The true facepalm-moment is that the original idea, supporting the labor-market with more workers, doesn't function. Newly arrived immigrants can't compete adequately on the high-tech job market of the 21th century. So we still have high inflation but now also more unemployed to take care of. So we are back at square one economically, but plus new social issues on top of it, that by themselves cost money. Immigrants grow older aswell, and need health-care, pensions and dental-care in the same way - and Sweden is not going to let anyone starve (nor should we). So the only solution is opening the wallet time and time again. Now everything else suffers and this hits Sweden extra hard, because Sweden has the highest-taxes in the world (or among the highest). The average Swede is fine with it, but expects quality in return. This is the mutual agreement that our entire country is built on, and what's going to happen when we can't uphold it? Middle-class white kids also deserves a quality education, you can't burn through every reserve trying to fix the immigration. But you can't leave it like it is either.

All in all, I believe Sweden will be at the forefront of a worldwide debate on multiculturalism and the causes of crime since we are the first western country ever, to implement multiculturalism without a colonial past. What do I mean by that?

Essentially, we are turning into the US but despite being the complete opposite of the US on almost every metric possible: Welfare, inequality, law-enforcement, education, history and more. Sweden had no part in slavery, has had no race-laws, we have the most generous welfare-system in the world, the calmest Police-force, humane prisons, free universities and so on. Now we are slowly getting the same no-go zones, the gated communities, the tougher Police (with the same racism-debate) and so on.

How can so vastly different starting points yield the same outcome? It's almost an argument against my own field (political science). What are we studying if we can't satisfyingly explain it? In a country such as the US or France, one could quickly point to the racist history, but that won't work in the same way in Sweden.

In my opinion, the only way forward is seeking out brand new explanations, and discuss completely new areas. At the very least, this debate will be interesting to follow.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577156)

Are they really all that new?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577753)

"migrants" refers to Africans in Europe and Central Americans etc in the US

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577176)

libs love all migration and a beaner or nigga or muzzie is equal to an H1B1 turd

see how retarded this is? cons and libs actually agree on something! if cons actually wanted to really fight migration they wld go after the problem migrant groups first instead of pretending they ever will stop all migration (which obviously hasnt happened anywhere in the west)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577187)

wanting to ban fraud H1B1s isn't the same as illegals or Africans

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577189)

there is just one group of people who recognizes and is okay with recognizing the actual cause of our problems, and wants to do something about it. and there is another group of people who also know what the problem is, but they want the problems caused by the people causing the problems to keep happening, and actually get worse

eventually there will be enough people in the first group of people who are willing to treat the second group of people as just as much of their enemies as those causing the problems, and that is when things will come to a head

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577168)

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577211)

I think this guy knows exactly what's up but is carefully phrasing the issue to avoid getting banned.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577227)

OH WHAT A MYSTERY!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577239)

What a fucking idiot. It doesn't even occur to him that because we observe the same level of dysfunction among blacks in Sweden without any racist history, the racist history of the US may not be the cause of dysfunction among modern American blacks.

To be fair to him, though, this is also a definite possibility: http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577227

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47577451)

Does he not realize that the US doesn't even have no go zones (other than Chaz that couple of weeks)?

Like bro, its not that you've caught up to America in terms of race issues, you fucking passed us in a couple of decades despite being as kind as can be.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5516698&forum_id=2#47578613)