The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
DEI was never about profitability (Karlstack)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 30th, 2024 9:52 AM Author: Boyish rusted lodge roast beef https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dei-was-never-about-profitability/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620910) |
 |
Date: April 30th, 2024 9:54 AM Author: bisexual grizzly masturbator striped hyena Nigger (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620917) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:41 PM Author: at-the-ready nursing home absolutely devastating (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621389) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 3:12 PM Author: excitant insanely creepy bbw doctorate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621929) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 3:13 PM Author: flatulent elastic band meetinghouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621930) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 5:23 PM Author: apoplectic site (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622426) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 3:14 PM Author: High-end motley hospital athletic conference (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621932) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 3:15 PM Author: pontificating associate pistol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621937) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 5:22 PM Author: apoplectic site (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622423) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 6:21 PM Author: slap-happy boistinker (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622640) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 4:05 PM Author: Rambunctious glittery milk ladyboy for board nigs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622130) |
Date: April 30th, 2024 9:55 AM Author: pale alcoholic institution DEI was never about fighting magic dragons either (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620920) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 10:00 AM Author: underhanded vibrant center affirmative action (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620933) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 9:58 AM Author: dark potus There's a bad typo lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620927) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 10:04 AM Author: Boyish rusted lodge roast beef goddamn in (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620949) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 9:59 AM Author: Drunken Sweet Tailpipe I don’t think people who support DEI think it’s about profitability. You could totally 100% disprove that it’s about profitability and people would still support it, so that doesn’t really change the analysis (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620931) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 10:04 AM Author: drab newt keepsake machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620948) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 10:02 AM Author: erotic territorial kitty organic girlfriend "reveal their real" is a bad string of words (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47620939) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 10:04 AM Author: drab newt keepsake machete In short, Brunet wants to be liked, to seem trendy, to seem modern, to seem young. Brunet's overt displays of anti-wokeness serve not as evidence of visionary leadership but as a spectacle of an autistic man hungry for approval.
|
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:04 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university (jealous dork who has never been retweeted by xo ackman) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621248) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:01 PM Author: Lime Splenetic Yarmulke Saying “DEI is about profitability” is like claiming the Civil War was about slavery.
Both sides know it’s not true, but by making the claim, you are forcing the other side to do the impossible: prove a negative. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:13 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret The Civil War was about slavery though. It’s only retarded historiography from Southerners that enjoyed a brief iconoclastic moment in asserting otherwise. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621265) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:22 PM Author: Lime Splenetic Yarmulke Sure sure. And Iraq was about WMDs, right? And there was no slavery in the US following the Civil War? And no slave states on the side of the union? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621296) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:26 PM Author: Carnelian Puppy No one was more pissed off about the end of slavery than the Chickasaw and the Choctaw of Eastern Oklahoma. Imagine being an Indian and getting stepped on all the time by whitey. But then you discover there's someone even lower than you on the totem pole. Enter the negro. A man so low that even the Indian could get free labor out of him. They were the last to give it up when the Union showed up in 1866-67. Man they were pissed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621314) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:43 PM Author: Lime Splenetic Yarmulke I vaguely remember reading about how there was an entire class of half white, half Indian slave owners which constituted some of the largest slave owning groups in the world. The half white aspect gave them the ability to buy slaves, while the half Indian heritage meant they had access to Indian lands which white settlers weren’t allowed on. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621396) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:36 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret (tbf alt) Can you elaborate as to what you believe was the main cause of the CW? |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:39 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university it was about state's rights. specifically, a state's right to have legal slavery. although no one gave a fuck above the slaves, as evidenced by how we treated blacks after and how global slavery persisted for some time after (and exists today in all but name). it was about maf cumskins not being able to compete with slave labor and an entrenched southern aristocracy.
but don't think about that. keep voting for open borders because it's "oh so humanitarian" to import a slave-like underclass to pick your strawberries. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:52 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret Partial credit. Northern states weren’t concerned with wage preservation in new states. They wanted to (A) avoid adding more states with pro-slavery reps and senators, and (B) advance abolition. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621441) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:57 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university if i pull speeches by abolitionists explicitly making the issue about economics is this going to be like Cass study thread where you mocked me for "not understanding the study" and disappeared when i quoted the key findings that said exactly what i said the study contained? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621458) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:03 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret I got bored of that thread, but I’m on a long flight so I’ll go back to prove you wrong.
Yes, quotes from those speeches (with links to the full text so that we can see whether wage-preservation was the principal argument) will be useful.
Would it be useful for me to quote SC’s declaration of secession where they proclaimed that they were seceding to preserve the institution of slavery, or are you already familiar with that document? |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:10 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university we're in agreement that the civil war was about a state's right to have legal slavery. we're in disagreement about the motives of the union pushing abolition.
sure, if you can prove me wrong in that thread i'll pull some speeches about absolutists regarding it being about economics.
note: of course there were some radical abolitionists who did have humanitarian motivations. but the fact they were labeled "radical" may clue a careful reader in on whether their views were in the majority. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:13 PM Author: Carnelian Puppy Thaddeus Stevens was the EPAH of his time. He was a niggerlover and the Radical Republicans pushed the Reconstruction Amendments because the North had just won a big war and the other Republicans were like yeah okay whatever. It was all because Thaddeus really wanted to fuck his nigger wife. Everyone knew about it and they all knew why he loved niggers so much. The South had zero political power during this time and their "state governments" were kangaroo legislators organized by the North to get what they wanted done. As soon as the Southern states agreed to have northern cock in their mouth they were "readmitted" into the Union providing they adopted all the laws the North wanted. What's amazing about this fuckery is that as gay and retarded as it was it didn't involve any Jews which is the hardest part to believe of all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621513) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:22 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university actually "carpetbaggers and scallywags" is another southern "lost cause" myth and actually the south wasn't mad about getting looted following the war but were just YSSFM about antiracism.
just like how today everyone who claims that importing migrants to work for poverty wages isn't about humanitarianism is also just a racist pretending to care about the migrants and fellow citizens.
in this house no person is illegal, conturd. least of all my gardener, who i pay a princely sum of $3/hr to tend my plantation. i mean, azaleas. not stop distracting bort humanitarian epah who is flying from hawaii (island where whites liberated the natives who just so happen to live in poverty serving whites) to california (mexican territory liberated by whites where natives just so happen to live in poverty serving whites). |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:29 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret Responded in that other thread. I guarantee you’ll be able to appreciate my points there.
Also I’m flying from Boston to Hawaii so you were obviously wrong ^^ |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:31 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university the same humanitarian abolitionist boston that rioted when it was forcibly desegregated a century after the civil war? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621589) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:05 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret As I explained, that’s not a good argument because being opposed to slavery and wanting blacks in your kids’ schools are very different things: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&mc=59&forum_id=2#47621467 I forget if you’re part of the anti-Semite crew, but even among that crew there are people who wouldn’t deny the Holocaust, but nevertheless oppose what they perceive as undo Jewish/Israel influence. Both positions might be anti-Jew, but they aren’t the same, right? |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:11 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university you're purposefully minimizing the disparate treatment of whites and blacks for a century after the civil war (again, in a way you would *NEVER* do IRL) rather than addressing it head on because it's difficult (re: impossible) to reconcile with the belief that abolition was primarily driven by humanitarianism.
i'm not an antisemite i just like to be edgy on xo sometimes. although i do think jews have an outsized influence on the economy and politics. but i don't think it's because of some conspiracy nor do i prejudge jews (or any group) based on observable trends of their group. i'm a realist (although you'd probably lump that in with racist), but i don't think observable trends in groups justifies disparate treatment of groups. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:57 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret (Racist) Did you find those speeches you referenced ^^? I’m not sure what you mean by “confront it head on.” Maybe I didn’t explain myself well enough. My point was that a primary purpose in opposing the expansion of slave states (after the congressional headcount) was moral opposition to *slavery. That of course doesn’t require 100% (or even a majority) of citizens in Northern states to also desire integrated schools. In fact I’ll bet we could find lots of abolitionists who opposed integrated schooling (although I imagine it was so unthinkable at the time that it wasn’t even an issue for discussion). Is your point something like “your abolitionist rhetoric isn’t sincere unless you also support integrated schools”? |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 3:14 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university said i'd pull the speeches when you proved me wrong, and so far i didn't see a retort to
"report contains x", "report doesn't contain x", here's a quote from the report saying x." responding that "i don't believe the conclusions of the report are justified" is different than "that's not what the report says." although i'll pull the speeches later if you just admit you were wrong and glib :)
i meant "confront it head on." you're a smart guy, did you really not understand that from the context, or are you pointing out an obvious typo as a devastating pwn?
i thought i clearly stated my point from the beginning. but i'll clarify:
"the push for abolition was primarily for economic, and not humanitarian reasons. this is demonstrated by the fact that former slaves frequently lived in worse materially conditions after slavery and we continued to utilize slave labor abroad."
if the union was opposed to slavery for moral reasons why would they continue to utilize slave labor and allow blacks to live under worse material conditions after emancipation? the unavoidable conclusion is that they didn't care about blacks being mistreated, but were concerned about their own conditions, and how they would worse off if they had to compete with slaves. hence *why* the debate principally centered around expansion into new territories rather than abolishing it at home. and yeah, having more free state representatives mattered -- because they wanted more free states, i.e. places where citizens could compete on equal footing. the didn't give a fuck about what happened to blacks after they were freed. nor did the give a fuck about people enslaved abroad. they were in it for their own benefit, not out of humanitarianism or altruism. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 5:09 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret Did you read the post I made in the Cass thread? I don’t quibble with the “conclusions” you quoted. But you don’t seem to know what those “conclusions” were other than “the blockers were not efficacious.” The relevant inquiry is “efficacious of WHAT.” I don’t necessarily disagree with the mental health conclusions (although the absence of a control group makes this impossible to detect). But if the question is “were the blockers efficacious in fulfilling the purpose desired by the recipients,” then even Cass agrees they are 100% efficacious. My problem is that in reciting her conclusions, she NOWHERE states what she was measuring. This leads people who didn’t scrutinize the report to think that her findings are broader than suicidality and depression rates, which is in fact the ONLY thing she considers.
Now, the quotes or sources you have in mind that support your belief that abolitionists in fact were more concerned with protecting white laborers than morality? |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 6:12 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university i'm heading out. i'll respond to your cass shit in the cass thread tomorrow.
please don't misunderstand -- the laborers are always exploited and get fucked. the fight was between the modern capital system of the north (entrepreneurs and industrialists) versus the aristocratic system of the south (large plantation owners). although the north definitely had more populist fervor because free labor enables more class mobility than an entrenched aristocracy.
i definitely think the union was more on the side of populist white labor than the south. i mean, otherwise why wouldn't the south just emancipate to begin with? but i don't think union, which was powered by cheap laborer in deplorable conditions, cared *that* much about the working class either. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 7:14 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret (Nikki Haley) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622803) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:40 PM Author: Lime Splenetic Yarmulke A bunch of people saying they wanted to split off and form their own country and a bunch of other guys saying they had to stay. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621388) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:50 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret We could reduce it further by saying “it was because they fired on Fort Sumter,” but we need to think more expansively. As in WHY they wanted “their own country.” It wasn’t because they wanted to decide their own curriculums or charge higher or lower tariffs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621431) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 4:18 PM Author: Lime Splenetic Yarmulke > We could reduce it further by saying “it was because they fired on Fort Sumter,” No, actually, we couldn’t. Your example derived from mine, not the other way around. I guess logic wasn’t your strong suit.
Thinking there is some monolithic “reason” behind the civil war is midwit thinking at its finest. Historians like to pull the “politicians said ‘X’ and newspapers said ‘Y’” logic to support their claims. However, in the case of the civil war, slavery is easily ruled out. Not only is it ridiculous to think that hundreds of thousands of men just happened to perfectly align between states to fight each other over something that had little to no impact on them, we also know the Civil War didn’t end slavery in the US, slave states fought in the union, and slavery was a dying enterprise anyways.
I always like to bring up the Iraq War because we all lived through it. By your (implied) standards: the war in Iraq was 100% about weapons of mass destruction, everyone who fought in that war was fighting over WMDs, and implying there could be any other reasons for the war or for Americans enlisting is blasphemy and retard level logic. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 5:13 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret I don’t believe I said 100%, but it was certainly the primary cause. If your contrary argument is “historians are full of shit and don’t know the REAL cause of the Civil War like I do,” then it gets really hard to argue with you, and I might as well argue with tbf. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 6:03 PM Author: Lime Splenetic Yarmulke > I don’t believe I said 100%, but it was certainly the primary cause.
Don’t hold out on us: give us a percent! |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:36 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university cr. that's why blacks were treated so 180 before and after the civil war in the north. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621367) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:00 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret People who think critically and carefully like xo posters can readily see that there is daylight between (A) opposition to slavery, and (B) treating black people as whites’ equals in social spheres. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621467) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:07 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university people who think critically and carefully might also recognize the disconnect in slavery being principally about humanitarianism when (1) we continued utilize slave labor abroad and (2) the way blacks were treated across the us after the civil war was so cruel and endorsed by white society that you would never even say what you just said out loud irl.
lmfao blacks were just treated "somewhat differently in social spheres" during the race riots and lynchings that occurred across union states for a century after the civil war. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:08 PM Author: Cruel-hearted Regret Is it your sense that the people who perpetrated the Tulsa Race Riots were abolitionists? I think you’re failing to recognize that the populace of a given state isn’t monolithic.
I’m not sure what you mean by #1 or how it relates to this erudite discussion. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:21 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university if opposition to slavery was based on humanitarian concerns we would not have continued (and, in fact, continue) to utilize slave labor outside our borders. the only reason we eventually abolished it within our borders is because other americans got maf that they couldn't compete with slave labor.
this is also demonstrated by how former slaves frequently lived under far worst material conditions post slavery. which you downplay as "haha well people aren't monolithic and they just wanted separate but equal." despite the fact that studies across the globe post-slavery universally concluded far worse materially conditions.
of course, this is the point in the debate where you clutch your pearls over me "conflating chattel slavery with living conditions." because that handy trick allows you to retain the moral high ground while continuing to oppress (in some wars worse) an underclass of people. but before you do, let me be clear that, of course, chattel slavery is uniquely evil and abhorrent. |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:47 PM Author: Iridescent trip church hairy legs Plenty of shitlibs today still find niggers to be inferior though they won't admit it out loud. It's why they've supported AA this long (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621865) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:50 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university yeah, and they tend to dress up this discrimination with a veneer of compassion and then retcon history. not like epah, who believes millions of union soldiers fought and died because blacks were being treated inhumanely (although they went on to treat them inhumanely for at least another century) and that discrimination is a good thing (because some races are just subhuman and can't compete without a boost). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621873) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:02 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university wow, the code has been cracked. turns out that selecting people based on things other than merit isn't about creating the best workforce. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621246) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:11 PM Author: underhanded vibrant center affirmative action now i don't know what to believe. next he might tell us congressional votes aren't actually about good governance, or wars aren't actually about the casus belli. fuck, maybe rape isn't even about power after all... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621260) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:15 PM Author: Boyish rusted lodge roast beef (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621274) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:16 PM Author: Carnelian Puppy Study: doctors now believe obesity is linked to overeating. Rain is wet. People like money. What multitude of concessions about reality will libs acknowledge next? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621278) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:16 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university the next groundbreaking article may be about how environmental initiatives are actually about enriching the ruling class (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621280) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:19 PM Author: Carnelian Puppy Will it mention Al Gore's vast holdings in green energy companies? Or that most renewables are owned by big oil companies who simply charge the government more to build windmills or whatever? My God. The spicy revelations keep coming down from on high. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621290) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:21 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university holy shit guys, you're never gonna believe it, but it turns out that environmental initiates amount to nothing more than tax breaks and outright handouts to politically connected rich people! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621295) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:22 PM Author: Carnelian Puppy you're not going to believe this but everyone who buys a Tesla actually gets a tax break and/or some form of government rebate. It's almost as if the government is inflating Tesla sales and it's not all just the guiding hand of capitalism. It's like some kind of private public partnership. Wait til you see who actually owns shares in this corporation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621300) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:25 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university stop being so cynical. the experts all agree that we can materially reduce global co2 emissions by tweaking the us tax code. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621309) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:29 PM Author: Carnelian Puppy It's like when the Germans figured out they could ban fossil fuels in Germany but as long as they imported oil from Russia then it wasn't technically a problem. It almost seems from a 30,000 ft view like they wanted to be dependent on Russian oil for some reason. This may actually sound a bit crazy and conspiratorial but a former German chancellor actually became the head of the largest Russian oil company. Isn't that crazy? I am an npc btw and have no ability to assess things from a critical perspective. Epstein DID in fact kill himself and Jews definitely didn't ban TikTok because they were getting crushed in the court of public opinion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621330) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:32 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university what are you lisping about? shut up and use this fucking paper straw made in china by slaves and coal and shipped across the ocean on a fossil fuel powered container ship. it's the environmentally responsible thing to do, goy. now stfu, i've gotta board my private plane as the sole passenger to make it to the geneva climate conference. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621342) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:58 PM Author: Carnelian Puppy (Greta Thunberg breaking character) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621461) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:18 PM Author: Ultramarine wrinkle mad-dog skullcap MY diversity. MY vote. MY rape. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621285) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:13 PM Author: Drunken Sweet Tailpipe his whole shtick is pandering to a racist audience (exactly xo’s demographic) and yet you guys give him tons of shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621267) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:15 PM Author: bisexual grizzly masturbator striped hyena Yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621272) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:36 PM Author: Sinister Dilemma Dingle Berry you are a mentally retarded jewish pedophile who is obsessed with race and calling people racist like every other hysterical jewish dumb as shit pedo out there. you manage to be even dumber and more annoying than the retarded canadian fagnut OP. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621369) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:16 PM Author: saffron 180 parlor hilariously enough there are probably a lot of retarded gen x and boomer whites reading this "article" and nodding along in agreement
this really is prime normiecon bait |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:19 PM Author: Boyish rusted lodge roast beef it's going megaviral on twitter
it's good content sir
https://x.com/realChrisBrunet/status/1785321789544931571 |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:23 PM Author: saffron 180 parlor this stuff is legitimately groundbreaking for normiecons
the truth is that these made-up rationalizations for why the shitlib religion is Good and Must Be account for a lot more of their power over people than most "redpilled" people like to admit |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:28 PM Author: Boyish rusted lodge roast beef (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621320) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:32 PM Author: underhanded vibrant center affirmative action my facebook-megapoaster uncle doesn't know about regulatory capture either. who cares. you can teach the normiecons of the world a thing or two, but good luck getting them to see a bigger picture or giving them the intellectual tools to wade through the world themselves without the training wheels of karlstack-level takes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621340) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:34 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university (cynical faggot who doesn't realize one anti-lgbt minions meme may change the course of history) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621351) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:34 PM Author: Boyish rusted lodge roast beef (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621352) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:50 PM Author: narrow-minded locus half-breed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621872) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:32 PM Author: drab newt keepsake machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621343) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:06 PM Author: apoplectic site viral on twitter does not good content make (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621486) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:38 PM Author: Canary yapping piazza headpube (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621619) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:17 PM Author: Heady black gas station philosopher-king lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621281) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 12:26 PM Author: Lime Splenetic Yarmulke There was an old article, which I’m struggling to find, that called up the authors of one of the studies cited in the original McKinsey “study”. The author confirmed that his study had come to the opposite conclusion of McKinsey and that it didn’t support their conclusions at all (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621313) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:14 PM Author: frozen alcoholic mad cow disease orchestra pit Absolutely Earth shattering revelations here karl (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621517) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 2:13 PM Author: Boyish rusted lodge roast beef (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621730) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 5:11 PM Author: passionate den (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622375) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 1:49 PM Author: Autistic sexy personal credit line forum Wow, what a stunning insight that hiring minorities and women doesn't help a company's bottom line. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47621663) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 5:11 PM Author: buck-toothed office kkkarl has an 80 post thread here. seems like low-IQ posts to bait mockery is a winning strategy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622374) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 5:11 PM Author: Mind-boggling Poppy Space Liquid Oxygen (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622378) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 5:11 PM Author: passionate den Was it ever supposed to be? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622377) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 6:27 PM Author: lascivious flushed sex offender Pretty clean bingo card from Karl https://files.catbox.moe/cubxij.png |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 6:31 PM Author: razzmatazz quadroon university (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622665) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 6:49 PM Author: Carnelian Puppy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622734) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 6:50 PM Author: apoplectic site (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622738) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 7:18 PM Author: Boyish rusted lodge roast beef (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622829) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 7:32 PM Author: multi-colored dull filthpig >The loudest cheerleader for this now-debunked McKinsey talking point is the billionaire Mark Cuban, of Shark Tank and Dallas Mavericks fame.
Whoa are you telling me that a Jewish billionaire would just *lie* about something that harms white people? |
|
Date: April 30th, 2024 7:34 PM Author: honey-headed plaza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5523084&forum_id=2#47622894) |