"AI" has leveled the playing field between idiot lawyers and smart lawyers
| Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/27/26 | | Frutiger Aero | 07/27/26 | | average/ordinary/typical citizen/person | 07/27/26 | | gunnerretttired | 07/27/26 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/27/26 | | gunnerretttired | 07/27/26 | | femgooner meta scientist | 07/27/26 | | have you eve looked at a quarter | 07/27/26 | | 1 Fat Englishman I Fuck Anything - | 07/27/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 27th, 2026 8:11 PM Author: Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband (oppose bitchbois)
"AI" has a long way to go before it can truly be useful for our type of practice, but it's been a real boost for shitlawyers and for biglawyers who are dumb.
We have some small cases now and then, and sometimes big cases with idiots on the other side. Once I got the feel for opposing counsel's abilities, it used to be easy to make arguments that weren't exactly winning arguments, but you could cite a whole bunch of shit and use fancy words, and pretty well count on the other side not to be able to respond effectively, or find the right cases undermining the argument. But it's a pain now because even legit idiots can feed your brief into a machine that's way smarter than they are, and find the weaknesses that they never would have detected on their own.
It's not FAIR anymore.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886828&forum_id=2)#50028196)
|
Date: July 27th, 2026 8:18 PM Author: femgooner meta scientist
lol
god you're such a dumb lame faggot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886828&forum_id=2)#50028243) |
|
|