Author: lonelyvirgin

This e-mail will be dispatched to the entire YLS faculty within the next five minutes. I've assembled a

spreadsheet with their addresses and every single one of them will be notified about what our darling little

Heide has done. I post this here as a warning to all those who would try to regulate the more antisocial

posters- we have the power now.

-----------------------

Dear Yale Law faculty,

I write to you now about a very important issue that affects a non-trivial number of you. Although you

undoubtedly deal with self-entitled, spoiled students on a regular basis, there�s one person in particular

whose history I feel you must be made aware of before problems arise. Heide Iravani, a student in your 09

class, has a felon as a father who stole money from the World Bank to buy her horses. I kid you not, she

asked her father for horses so he took money from an organization aimed at helping the poor. Just imagine

how hard she must have begged him in order to commit such an odious crime. One could make the

argument that her character at ten is not representative of her values as an adult, if it wasn�t for the recent

evidence to the contrary. She spent in excess of $150 to remove material that was in the public domain,

simply because she found it offensive that it emphasized her good looks. If such reckless use of money in

the name of free speech suppression is not indicative of a damaged character, I don�t know what it is. Best

of luck to you in managing this liability, it is regretful that the admissions process can�t encapsulate the

entire person.

XOXO

HTH

Patrick Bateman (Harvard Law School 08)

References:

http://www.unc.edu/news/archives/apr04/udall042604.html

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-915261.html

http://abcnews.go.com/US/print?id=2912364

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592608&forum_id=2#7729592)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum;_id=2#19215405)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5154742&forum_id=2#45260359)

Author: lonelyvirgin

Dear Yale Law faculty,

As you may or may not be aware, there is a lawsuit underway whose plaintiffs (represented by the epitome of kikes, David Rosen) are two of your students. Here is a copy of their claims:

http:llonline.wsj.codpubiclresources/documenta~omplaiut.p

To be fair to the posters whose identities are going to be exposed, these are the names of the plantiffs: Doe I = 'Brittan Heller', Doe II = 'Heide Iravani'. If you can't put a face to those names, just remember: Brittan Heller is barely capable of reading (159 LSAT) and Heide Iravani ...well, she has big fake titties.

Should you take a look at the claims, you'll see this is an obvious case of people getting bent out of shape because free speech sometimes hurts. Why your colleagues thought this was worthy of wasting everyone's time is beyond me. My own pet theory is that Mr. Rosen has recently found two talented knob gobblers to take care of business for him, in exchange for "pro bono" work. I can't blame him for trying to exploit their predicament, but it seems like the risk of contracting herpes from Brittan Heller would convince any rational person to go to a prostitute first. As for Heide Iravani, who wants that litigious cunt holding a sexual harassment lawsuit over their head?

I encourage you all to speak out against your intemperate colleagues who are trying to destroy fellow members of the legal community.

Sincerely,

The same d00d who wrote the first Heide Iravani e-mail

P.S.-

To Mr. Rosen and his feministldyke allies-don't bother trying to find out who wrote this e-mail. As much as you like to think people can be held accountable for what they say, this is not the reality on the internet. I did get some serious lulz thinking about what type of claims you'd include in a lawsuit against me. Alas, three layers of anonymous proxies and a wireless access point ensure this suit will remain within the realm of fantasy land. Good thing too, because god knows I don't want to cut back on models and bottles.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5154742&forum_id=2#45260364)

Author: .,.,..,,,.,..,.,.,,,,.,.,.,...,,.,.,,,.,....,

and the AK47 letter was still to come...

I've been advised to protect myself from Brittan Heller, Heide Iravani, and their cadre of elite lawyers by using the Internet. Thus, I am currently in the process of creating a website that I will use to track the litigation, step by step, until its resolution. The website wil detail all the allegations and allegedly harmful comments in the case, and will feature the actual names of Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani as well as information pertaining to why they are suing me, and so on. Since none of the allegations, accusations, or allegedly harmful comments have been tested yet in court or otherwise proven false, I will ask for comments on whether such allegedly harmful comments are true or have any merit. The website will be publicly viewable, obviously, and in order to reach a maximally large audience, I will send a link to Yale students as well as other university students. A link to the site will also be posted on Autoadmit.com, the site that stared this whole mess. A mirror site will be created, too, as is customary when a site achieves too much traffic.

(Autoadmit's mirror site is Xoxohth.com.) A blog will also be established for the site. As any person familiar with the operation and creation of web sites will attest, blogs are very easy to create and maintain, and there are hundreds of free blog providers and free website providers for persons interested in airing their views to the public. Two obvious provides are Google, which provides GooglePages (which, incidentally, is where certain posters attacked Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani on the "T14 contest" site, which led Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to fie this suit - note that the website I intend to create will not intentionally disparage Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani in any way, but wil rather ask the public for comment into whether any of the comments posted by the anonymous defendants are true or have any merit, as well as accept general comments and opinions of the girls from classmates, friends, and other observers in an effort to build any possible defense to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani, and

blogger.com, which provides a free blog-creation service. Again, I was not involved in any way with the websites or emails created or sent by the anonymous defendants.

Creating and managing the site is well within my First Amendment rights. Any action to silence, harass or coerce me into taking the site down will be met by an appropriate anti-SLAPP motion which, as I'm sure you know, protects speakers from "strategic" suits designed to silence criticism and/or public speech. The protections provided by the anti-SLAPP laws are especially strong where the speech pertains to a matter currently under review in a judicial proceeding, and thus applies to speech pertaining to suit brought by Heide Iravani and Brittan Heller. Such a motion also entitles me to attorney's fees incured in the process. An anti-SLAPP suit may also be pursued to recover attorney's

fees already incurred as a result of this suit. As you know, Connecticut doesn't currently have Anti-SLAPP legislation, but Californa - i.e., where the Subpoena was executed does, as do many other states. To date, this horrible case has cost me several thousand dollars in legal fees and related costs.

My intent is not to further harm Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani. As I stated above, I recognize that these women have experienced some emotional difficulty as a result of their lives being publicly scrutinized and criticized on Autoadmit.com and other websites. However, if I am going to be sued by these young women for making a frivolous, non-threatening, nonactionable, innocuous and constitutionally protected comment on a website -- i.e.,

"Women named Jill and Heide should be raped," then I think it fair to create a site that details all the claims put fort against me and my co-defendants. I have no way of

knowing whether the anonymous defendants' comments concerning Heide's criminality and sexual deviancy are accurate, and a site that details all the allegations and

accepts comments from persons that know Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani would be a good place to examine those comments.

There is also another reason for the site. Since Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's suit puts forth all sorts of extraordinary claims, and since I have no idea whether Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani are as sexually loose or bigoted as the anonymous Defendants' claimed on the site, I wil need evidence to support a "truth" defense to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's allegations. And since, apparently, it is extraordinarily easy to obtain a subpoena, I will be pursuing the following subpoenas (note that one or more of the following items can easily be obtained through an alternative discovery tool):

1) A subpoena for information pertaining to the size of Heide Iravani's breasts and whether such breasts, as alleged by one Defendant, are "fake"

2) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani are indeed "universally hated" by their peers

3) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani have any sexually transmitted diseases, including Herpes

4) Information pertaining to the law firms that interviewed Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani, and why such firms decided not to hire Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani

5) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller did indeed achieve a score of 159 on the LSAT

6) Information pertaining to Heide Iravani's religion - i.e., Islam - and information from any Muslim peers that may be able to shed any light on this case (this information may be a bit difficult to get, but local mosques would be a good place to send information requests or, if necessary, subpoenas)

The above information requests and subpoenas wil be sent to YLS students, faculty, friends and family of Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to the extent they are able to be located, as well as anyone else who knows Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani and would be able to provide such information. Whenever I make an information request, I will state exactly what the request is for, whom it concerns, and why I am seeking it. I will use Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's true names, for without their true names, the information requests will be completely useless. As I

stated above, my purpose here is not to hurt Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani; my purpose is to defend myself. However, I think it safe to say some of the information would be harmful to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani. This brings to mind the unfortunate situation that Robert Steinbuch

found himself in - i.e., having to deal with numerous embarrassing revelations - when he brought a defamation lawsuit against one Jessica Cutler not too long ago.

The critical question, I think, for Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to consider is whether having to deal with such a site and blog is wort "uncovering" the identity of a person who merely said that he thinks "Women named Jill and Heide should be raped." It is especially unfortunate that these words were the only negative words I ever wrote concerning either ¡DOE III or (DOE II . Again, I am not a lawyer, and due to my lack of legal expertise, these subpoenas and other discovery tools are the only things I believe I can do to defend myself against this lawsuit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1630519&forum;_id=2#19287295)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5154742&forum_id=2#45260366)