ITT I summarize the Doe's requests for IPs in the new filing
| Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Screeching Weasel | 01/26/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | cumslut | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Puck42 | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Mr. Erin Andrews | 01/25/08 | | Peenicus | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/26/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | ...;. ... .... ...;... .:.... .... .....; | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | done and done | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | done and done | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | done and done | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | Mr. Erin Andrews | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | KingSlender | 01/25/08 | | smooth sexual love | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | smooth sexual love | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | Mr. Erin Andrews | 01/25/08 | | Carmello Anthony | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | DoeLawsuit 1 | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | DoeLawsuit 1 | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | done and done | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | done and done | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | done and done | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | done and done | 01/26/08 | | Mr. Erin Andrews | 01/25/08 | | Carmello Anthony | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Carmello Anthony | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/26/08 | | cumslut | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | Ashley Riot | 01/25/08 | | ...;. ... .... ...;... .:.... .... .....; | 01/25/08 | | .,.,..;,. | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | .,.,.,.., .,...,,.,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,,.,. | 01/25/08 | | A Heartbreaking loaf of Staggering Chuckis | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | CBOMO | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | old reg lamenting the board's decline | 01/25/08 | | ....... ..... ... . .............. ... | 02/27/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | old reg lamenting the board's decline | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Carmello Anthony | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | Swattie | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | Swattie | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | Swattie | 01/25/08 | | old reg lamenting the board's decline | 01/25/08 | | Mr. Erin Andrews | 01/25/08 | | Hazelrah | 01/25/08 | | cumslut | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | cumslut | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | old reg lamenting the board's decline | 01/25/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/25/08 | | Doohickey | 01/25/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/25/08 | | OfficeMate's OfficeMate | 01/25/08 | | smooth sexual love | 01/25/08 | | OfficeMate's OfficeMate | 01/25/08 | | smooth sexual love | 01/26/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | Swattie | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | cumslut | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | cumslut | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | done and done | 01/25/08 | | cumslut | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/26/08 | | ho there! | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/26/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/26/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/26/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/26/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/26/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/26/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/26/08 | | rowine | 01/26/08 | | rowine | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | ICE = I Cocksuck Exclusively. HTH. | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | I-Ienrietta Egg | 01/26/08 | | rowine | 01/26/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | TPR droid hater | 01/25/08 | | old reg lamenting the board's decline | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | old reg lamenting the board's decline | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | rowine | 01/25/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/26/08 | | rowine | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | rowine | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/26/08 | | rowine | 01/26/08 | | rowine | 01/26/08 | | stalking_horse | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | stalking_horse | 01/25/08 | | cumslut | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | jager bombs, I fuckin shower in that shit | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | old reg lamenting the board's decline | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | .,.,..;,. | 01/25/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/25/08 | | Rational thought | 01/25/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/25/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/25/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/25/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | ICE = I Cocksuck Exclusively. HTH. | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/25/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/25/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | DoeLawsuit 1 | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | CBOMO | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | Hercules Q. Einstein | 01/26/08 | | Rational thought | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | Rational thought | 01/26/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/26/08 | | 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator | 01/26/08 | | ...Guess the CA... | 01/26/08 | | I like the way ya Gwerk it | 01/26/08 | | ICE = I Cocksuck Exclusively. HTH. | 01/26/08 | | smooth sexual love | 01/26/08 | | Aram Fingal | 01/26/08 | | PeterGunz | 02/27/08 |
Poast new message in this thread

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:01 PM Author: Hazelrah (http://xoxoreader.blogspot.com/)
Domains By Proxy: KVN wants names of all persons that registered Autoadmit.com, Xoxohth.com, Cohenrisk.com, and c16.statcounter.com
LOL @ statcounter
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221389) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:35 PM Author: Screeching Weasel
Haha. I thought the same thing. Why the hell do they think domains by proxy even has that info?
Here I'll make it easy for them:
Registrant:
StatCounter
16 Chapelizod Moorings
Chapelizod, Dublin 20
IE
dns-admin@statcounter.com
+353.14361868
+353.16215744
Domain Name: STATCOUNTER.COM
Administrative & Technical Contact:
Aodhan Cullen
16 Chapelizod Moorings
Chapelizod, Dublin 20
IE
dns-admin@statcounter.com
+353.14361868
Domain Name Servers:
NS5.EV1SERVERS.NET
NS6.EV1SERVERS.NET
Transfer-Lock Status: ENABLED
Created: January 5, 2000
Modified: October 10, 2006
Expires: January 5, 2009
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9224175)
|

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:02 PM Author: Hazelrah (http://xoxoreader.blogspot.com/)
Go Daddy: All log files, authentication records, and file system backups since 2005 for Autoadmit.com, Xoxohth.com, Cohenrisk.com, c16.statcounter.com
LOL again at statcounter
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221398)
|
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:16 PM Author: Mr. Erin Andrews
"batemanhls@hotmail.com"
Do you really need more information than this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221463) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 12:15 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
The people you work with aren't smart enough to understand that they have to show that they tried to get the ip addresses?
Are your colleagues unfamiliar with the concept of due diligence?
Your office is full of stupid shits who don't know anything about the law. Maybe someday if you ever go to law school you'll see what it's like working in a law office.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222626) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:50 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
No, it allows them to get the judge to grant their motion for expedited discovery. Then they get to ask GTO and Rach for THEIR "nonexistent" (ahem) records.
Dig?
If you stick around long enough maybe something will rub off on you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222957) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:31 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
What a shame that the yale professors and supreme court litigators on the Ps team don't have your legal acumen.
We're all waiting excitedly to see what sort of slick moves the Ds crack legal team will make.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223019) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:45 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
I guess you didn't read any of the filings, nor did you read what I just posted.
Some of the places they contacted DO have information that they will hand over to the Ps.
GTO and Rach DO have information that they are going to hand over to the Ps.
GTO announced right here that he has info, that the info will out one or more Ds, and that the Ds should get counsel. he said that he would not fight a subpoena and that he would comply with it.
Both he and Rach have been talking to the Ps.
The Ps approached AHWIAB and asked for cooperation. He blew them off and now he's named. What he did is minor - they probably would have let him totally off the hook in exchange for some info. But sadly, he just blew them off and has now been outed.
yeah, doing nothing is definitely the smart thing to do.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223035) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:01 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
No. He blew them off after he knew they knew who he was.
AHWIAB did not know what they wanted from him.
It was obvious to AHWIAB that they knew who he was and that they could serve him if they wanted to.
AHWIAB had nothing to lose by accepting their offer to talk. From what I can see, the things he said were minor compared to the others. It would not surprise me in the least if they were prepared to let him off the hook in exchange for ratting out the other Ds (or at least giving as much info as he could.)
Do whatever you want. The end result will be the same. by prolonging it you actually make yourself suffer more - makes no difference to me.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223069) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:10 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
You will definitely find out soon enough LOL.
I hope you're using tor right now. Just because you're on the gwerks account doesn't mean that your message can't be linked to an IP you know.
I mean, each message has a unique ID.... Do you not get that?
You do know that rach and GTO are on notice to produce all logs, right? And you know they are going to comply, right?
All they have to do is see what IP posted your messages. Done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223096) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:27 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Let me break it down for you like this.
It's easy to tell you're a D. You're using a CA. You're not only defending the Ds, which is fine, but you're obsessing over it and posting on the subject for hours.
You are also making the same sort of delusional, can't-accept-the-grim-and-ugly-truth "arguments" that other Ds make. These arguments are just absurd. Dismissed on summary judgment? That's just completely insane. Impossible. No one in their right mind would think this case would get dismissed on summary judgment - unless they were simply unable to accept the ugly truth of the consequences of a motion for SJ failing.
NOW - we know you're a D. And soon they are going to have ALLLL the ip logs - including today.
They just look up your IP address, and they can use that to give them a starting point to look for other posts you've made.
You're fucked.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223145) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:30 AM Author: I like the way ya Gwerk it (gwerks gwerks)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223155)
|
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:47 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
"If the Ds legal team manages to figure out who they're litigating against in under 10 months, they'll be way ahead of the plaintiffs."
Uhhhhh...what? Please rewrite this so that it isn't incoherent.
Maybe you don't understand - many of the contacts DO have information and ARE ready to hand it over.
GTO has told the board that he has info that will out one or more Ds and that he is ready to hand it over.
What are you getting at here exactly?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223039) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:54 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
They already have outed one of the Ds. Maybe you don't pay attention very well.
Survive summary judgment? Are you serious?
GTO said he was going to out one or more Ds.
You can continue to delude yourself if you like, or you can prepare for the shitstorm that lies ahead.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223054) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:12 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Ummmm ya ok.
Sleep well ok? Oh and by the way rach and gto are on notice to produce all their IP logs, including today and every day.
Nighty night.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223100) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:15 AM Author: done and done
It's hilarious how you, NYBarExamGod, show up at all the right times to quibble with unimportant aspects of posts here, defend the Ps, and call just about every poster a defendant - almost reminiscent of paranoia.
Then signing off every post with a "Better watch out - Rach's gonna get you!" If I didn't know any better, I'd almost think you had a personal interest in the lawsuit...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223107) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:22 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
You assume that anyone who sides with the Ps must be one person, that there can't be *gasp* more than one?
I already said what my personal interest is. Schadenfreude.
I defend the Ps because the stuff the Ds said was way, way over the line. I'm not very happy about a lot of what's going on on the Ps side, but it is impossible to not empathize with them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223132) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:24 AM Author: done and done
"You assume that anyone who sides with the Ps must be one person, that there can't be *gasp* more than one?"
I'll paypal you $1000 if you are not the same poster as NYBarExamGod. Same posting style, same terrible analysis of the law, same lack of knowledge of the technical issues, etc.
"I already said what my personal interest is. Schadenfreude."
Of course, because you're a dick.
"I defend the Ps because the stuff the Ds said was way, way over the line. I'm not very happy about a lot of what's going on on the Ps side, but it is impossible to not empathize with them."
I can agree with this. Not ALL the stuff the Ds said was 'way, way over the line', but obviously much of what went on during those threads was very objectionable.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223139) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:44 PM Author: smooth sexual love
not at all.
you have no reasonable expectation or privacy when you go to a court to ask for information voluntarily.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221587)
|

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:15 PM Author: Hazelrah (http://xoxoreader.blogspot.com/)
University of Virginia: Logs and identifying info for IP 128.143.65.74 between 1pm and 6pm on March 7, 2007.
Reply from Virginia: Will preserve the records.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221456) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:21 PM Author: Carmello Anthony
i recall there was a dood from uva who offered pics to the t14 admins
he seemed like he was into good-natured fun and not defamation though so i doubt he would be one of the Ds
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221484) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:40 PM Author: done and done
you're right, it doesn't really say that they HAVE a name, or even that the records were still extant.
Either way, it's interesting.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221575) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:48 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
You're reading way, way too much into it.
You're assuming that the person who wrote this email actually knew specifically what info they had. That's not what she says. She said that she was told that they were preserving everything they were able to associate with the IPs.
You Ds are so desperate you try to find a glimmer of hope in the most hopeless of places.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222954) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:57 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
So why do you think that is? From the way you phrased this it appears that you think I'm trying to goad the Ds to turning themselves in.
That's not at all true. The Ds are going to get busted, I don't care how it happens.
My motive is far more simple. Schadenfreude.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223063) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:14 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
You really think they sent the hacker after xoxo? LOL
What social engineering attacks are you talking about? LOL idiot.
How's that ulcer? Must suck, all this stress. Keeps you up at night evidently.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223104) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:18 AM Author: done and done
no fucking joke, the entire board knows who I am. What's your point? Going to continue to cower behind your anonymity, taking cheap shots at me as if I had something to do with the lawsuit?
NEWSFLASH: Many of us posters on here are sympathetic to the Does (even if we think some of their claims are on shaky legal ground), hate pauliewalnuts as much as the Does (or even more so), and generally have no quibble with persuing some of the defendants. Like I said, take your sanctimonious bullshit elsewhere.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223121) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:35 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
LOL Claims on shaky ground? Care to present your arguments against?
Everyone hates PW. Everyone with a brain knows that he'll sell out everyone if he gets the chance. In fact the only reason he probably hasn't sold everyone out already is the fact that he's afraid they'll track his email down.
This is the guy who outed a Sullivan and Cromwell associate for merely emailing him that he liked the T14 site. That guy is pathological.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223165) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:41 AM Author: done and done
"LOL Claims on shaky ground? Care to present your arguments against?"
we've been through this ad nauseum. Regardless, the Ps will get what they really want, which are outted defendants (although I highly doubt they'll get more than a small handful... we'll see in the coming weeks/months)
"Everyone hates PW. Everyone with a brain knows that he'll sell out everyone if he gets the chance. In fact the only reason he probably hasn't sold everyone out already is the fact that he's afraid they'll track his email down. "
I would be very, very, VERY surprised if all the Ds know each other. In fact, I would be surprised if PW could actually give anyone away. I'm sure you have a brilliant theory as to why this is wrong.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223174) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:48 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
No really, I'd like to see your arguments for why the Ps claims are on shaky ground. Did you just read the complaint? Seemed quite compelling to me. Summary judgment? As a matter of fact I DO think the case could be won on summary judgment - by the Ps! I just don't see how the Ds could come up with any defense to the defamation per se claims. Please, I'd love to hear your jurisprudential analysis.
You must know about PWs penchant for outing people yet you claim that he can't out any of the Ds. Now I know you're lying. He is a notorious outing villain. THere are thousands of posts about his outing exploits and the great efforts that were undertaken to clean them up.
I KNOW you know about these things. The fact that you're denying it here proves to me that you are a liar.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223191) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:20 PM Author: done and done
"You must know about PWs penchant for outing people yet you claim that he can't out any of the Ds."
I never said he couldn't out any of the Ds. Why do you insist on hyperbole and strawmen against people who actually agree with you? Stop being an insufferable cunt
"He is a notorious outing villain. THere are thousands of posts about his outing exploits and the great efforts that were undertaken to clean them up."
At least THREE OF THE PEOPLE HE CLAIMED TO OUT WERE NOT WHO HE SAID THEY WERE.
I would appreciate it if you stopped calling those who have honest disagreements with you a liar. People can have differences without lying, and the fact that you impute bad motives to every fucking poster here shows what a delusional moron you are.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9224134) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 7:13 PM Author: .,.,..;,.
There's no doubt in my mind that this guy is an XO poster:
"i even read and enjoyed your screed on beatrice.com. no one reads fiction nowadays because we get all the fiction we can handle from the teletube and the interweb."
Also rails against AA, cites O'Connor in gruter, and talks shit to a bunch of black profs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221674)
|
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 7:21 PM Author: .,.,.,.., .,...,,.,,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,,.,.
Actually there's an old XO poster named Chauncey, correct? This guy might get PWNED.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221698) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:25 PM Author: Carmello Anthony
lol
where've you been dooder?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221511) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:48 PM Author: cumslut
this lawsuit is 179 pages of shit.
These companies only keep logs for 60-90-120 days. Most of the logs they are seeking preservation of did not exist anymore at the time they were seeking the preservation. They will never be able to out more than a handful of D's. These lawyers are clearly not aware of how this stuff works.
Microsofts response is the best, they say they will preserve everything they have but they probably dont have anything because they delete everything every 90 days. The material they want preserved dates to March, but the request dates to December...its all long gone!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221603) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 11:26 PM Author: 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator
I'm not sure if the judge can just automatically grant it because there's no opposition. There's got to be law on how judges handle this, but I imagine the judge has an obligation to consider the reasonableness of it.
I don't know the judge and what the legal authority would be for the defendants' position, but the plaintiffs put together a convincing argument for why they're entitled to proceed in this fashion. I don't think the discovery is overbroad and burdensome, either. They're not asking for the moon and the stars; they want very specific things.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222482) |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:29 PM Author: OfficeMate's OfficeMate
quality thread
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221533)
|
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 8:06 PM Author: OfficeMate's OfficeMate
lolzlolzlolzlolz
not too bad yourself
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221842) |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:36 PM Author: done and done
I love the autoadmit screenshots
"No one got sued in the old days" followed by "lol"
then
"first" followed by "DAMN YOU!" and then "PWN3D!"
EDIT: SWeet, even one of my posts ends up on there
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221558) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 6:40 PM Author: Swattie
*waves to KVN associate*
Do your support WGWAG, KVN associate?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9221574) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:27 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Even more reason to ruin them if you ask me. I don't want far out psychos dragging my profession down.
At least that's one good thing that will come out of this suit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222907) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 12:00 PM Author: I-Ienrietta Egg
Come now. The people here aren't really stable to begin with. Do you really think the last 7+ months of pressure bearing down on the defendants hasn't gotten to them? Affected their work or grades?
Imagine all those weeks and months of going into work and spending late nights in the office or law library, knowing that at any time all the work and planning that got the defendant where he or she was would be snuffed out in two subpoenas. Imagine spending every day wondering when and if your career would end, or what GTO had in his files, or what other people you've never even met might be doing to sell you down the river. Eventually, in fear of being found out, it might affect your social and family life, making you withdraw a bit, making you really wonder why it's worth living when it'll likely all be destroyed.
One day, this thought crosses your mind when you're at the grocery store, and you buy three bottles of tylenol. "Migraines," you tell yourself as you walk home. But as soon as you get into your soiled, dingy 1-br apartment, you open them all up and ingest every pill you can, downing it all with cheap bourbon. Then, sprawled out on the bathroom floor, you wait to die wretched and alone. You don't leave a suicide note and don't tell anyone. You're discovered only after several days of not responding to calls, answering e-mails or being seen in public.
Nobody knows why it happened until the day the subpoenas come. Suddenly Keker & Van Nest is litigating against the estate of the Ayatollah or Rock-n-Rollah. Then, in an awesome flash, it all becomes clear.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223845) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 12:08 PM Author: Hercules Q. Einstein (Fuck you, Frank)
1) i'm not a defendant
2) I'm not going to be driven to suicide
I'm allowed to speak hypothetically
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223865) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:46 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Sometimes people can make you do stuff and they don't have to ask nicely. This would be a prime example.
Sure, go ahead and blow them off if you think they were rude. But don't make the mistake of thinking that they were asking you to do them a favor. You're going to end up doing it one way or another.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222950) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:24 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
I saw the emails one of the does sent asking for the posts to be removed. Rach told us he wouldn't remove them because she didn't ask nicely enough. He was wrong - I thought her emails were very courteous.
When they didn't take the threads down - a practice that is nothing new to xoxo - what did you expect them to do? Say "pretty please" again and again?
They took it to the next level. Big surprise. There's nothing wrong with doing that. What WAS wrong was the response. Totally stupid.
A lot of people who were convinced they were invulnerable are about to pay dearly for their naivete.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222899) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:31 AM Author: I like the way ya Gwerk it (gwerks gwerks)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223018)
|
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:52 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Oooo yeah, the Ps really did mess with the wrong crowd. *rolls eyes*
The Ps have taken this about 10000 levels higher than the Ds are capable of going and the great thing is - no one is going to take your side.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223047)
|
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:08 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
I read the emails that were sent before RD stepped in. They were very polite. Rach and GTO did not comply.
Do I think RD helped matters? Of course. He was asked nicely and refused. Then it was time to ask in a not so nice way.
The Ps are getting what they wanted and the Ds are just losing more and more and more and they have dragged xoxo down with them.
Think about how much revenue GTO and rach have flushed on account of this alone. Not to mention a lost job for GTO and god only knows how much hassle and stress.
The only people who regret RDs involvement are rach gto and the Ds. LOL
If you really think they are going to risk anything at all on saving the ds necks you're wrong.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223091) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:44 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Maybe you don't understand this board very well. It is entirely possible that these Neanderthals would have done the exact same thing even without RD.
They wanted posts removed. They asked nicely. They weren't removed. Did you expect them to leave it at that, to just give up without any further effort? That's foolish.
So what do you think they should have done besides contact RD? What tactic do you suggest they should have employed that would have gotten them what they wanted without RD?
None of it matters anyway - xoxo's overreaction and retaliation against the does after they did nothing wrong is NOT the does fault in ANY way. The Ds are entirely at fault. What the Does did is entirely reasonable and probably the only thing they could have done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223178) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 4:00 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
I'd say that the Ds miscalculated far worse than the Ps did here. You mention the things the Ps got that they didn't bargain for.
The GTO bargain on losing his job? Did rach and GTO bargain on losing all of their advertising revenue?
Did all of the Ds bargain on having their careers destroyed?
Even the Ds who are never identified - if there are any - are still going to have to suffer many many more months of not knowing for sure. That alone is serious punishment.
I disagree. I think the Ds definitely miscalculated worse than the Ps. I think the Ps made exactly the right decision.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223230) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 12:01 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Shows what you know.
This is standard OP in the practice of law.
Of course they ask people who clearly won't have anything. The purpose of asking isn't only to get the info, it is to show that no more info can be gotten.
When Rosen posted notice of the xoxo lawsuit on the board last summer, he included a request for the Ds to contact him. He didn't do that because he actually thought that they WOULD. He did it so that he could say that he TRIED.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222579) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 12:35 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
You don't get it.
Ps: Judge the plaintiff moves for expedited discovery.
Judge: Why, can't you get the IDs without it?
Ps: No judge, we contacted everywhere that might have the records.
Judge: Why didn't you contact all of these sources that might have had IP info?
Ps: Those sources are likely to only keep the data for up to three months so we didn't bother.
Judge: You didn't bother? Motion denied.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222718) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:56 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
I just don't get what you're bitching about. They need to show the judge that they did a lot of legwork. To do that you show the judge records that you tried to get info and couldn't.
If you read any of the materials, a lot of the replies said that they would hand over all the info once they were presented with a subpoena. GTO said the same thing.
Now they go to the judge. "See judge? We tried really really hard but we couldn't get the info we wanted. But we DID get a lot of responses saying they would give us what we want if we can provide a subpoena."
Judge: Motion for expedited discovery granted.
See how this works?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222971) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:20 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
No no no. You don't get it.
Remember all those replies that said that they DID have info, and they'll hand it over when they get the subpoena? BINGO. That's what expedited discovery is for.
GTO and Rach were on the subpoena list too and they have records. We know that they have SOME records and we also know that they were given notice to preserve records in March 2007.
If GTO is a smart man he will have kept ALL of the ip logs.
We know for a fact that they lied when they claimed they never kept IP logs, and we all know that they at least have some.
We also know that GTO has given the board a heads up - he said that he has files on the Ds, and that he would not fight it if the Ps subpoenaed him to hand them over. The Ps also want to depose both him and rach.
That means that every D that GTO and Rach can name is going to be outed.
Are we on the same page now? What do you fail to understand about this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223009) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 3:03 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Now THATS wishful thinking if I've ever heard it.
What about GTO's statement that he had info that would out the Ds and that he would not resist a subpoena? Did you forget about that?
LOL
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223074) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 11:24 PM Author: Rational thought
lol nice post
btw are you rly Rational Thought?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222476) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 11:38 PM Author: ...Guess the CA...
I call bullshit. No one who posts as much as you for as long as you could possibly not have any idea who rational thought is. Absolute bullshit.
This is the most damning evidence that you are he that I've seen yet.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222504) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 12:21 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
You have been posting here since AT LEAST October 2005.
There is absolutely no question that you're lying. You could not possibly post as much as you do for that long and not know about him.
Give it up.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222650) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 12:35 AM Author: 2nd Year Biglaw Litigator
Have I really been posting that long? I figure I started in the first few months of 2006, but I'm not really sure.
I post a lot, but on very specific threads. I block out 95% of the crap on here. I didn't even know about these two Yale girls and all the issues until there were stickies and notices at the top of this board about the whole reputation defender thing. Why is it so hard to imagine that someone doesn't give a crap about the personalities behind whatever monikers? I just want to talk sports and law.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222715) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 1:30 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
You are so full of shit. I just looked at a list of thread titles you've posted in in your illustrious career. Fucking bullshit.
You're finished.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222910) |
 |

Date: January 25th, 2008 11:29 PM Author: I like the way ya Gwerk it (login gwerks pw gwerks)
Yes, that would be Doe II's declaration (page 4, fn 2).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222490)
|
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:08 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Yes, I'm sure that they will be totally outclassed by the legal teams the Ds will come up with.
The ps will have supreme court litigators and yale professors...
The Ds will have.....hmmmm
Well, Rach has his dad, who is a small time lawyer in Shittsville PA.
And GTO has some guy no one has ever heard of in Florida (moredoughhi maybe?)
I'd say the Ps are in for a rough time.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9222992) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:25 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
No I don't think you get it.
GTO has told the board that he has files on the Ds - and the Ps will subpoena him as soon as the judge grants the motion for expedited discovery. GTO has already told the board that he has info that will out some of the Ds and he cautioned them to retain counsel.
The subpoena seeks not only records, but also depositions from Rach and GTO. Every D that they can name is outed.
Also notice that many of the sources from which they requested info said that they will give the info over when the Ps present them with the subpoena. This is standard - they don't want to hand it over without a subpoena because they want to preserve the privacy of their customers, but they will not resist if a subpoena is presented.
Anything else you'd like me to clarify for you?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223013) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 4:20 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
You didn't read very carefully. They DO have information. Don't take my word for it.
As for your second question:
The plaintiffs would be the best people to ask that question. They are proceeding with the lawsuit so evidently they find it helpful. I imagine if they decided they were not accomplishing their goals that they would end it. That has not happened.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223292) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:51 AM Author: I like the way ya Gwerk it (gwerks gwerks)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223045)
|
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 4:22 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
I suppose you'll just have to wait six months to find out.
Maybe GTOs info really won't help them out any Ds after all.
Maybe ak47 and ahwiab and pw won't flip after all.
Who knows, anything is possible.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223299) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 11:46 AM Author: Hercules Q. Einstein (Fuck you, Frank)
flip on who? we don't all hang out in a treehouse together when we're not posting on this message board...at the most, it looks like they'll be able to ID maybe 3 people (who may or may not be the primary culprits)
everyone else is a ghost
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223823) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:18 AM Author: Rational thought
"And GTO has some guy no one has ever heard of in Florida (moredoughhi maybe?)"
um, are you literally fucking retarded? this is gross old man, isn't it?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223006) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 2:41 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
Marc Randazza? Never heard of him. He works in a 2 man shop in Altamonte Springs, FL.
He isn't even listed in Martindale.
It names a firm that doesn't even appear to have a website:
Weston Garrou DeWitt & Walters
Should I have heard of him?
LOL
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223031) |
 |

Date: January 26th, 2008 4:28 AM Author: ...Guess the CA...
It's valid if Rach or GTO respond to it.
Maybe they'll decide to spend a bunch of money to fight it? That way when they prevail the Ps will have to go to the trouble of correcting it. That will really gum up the works.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9223325)
|
Date: February 27th, 2008 4:40 PM Author: PeterGunz
*BUMP*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=753317&forum_id=2#9397050)
|
|
|