The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Justified bearspraying or nah? - video
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:01 PM Author: rambunctious locus ape https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1usccyq/back_the_fuck_away/
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:06 PM Author: Gaped international law enforcement agency It would be justifiable mace spray, but its illegal to use bear spray for self defense (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991007) |
 |
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:12 PM Author: rambunctious locus ape Dude is a prick, but he was walking away - kind of shit only girls know they can get away with. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991030) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:17 PM Author: Gaped international law enforcement agency No he was charging at another girl. Almost as a bear would 🤔 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991054) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:15 PM Author: obsidian lodge Been sprayed with both and mace is far worse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991042) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:16 PM Author: sienna ratface faggotry great poa/mon synergy here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991049) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:12 PM Author: chrome rebellious stag film doctorate no way, old man wasn't moving towards them. those girls need discipline. i might have a little more sympathy one way or the other if i could figure out what triggered the confrontation at the beginning but either way a non-aggressive argument doesn't justify bear spray
edit: from the commeents
He tells them they can’t park there then says it’s because “they’re ticketing” people. -- The dude is weird but the young ladies should be obeying relevant parking regs. |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:21 PM Author: Gaped international law enforcement agency Agreed vigilantes should harass women for parking inappropriately (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991066) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:23 PM Author: chrome rebellious stag film doctorate please try reading it again. q was "is this justified bear spraying" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991073) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:24 PM Author: Gaped international law enforcement agency Why don't you read your last sentence big dog (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991075) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:26 PM Author: chrome rebellious stag film doctorate ok boss, sounds like i acknowledged the guy was being a little weird (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991083) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:27 PM Author: Gaped international law enforcement agency Hey chief kamehameha, why not give the last 9 words a quick once over (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991088) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:40 PM Author: chrome rebellious stag film doctorate is this some kind of a bit? it's hard for me to believe that you honestly think this was justified (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991120) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:52 PM Author: Gaped international law enforcement agency He confronted them and then charged a girl. She wasn't sparying him while he was walking away. That they were allegedly parked illegally is irrelevant. Are you an actual lawyer struggling with this simple reality? The weapon was not good but it was self defense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991147) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 3:02 PM Author: chrome rebellious stag film doctorate he wasn't charging anyone, he was walking away (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991174) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 3:08 PM Author: Gaped international law enforcement agency Wrong (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991186) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 3:28 PM Author: chrome rebellious stag film doctorate no u (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991216) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:20 PM Author: sepia fantasy-prone national She attacked him and deserved to be knocked the fuck out (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991060) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:29 PM Author: naked soul-stirring toilet seat organic girlfriend just look at the cliques. young woman harms old loser -> per se justification (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991091) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:33 PM Author: fishy address He took a huge load of bear spray like a champ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991098) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:34 PM Author: Hilarious hissy fit box office Relevant to know whether the guy qualifies as a "bear." Does he have a web site? If he is indeed a "bear," then bear spray was appropriate; otherwise, not. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991104) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 2:43 PM Author: Curious Flickering Space 100% justified. this young woman is a hero and he's lucky to be alive. all teens girls should carry bear mace and spray it at boomers faces indiscriminately in public. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991127) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 3:43 PM Author: slate stain indian lodge I would like to be sprayed by both of those girls (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881502&forum_id=2)#49991261) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 4:10 PM Author: Flesh windowlicker milk Probably unjustified. But a little inconclusive IMO, he definitely was hostile towards them and could have been advancing toward someone in their group. Pretty dumb of him to be as hostile as he was once he saw that she had a can out.
Also, lol at the faggot reddit mods.
"I am happily banning gross MF’ers leaving comments that are sexist and/or that sexualize minors. 😁
ETA All you banned creepers, misogynists, predators and weirdos won’t have success tryin to slide in my DM to harass the mod that banned y’all. Sorry not fuckin sorry."
I know they're dressed in a youthful way but it's not clear at all to me that they are minors. Can't see enough of their faces to make a very accurate judgement but from what I can see I would guess that they are more likely 18-22 than <18. |
|
Date: July 10th, 2026 4:14 PM Author: slippery garnet ceo background story you just fucking hit me!
Women should not be allowed outdoors |