There's no way she didn't know she would die if she left her alone for 10 days.

So it occurred to me that she might have been absolutely sick of having a dependent small human waking her up at night, bothering her throughout the day, screaming her head off and not giving her a minute of peace and quiet. So this was the perfect way to get rid of her. Of course, for a low IQ retard like her who didn't think that security cameras would blow her cover.

I would go insane too, this is why I'm not having kids ever. But I'm pretty sure my IQ is a lot higher, I did not bring a kid into the world and then got myself locked up. I know how contraceptives work.

I'm curious to learn how many people can handle this well. I've heard about parental burnout, but do you ever just wish the kid fucking died?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47539831)

I've asked all my friends and cousins with children if they ever smack/hurt their kids.

They ALL, even the nicest ones, answered that it was nearly impossible to not lose your mind and do it at least several times during certain stages.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47539835)

not stupid

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47539860)

Imagine asking: "Where's your baby"? A: "Oh, I gave her away, I didn't want her." It would be social suicide.

During the interviews she claimed the baby refused to eat and died because SHE herself did not want to eat. That was her plan. Just starving her and claiming she refused the food. This was not on her based on the low IQ thinking.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47539914)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47539883)

My father got fucked by a financial crisis and he'd say often how much he regretted having kids.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47540033)

Shitty kike lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47540060)

Kike

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47540076)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide

Infanticide (or infant homicide) is the intentional killing of infants or offspring. Infanticide was a widespread practice throughout human history that was mainly used to dispose of unwanted children,[1]: 61  its main purpose being the prevention of resources being spent on weak or disabled offspring. Unwanted infants were usually abandoned to die of exposure, but in some societies they were deliberately killed. Infanticide is broadly illegal, but in some places the practice is tolerated, or the prohibition is not strictly enforced.

Most Stone Age human societies routinely practiced infanticide, and estimates of children killed by infanticide in the Mesolithic and Neolithic eras vary from 15 to 50 percent. Infanticide continued to be common in most societies after the historical era began, including ancient Greece, ancient Rome, the Phoenicians, ancient China, ancient Japan, Pre-Islamic Arabia, Aboriginal Australia, Native Americans, and Native Alaskans.

Infanticide became forbidden in Europe and the Near East during the 1st millennium. Christianity forbade infanticide from its earliest times, which led Constantine the Great and Valentinian I to ban infanticide across the Roman Empire in the 4th century. Yet, infanticide was not unacceptable in some wars, and infanticide in Europe reached its peak during World War II (1939–45), during the Holocaust and the T4 Program.[2] The practice ceased in Arabia in the 7th century after the founding of Islam, since the Quran prohibits infanticide. Infanticide of male babies had become uncommon in China by the Ming dynasty (1368–1644), whereas infanticide of female babies became more common during the One-Child Policy era (1979–2015). During the period of Company rule in India, the East India Company attempted to eliminate infanticide but were only partially successful, and female infanticide in some parts of India still continues. Infanticide is very rare in industrialised countries but may persist elsewhere.

Parental infanticide researchers have found that mothers are more likely to commit infanticide.[3] In the special case of neonaticide (murder in the first 24 hours of life), mothers account for almost all the perpetrators. Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.[4]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47542390)

i learned recetnly that women are responsible for like 90% of post-birth deaths in children looooooll

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47542399)

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

Fatherly cases of neonaticide are so rare that they are individually recorded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47542423)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47542425)

I’ve said many times before on XO that whether you have shitty kids or not involves a lot of luck (or you can call it genetics if you prefer, but it can also be a nurture issue when you don’t know what you’re doing, and a lot of the genetics involved can be hard to discern based on the relatives you know closely, so it operates as luck in practice). I know people who are definitely more motivated and committed parents than me who have kids that I would resent if I was their parent. A kid who is mentally or physically defective, especially mentally when it also interferes with their ability to bond, is more likely to provoke this feeling in me, and per the commentary above about prehistoric rates of infanticide, etc. I do believe that my ancestors dealt with this issue by rejecting any kids they had who sucked in a similar way. 21st century western capitalism exerts stronger selection pressure on parents of mentally and physically incapable people, and if you have a kid who is likely to cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions of dollars in additional expenses and untold amounts of stress and heartache before they reach 18 it’s a rational response. This is why anyone who says they support banning abortion before 20 weeks is retarded. It’s not until the 20 week appointment that you find out “oh shit our baby will be missing a left ventricle and if it survives birth it will be 99% certain to die by age 12 and will require millions of dollars of surgery to even get that far” and should have the ability to say “uh yeah no thanks, tough break, defective baby.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5511203&forum_id=2...id#47542459)