Date: April 10th, 2024 4:25 PM
Author: Citrine Address Indirect Expression
great comeback.
let's see if you can explain how forcing children to lick the ass of their governor is different from a governor's order to prohibit 'inherently divisive things'.
wow. that seems so subjective. think of the problems. well, first let's see what that means
"For the purposes of this Executive order “inherently divisive concepts” means advancing
any ideas in violation of Title IV and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including, but not
limited to of the following concepts (i) one race, skin color, ethnicity, sex, or faith is inherently
superior to another race, skin color, ethnicity, sex, or faith; (ii) an individual, by virtue of his or
her race, skin color, ethnicity, sex or faith, is racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or
subconsciously, (iii) an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment
solely or partly because of his or her race, skin color, ethnicity, sex or faith, (iv) members of one
race, ethnicity, sex or faith cannot and should not attempt to treat others as individuals without
respect to race, sex or faith, (v) an individual's moral character is inherently determined by his or
her race, skin color, ethnicity, sex, or faith, (vi) an individual, by virtue of his or her race, skin
color, ethnicity, sex, or faith, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other
members of the same race, ethnicity, sex or faith, (vii) meritocracy or traits, such as a hard work
ethic, are racist or sexist or were created by a particular race to oppress another race. "
so, you believe teaching kids things contrary to this list should be permissible?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5515800&forum_id=2#47571350)