And they do have a point.

Its crazy that we have all these species that are so different from one another when we should be seeing an unbroken chain of one animal that looks a little bit different from the next, all the way from small little amphibians to huge mammals.

We should be able to line the species up like in one of those picture flipbooks and watch them morph by 'flipping' through the pages really quickly.

But where are the 'missing links'?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628099)

the idea doesn't make sense. any fossil of any living creature is a "transition fossil" in the sense that there were species before that creature, and species after that creature. nobody is gonna find a fossil of a year 2000 human in the year 100,000 A.D. and think that it was a "transition species" between savannah apes and whatever eloi creatures come after humans. even though that is technically what we would be

think about it for like 30 seconds. this is one of the most low-IQ and silly "anti-evolution" arguments

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628112)

the entire attempted distinction between "micro-evolution" and "macro-evolution" is incoherent and silly and a product of dishonest people who want to justify their own religious beliefs. it's unironically just a bunch of fundamentalist christians making up pseudo-intellectual nonsense

if micro-evolution is real (and it is, it's a phenomena that's observable by an individual), then macro-evolution is also real, because it's the same phenomenon and mechanism. there's no anti-evolution argument that holds any water

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628152)

i know people personally who have done fruit fly breeding. it's very easy and an average person can do it and understand it

we know how evolution works. it's real and undeniable

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628194)

yet you can't show me the transition fossils without engaging in a bunch of sophistry "theyre all transition fossils!'

uh, you know what i am talking about faggot. show me the transition fossils between the species that draws a solid link from the single cell organisms down to humans.

you can't do it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628306)

close your eyes, focus, and think about this abstractly for 60 to 120 seconds. focus on nothing else. focus on these questions:

1. what would a "transition fossil" look like compared to a regular fossil?

2. what are the specific differences/characteristics that make a fossil a "transition fossil?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628370)

more sophistry.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628598)

answer the questions

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628606)

Lol the answer is SO obvious, yet it is impossible for you to just provide an answer. Telling.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628626)

you just don't like the answer, so you ignore it, because you're some tedious middle-aged midwit who has a "worldview" that he settled on 15 years ago and you're only interested in the dopamine hits you get from having it validated

you are the gentile version of consuela

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628649)

LOL no. thats not an "answer" to a question. Its just sophistry as has been repeatedly pointed out to you.

Where are the fossils for the missing links?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628676)

every species is a missing link species

these things are true and will always be true no matter how much it frustrates you for whatever stupid low iq reason

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628694)

This seems more obvious to me than your conclusion that all fossils are transition fossils. There is no self evident transition phase between a billion different species

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47630645)

creatures diverging from each other will continue to mate with each other. their offspring are just less and less successful, and selection pressures favor the speciation break more and more, until they have fully diverged

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47630946)

Offspring of mates of different species are completely infertile. There's not a spectrum of fertility that correlates with parental genetic homogeneity

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47633287)

This is a pretty common misunderstanding, and the same "misunderstanding" that lib pseudo-intellectuals are making when they claim that "race mixing is ackshually good!" It's not, of course: race mixing in humans leads to reduced fitness, as can be easily empirically observed, because racial populations are too genetically distant from each other and therefore get dinged by outbreeding depression

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47633391)

every living creature is in a transition phase between a billion different species coming before and after it "

this is a refutation/rejection of the entire idea of speciation. under this theory we should be able to arrange all 100 trillion organisms currently living on the earth of a smooth spectrum of being. ie, every single being would be able to reproduce with the organism to the right of it, and the left of it. easy and seamless transitions at the individual level, but nevertheless on the wider spectrum you have single celled animals all the way to the left and blue whales all the way to the right

idk maybe you believe this, I don't argue points of religious doctrine, but it certainly seems off to me just on an "eyeball" basis so to speak

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47634339)

https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3344/3331851919_a8a1429011_b.jpg

And here’s one that lost its pigment:

https://static.mothership.sg/1/2019/12/gorilla-hand-look-like-human.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47628118)

The earth is 4 billion years old.

The last common human chimp ancestor lived 5-13 million years ago.

Million = 1000 millennia so if each generation was 20 years, there are 50 generations per millennia times 1000 millennia per million years times 5 millions = 250,000 generations since last common ancestor.

Seems enough generations to me for Incremental changes to separate the chimpanzees and humans.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47630028)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo_Ann_Hardesty#/media/File%3AJoAnn_Hardesty.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47634325)

Whites are aliens. asians their science experiment.

this is all fact.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5524013&forum_id=2#47634362)