No matter the circumstance, libs will always support the criminal and will always conclude that the victim deserved it. They do not want the criminal to serve one day in prison, and want the victim (or, if the victim is dead, the victim’s family) to suffer the rest of their lives because of their privilege.

That’s what we’re up against: demented, satanic libs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40984318)

All libs think anything a white guy does is rape, while all rape committed by minorities is fine

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40984365)

This freak of a lawyer is upset because she and others may not be able to kill their babies up to birth(she would likely prefer a killing option up until a year or two after birth). Only extremists support this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40994754)

and he's a cheater

and he's a bigot

and he's a sexist

and he's an idiot

and he's horrible with actually managing any business.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40984734)

(When you’re trapped inside yourself, cut off from the light, what else but wailing and knashing of teeth can ensue?)

It’s something we all struggle with, which is why we have to constantly compare our self-image with the actual environment we are creating around us, lest we become a solipsistic liberal.

(By their fruits you will know them, as Jesus, the teacher of sanctified common sense, reminds us. We lose touch with God, we lose touch with common sense: it’s that simple.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40993951)

Of course, much like our republic probably will, he succumbed as a aids riddled bag of bones in san Francisco

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40984394)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Bataille

Bataille was into hardcore dionysian shit and aztec blood sacrifice. Compare his (wiki pasta) concept of base materialism to our sjw corporate religion of today:

Base materialism Edit

Bataille developed base materialism during the late 1920s and early 1930s as an attempt to break with mainstream materialism, which he viewed as a subtle form of idealism.[12] He argues for the concept of an active base matter that disrupts the opposition of high and low and destabilises all foundations. In a sense the concept is similar to Baruch Spinoza's neutral monism of a substance that encompasses both the mind and the matter posited by René Descartes; however, it defies strict definition and remains in the realm of experience rather than rationalisation. Base materialism was a major influence on Derrida's deconstruction, and both thinkers attempt to destabilise philosophical oppositions by means of an unstable "third term." Bataille's notion of materialism may also be seen as anticipating Louis Althusser's conception of aleatory materialism or "materialism of the encounter," which draws on similar atomist metaphors to sketch a world in which causality and actuality are abandoned in favor of limitless possibilities of action.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40989567)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40989571)

FTFY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4632981&forum_id=2#40984451)