🚨 FANI DISQUALIFIED FROM TRUMP GA ELECTION CASE 🚨
| adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Claret native yarmulke | 03/15/24 | | ruby provocative shrine | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | ruby provocative shrine | 03/15/24 | | 180 light whorehouse gaming laptop | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | federal wonderful site | 03/15/24 | | comical cuck | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | ruby provocative shrine | 03/15/24 | | federal wonderful site | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | fiercely-loyal friendly grandma point | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | fiercely-loyal friendly grandma point | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | racy hateful foreskin stage | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | cerise fat ankles striped hyena | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | cerise fat ankles striped hyena | 03/15/24 | | ruby provocative shrine | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | racy hateful foreskin stage | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | lascivious chapel | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | ruby provocative shrine | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | silver stead | 03/15/24 | | 180 light whorehouse gaming laptop | 03/15/24 | | racy hateful foreskin stage | 03/15/24 | | racy hateful foreskin stage | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | ruby provocative shrine | 03/15/24 | | Pale Idiot | 03/15/24 | | adventurous hairless double fault codepig | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | fiercely-loyal friendly grandma point | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | silver stead | 03/15/24 | | Green Meetinghouse | 03/15/24 | | Crystalline center | 03/15/24 | | Fragrant drab base toilet seat | 03/15/24 | | silver stead | 03/15/24 | | lascivious chapel | 03/15/24 | | Appetizing piazza | 03/15/24 | | Pea-brained resort | 03/15/24 | | Vermilion idea he suggested party of the first part | 03/15/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:24 AM Author: Green Meetinghouse
this seemed to be inevitable based on the judge's dismissal of a handful of counts yesterday. no reason he would have done that if he was about to DQ the prosecutor.
cons were pissing and shitting themselves with glee about how the dismissal was a horrible development for the state, etc.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496005) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:56 AM Author: federal wonderful site
I dunno. This sets up a huge shitstorm when Fani refuses to resign her office from the case or to fire Wade.
The order literally said there was an appearance of impropriety and that they lied about their relationship
Going to be 1800000 to see what this bitch decides to do (my local county DA by the way)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496085) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:16 AM Author: Green Meetinghouse
i disagree. haen't read yet, but didn't the judge find that he had to conclude that there was an actual conflict and not the appearance of one, in order to DQ?
i remember from the closing arguments that this is an open question in GA case law. if it ultimately is the case that an appearance of a conflict is enough, then a guilty finding could get tossed on appeal.
i doubt there is any way that Ds can appeal now, though.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496161)
|
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:49 AM Author: Green Meetinghouse
wtf are you talking about? that is not what i'm saying. is this spaceporn?
i am assuming (i am going only on news reports as i haven't read the decision and doubt that i will) that the judge concluded that appearance of a conflict is not sufficient for DQ, which is an open question under GA case law. although he found the appearance of a conflict, he let her office remain on the case. if he had reached a different legal conclusion, her office would be removed from the case to be either reassigned to a different prosecutor's office in the state, or withdrawn altogether.
i'd expect that if GA scotus finds that the judge committed legal error here (on the ground that appearance of conflict is enough), the entire proceeding is void and no convictions resulting from it can stand. i don't see how they'd conclude that the judge should have removed willis's entire office from the case, but it's nbd because they removed wade and that's good enough. put another way, if the appearance of conflict is enough for DQ, then removing wade after the fact doesn't seem to cure that.
what you are saying is that there is no remedy for this if the GA supreme court disagrees with him and holds that the appearance of a conflict is enough. that doesn't seem right.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496259) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:37 AM Author: Fragrant drab base toilet seat
lol, confirmed non-lawyer.
if you think there's a scintilla of a chance that a state court is going to convict and imprison and major party candidate in a trial set to begin 3 months before an election, you are delusional. do you know how the sentencing phase, appellate process, and the time between conviction and actually going to jail works? of course not, you're just jerking off and living in a fantasy world.
even in the very edge case scenario where the prosecution convicts trump before the election, it is literally impossible for him to be sentenced in incarcerated by the election. that's just not how it works. certainly not for a fucking major party candidate who is dominating the polls. you're stupid or crazy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496218) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:52 AM Author: Fragrant drab base toilet seat
if you think a state is going is going to be able to incarcerate the fucking president-elect you are fucking insane.
if trump loses he's just citizen trump. but if he wins he will not be going to fucking prison, you literal moron. you think scotus is going to be like "oh yeah, totally fine that every state has the independent authority to imprison the president-elect." you probably thought the colorado ballot case was going to go your way too.
don't you see how fucking stupid this would be? like, aside from trump, just as a policy? just do let wyoming make it a felony to be named "joe biden" and send him to jail.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496273) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 3:06 PM Author: Fragrant drab base toilet seat
SCOTUS doesn't have authority over canada. SCOTUS does have authority over states is a variety of ways. states do not possess the power to do everything. see e.g. the colorado ballot access decision.
scotus compels states to do shit all the time. the constitution is the supreme law of the land. scoutus would only surely decide that the impeachment provisions in the constitution are the sole way of removing a president from power, and that any state action to the contrary is unconstitutional. for obvious reasons.
like, how can you say "herp derp it's just like candada" after scotus JUST compelled a state to do something regarding the president. and opinion talked at length at how insane it would be for every state to independently determine whether a candidate is qualified. this would go even beyond that. clinton v. jones already established immunity for criminal on civil suits while in office. the same rational could easily be extended to the president-elect. and, as a practical matter, how tf is georgia gonna force president-elect trump to report to prison anyway? send georgia police to dc to arrest him before he's inaugurated?
this is all such retarded bullshit. i would say you're flaming, but you delusional tds fags have proven you exist beyond rational thinking.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47497083) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:50 AM Author: Fragrant drab base toilet seat
it's beside the point anyone. a president-elect could be dead to rights to a state felony, it doesn't mater. states are not going to be granted ANY independent power to remove a president. incarcerating him is removal. hypothetically, if a president was IN JAIL and got elected, he would be allowed to leave, serve, and return. the qualifications for president are in the constitution. the process for removing a president are in the constitution. they purposefully did not include "not a felon" for this very reason. if the people choose to elect a felon that is their right.
i don't know why these fucking libs are so gung-ho to destroy democracy, you know, the thing that they constantly accuse trump of. let the people make their choice. if they want to elect trump despite everything, they should be able to. that's democracy. they're trying everything they can to keep him out of office beyond, you know, putting up a candidate that would beat him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496466) |
Date: March 15th, 2024 2:04 PM Author: Pea-brained resort
Interesting video from 2020:
https://cdn.videy.co/YsQHjfY0.mp4
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496818) |
Date: March 15th, 2024 3:35 PM Author: Vermilion idea he suggested party of the first part
You read the opinion and then see the judge would have allowed Wade to stay on the case. jfc. Good enough for Georgia, I guess.
I hope there is an option for an appeal or at least a writ. The appellate judges should read McAfee's opinion and say "if that's not good enough to bump a prosecutor in Georgia then we are all fucked. Reversed."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47497225) |
|
|