https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/30/01/83053491-13254081-Former_Central_Valley_High_School_teacher_McKenna_Kindred_is_see-a-6_1711760947402.jpg

she probably just wanted a BBC

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47538441)

he prob wanted a BBC too

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47538807)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47538488)

oh the trauma these hot teachers cause on their poor male students

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541144)

the US is furking retarded jfc, niggas and bitches can do whtever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47538977)

She said Kindred's actions were an 'abuse of power' and that she started to 'groom' him when he was 16.

'A light he used to carry has been dimmed,' she said.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47539056)

That is so fucking hot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47539084)

the kid was the one who initiated messaging her outside of school and it was clearly 100% consensual. this guy's mom is a psychopathic bitch and is ruining a person's life for no reason

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47539105)

theyre mentally retarded, all the stuff libs talk about: no fully formed frontal cortex, etc. they make really bad decisions and get emotionally fucked up by the consequences.

if i had a 16yo kid who fucked some 16yo girl, well... that seems developmentally appropriate. Hope they dont get preggo and things will probably be just fine.

But fucking a teacher? I think (even as I anticipate being called a lib or faggot) that is not good for the kid. Rumors spread, it impacts his relationships with peer girls, he likely cannot deal with the adult woman's insanity, he's getting poisoned by shrew shit when he should be enjoying the ripeness of young girlhood, flirting and fumbling awkardly through grabbing tits and such. Not having some bitter wine shrew order him "lick my pussy" and lecture about "the female orgasm".

Gross. She should go to prison

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47539179)

but everyone on xo has like 7yos at most except for me, epah, oldhls and perish.

theyre all still thinking of it as if they were the kid getting laid, not as the parent of the kid. its just an age thing

i want my kid to fall in love with some 17yo virgin cheerleader and lay her the summer before senior year in a backseat when i think he's with football friends etc etc, not go down on some 34yo married dry pussy and get all kinds of neuroses when she inevitably gets fired and divorced

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47540096)

can't wait for your "son" to lose his virginity to some obese mystery meat goblina on SSRIs while you hand-wring about how immoral it is for attractive white people to have sex with each other

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47540119)

fucking some mentally ill married shrew when youre a healthy teenage high schooler is 120, and having a hot girlfriend in your same school is 180.

if you'd had the latter, you'd spend less time masturbating to fantasies of the former.

to hell with porny shrews.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47540134)

The 25-year-old being the 17-year-old's teacher shouldn't make any difference, other than firing them from their teaching job. Imagine if the teacher had resigned right before having sex with the student - then it would be perfectly legal in most places? Then firing them with no further punishment achieves the same outcome as if they had gone the legal route of resigning first, then fucking the 17-year-old.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47539752)

i'm perfectly fine with making it a crime for a teacher to use their position as a way of coercing a student to engage in sexual activity.

but absent a showing of that, why would it make sense to criminalize behavior legal for everyone else?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47539825)

You can argue for whatever penalty you want; all I'm saying is that them being teacher and student shouldn't make any difference to the criminal penalty. The difference between "this is a crime resulting in prison time" and "this is perfectly legal" should not come down to "did the teacher resign before fucking the student?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541662)

I should’ve added the caveat that more than likely a 17 year old girl who fucks a handsome 25 year old teacherbro is pretty likely to be BPD. And if she’s BPD then it’s a different story and the 25 teacherdude is gross (though it’s probably a pretty intense experience to be confronted with lol). But a not clinically diagnosed and attractive 17 year old girl who fucks a 25 year old teacher is 100% completely consensual. And it’s not unheard of either, see eg Election (the movie with Reese Witherspoon). Teacher is a gross old man, but part of the point is that student and her mom are pieces of shit. She’s much less impulsive and stupid from horniness and she can fuck literally whoever she wants, and obviously gets off on the fact that she’s so irresistible to this person who should know better and she has the power to ruin his life whenever she loses interest.

14 year old girl fucking a teacherbro is way worse ie odds are basically 100% certain that she’s been molested and/or abandoned and she has a dysfunctional prefrontal cortex and a giant stew of brain-glitching hormones going on. An adult who takes advantage of that deserves 20 years behind bars.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541683)

https://kcengland.com/blog/mckenna%20brown

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47539191)

https://www.poerkan.com/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47540697)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Fichter

Can we all agree that it's batshit insane that you can get 22 years in prison for doing something that's legal in 38 states (and that most likely resulted in nothing but extremely fond memories for the "victims")

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541669)

These people make up "our" juries btw. The majesty of the law, folks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541677)

Pick one (you don't seem too sharp, so let me help you out: it's the second option). Either way, there's a serious problem.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541682)

okay, so you think it's the first option (but aren't man enough to come out and say so)?

assume for the sake of argument that it's not wrong to lock people up for decades for fucking a 17-year-old. that strongly suggests that fucking a 17-year-old is a horrendous offense deserving of severe punishment. in that case, the laws of 38 states and almost all other western countries currently allow for people to commit a horrendous offense. I think most people would agree that it's obviously wrong for the laws to allow that.

did this help: [ ] yes [ ] no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541700)

you can't resolve moral debates by appealing to laws or to how many people believe what. you need to make arguments relating to things like consent, duty of care etc, harm.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541703)

1. it's wrong for the state to imprison people for decades who haven't done something horrendously wrong

2. it's wrong for the state to not criminalize a horrendously wrong action

3. fucking a 17-year-old is a horrendously wrong action

4. fucking a 17-year-old is not a horrendously wrong action

1 and 2 seem uncontroversial, and either 3 or 4 has to be true. so with either 1&4 or 2&3, you can conclude that many states' governments are doing something wrong here.

I didn't say anything about "how many people believe what" so I don't know what you're trying to say.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541721)

making the case for 4 over 3 would be a completely different argument. you'd have to discuss the neurological development of 17-year-olds, the question of to what extent it makes a difference that a teacher-student relationship existed, etc.

I wasn't attempting to make the case for 4 over 3, hence why I never mentioned any of that stuff. As for my original statement that you started out attacking, "it's batshit insane that you can get 22 years in prison for doing something that's legal in 38 states" - I thought it was clear that I was making a point about the massive inconsistency, but I can see how you thought I was appealing to the legality in 38 states to justify the claim that it shouldn't be a crime in the other 12 states.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541792)

Real talk, she’s a subjective 9.5/10 physically for me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510978&forum_id=2#47541716)