506)

I appreciate that you are trying to add identifiable contours to your prediction, and I think that criminalization or some concrete governmental punishment is less than 1% likelihood, but the other shit could happen under Trump or any Republican just as easily, without any governmental action at all.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38722550)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4315858&mc=71&forum_id=2

It will be government action and only under a Dem

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38722665)

Edit: They all signed onto a unanimous opinion stating the following just a couple years ago:

"Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express "the thought that we hate." United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644, 655, 49 S.Ct. 448, 73 L.Ed. 889 (1929) (Holmes, J., dissenting)."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38722794)

gab is a refuge for non-brainwashed people to be able to speak freely among themselves. i don't think anybody cares anymore about proselytizing to braindead white normies to "join our cause." who gives a shit about these people, i don't want to live in a society with them anyway

if and when any of those people snap out of their brainwash, it's not hard for them to find us

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38720287)

(utter fucking retard)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38721733)

torba's gab is also interesting -- gab.com/a

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4327740&forum_id=2#38720096)