\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Real Q for lawmos: why don't you just do 100% race/gender based voir dire?

and don't say "it's not allowed!!" who gives a shi...
Gloostick
  09/04/26
i dont think is that simple because being conservative/lib i...
VoteRepublican
  09/04/26
don't they do this already
husbando
  09/04/26
idk do they? that's why i'm asking I would think there is...
Gloostick
  09/04/26
iirc they get a certain number of strikes no questions asked...
husbando
  09/04/26
You're not allowed to do that not flame lmao
robe nigger
  09/04/26
you aren't asking "is anyone here a stupid nigger"...
Gloostick
  09/04/26
They legit don't let you have fewer than certain amounts of ...
robe nigger
  09/04/26
can't do it imo
coolgod
  09/04/26
this is the near future. juries filled with murderously r...
Michael Stonebreaker
  09/04/26
It's like 75% that. You wouldn't think you'd need 25% for o...
the walter white of this generation (walt jr.)
  09/04/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 9:49 PM
Author: Gloostick

and don't say "it's not allowed!!" who gives a shit

like this clancy thing should just be both sides trying to kick out as many women or men as possible

white kid murdered by a nigger = try to boot every nigger you can (or vice versa)

some are more objective but seems like a ton of instances just being racist and sexist is a far more effective heuristic than whatever bullshit else you could think of

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116785)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 9:52 PM
Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?)

i dont think is that simple because being conservative/lib is randomly distributed even for x gender y race

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116788)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 9:52 PM
Author: husbando

don't they do this already

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116787)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 9:53 PM
Author: Gloostick

idk do they? that's why i'm asking

I would think there is a whole art to asking questions that are functionally proxies for "are you a stupid nigger"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116791)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 9:56 PM
Author: husbando

iirc they get a certain number of strikes no questions asked so of course this is what they do I forget the rest

am not a practicing lawyer fwiw this was CA many years ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116797)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 9:53 PM
Author: robe nigger

You're not allowed to do that not flame lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116792)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 10:03 PM
Author: Gloostick

you aren't asking "is anyone here a stupid nigger" you're asking questions that let you pick the stupid niggers for removal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116804)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 10:17 PM
Author: robe nigger

They legit don't let you have fewer than certain amounts of nigs and browns and women on the jury. It's an actual rule. The rationale for dinging them doesn't even matter. Think of it like disparate impact

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116814)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 9:53 PM
Author: coolgod

can't do it imo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116793)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 9:59 PM
Author: Michael Stonebreaker

this is the near future.

juries filled with murderously racially resentful 90IQ foreign-born nons presided over by dreadlocked 93IQ judges.

diversity is our strength.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116798)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 10:06 PM
Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.)

It's like 75% that. You wouldn't think you'd need 25% for other shit but you'd be shocked how many people come in and say that (e.g.) millionaires who are accused of committing tax evasion are all guilty of tons of other shit too and deserve to be hanged in the street.

But you can't realistically get an all-woman jury; I've tried a couple times and didn't even get close (and on the most prominent example I can think of they elected one of the 3 women to be foreman and she totally hung my guy). You also can't get a "young" jury.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2)#50116807)