Could a DEM Senator decide to just ignore SEN votes of small GOP states?
| Beady-eyed Prole Indian Lodge | 10/22/21 | | burgundy business firm | 10/22/21 | | Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse | 10/22/21 | | Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse | 10/22/21 | | Beady-eyed Prole Indian Lodge | 10/22/21 | | avocado jap public bath | 10/22/21 | | Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse | 10/22/21 | | shaky wine voyeur stead | 10/22/21 | | Beady-eyed Prole Indian Lodge | 10/22/21 | | Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse | 10/22/21 | | Wonderful aquamarine potus haunted graveyard | 10/23/21 | | Shimmering Exciting Windowlicker Locus | 10/22/21 | | Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse | 10/22/21 | | Shimmering Exciting Windowlicker Locus | 10/23/21 | | Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse | 10/23/21 | | Shimmering Exciting Windowlicker Locus | 10/23/21 | | Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse | 10/23/21 | | Shimmering Exciting Windowlicker Locus | 10/24/21 | | thriller mood | 10/23/21 | | Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse | 10/23/21 | | charismatic sexy dog poop center | 10/22/21 | | overrated liquid oxygen senate | 10/23/21 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 22nd, 2021 12:46 PM Author: Beady-eyed Prole Indian Lodge
* I meant a DEM majority Senate
Its raciss the way Senate contructed. They ignore votes from South Dakota etc. Political question so SC doesnt interfere?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4947540&forum_id=2#43313895) |
Date: October 22nd, 2021 12:49 PM Author: Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse
if you read the Constitution, the one thing that literally CANNOT be amended is the equal representation of states in the Senate. So flouting that seems to rise to a clear issue of Constitutional interpretation
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that [...] no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4947540&forum_id=2#43313913) |
|
Date: October 23rd, 2021 9:36 PM Author: Odious topaz antidepressant drug whorehouse
> If the senate doesn’t exist then all the states would certainly have equal suffrage in the senate.
Your statement contains a straight logical self-contradiction. You can't have equal suffrage, or any form of suffrage, in a non-entity, a non-existent institution, a zero, a nothing. It has to exist in some form, even if it's a hollowed out shell, in order to have equal suffrage in it. This seems like a really basic point to me. "equal suffrage in X" presumes the existence of X. If X doesn't exist, you can't have equal suffrage in X. If you think otherwise, you're just playing games with words without connecting them to reality.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4947540&forum_id=2#43320986) |
|
|