Was talking to this fat cuck named cowgod the other day, & I realized something
| aromatic pink space | 06/07/26 | | Dull site | 06/07/26 | | aromatic pink space | 06/07/26 | | Dull site | 06/07/26 | | Magical Frum Bawdyhouse | 06/07/26 | | aromatic pink space | 06/07/26 | | galvanic community account cruise ship | 06/07/26 | | aromatic pink space | 06/07/26 | | Magical Frum Bawdyhouse | 06/07/26 | | galvanic community account cruise ship | 06/07/26 | | Dull site | 06/07/26 | | galvanic community account cruise ship | 06/07/26 | | Dull site | 06/07/26 | | galvanic community account cruise ship | 06/07/26 | | Dull site | 06/07/26 | | aromatic pink space | 06/08/26 | | galvanic community account cruise ship | 06/07/26 | | Dull site | 06/07/26 | | galvanic community account cruise ship | 06/07/26 | | aromatic pink space | 06/08/26 | | galvanic community account cruise ship | 06/08/26 | | Dull site | 06/08/26 | | Magical Frum Bawdyhouse | 06/07/26 | | Light Learning Disabled Step-uncle's House French Chef | 06/07/26 | | galvanic community account cruise ship | 06/08/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 7th, 2026 3:16 PM Author: aromatic pink space
the best way to test AI's ability at human persuasion is to set up identical tinder (etc.) profiles and have various levels of organic chad compete against chatGPT and claude and see who gets the best nudes, meetups, promises to do depraved sex acts, etc.
What got me thinking about this is how whenever there's a big pro-AI / AI skeptics are deluded thread, it's always ugly short poor losers like cowgod (who's cuck dad died of diabetes!) hanging onto their last strands of hair with daily dutasteride leading the charge, probably because IRL no one would ever follow them.
So I support this rigorous testing so I don't have to hear another 5'8" faggot who makes $172K/yr. and whose wife cheats on him tell me that actually AI writes great briefs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2).#49920440) |
Date: June 7th, 2026 7:19 PM Author: Magical Frum Bawdyhouse
an LLM could definitely out-compete human seducers (text-only) if trained on the proper data
it wouldn't even be close actually
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2).#49920940) |
 |
Date: June 8th, 2026 1:06 AM Author: aromatic pink space
Even if true (again, it's empirically not), it's short term thinking as these things are clearly becoming autonomous.
But you see it in legal practice: dudes who used to write 2-page, numbered-paragraph briefs that began with COMES NOW and cited only "US. Consti. amendment IV" are now putting together 8-page bangers that cite the seminal case law in the field. Moving their work-product quality from an 8/100 to a 43 on a normalized distribution. There's just no way that a competent brief-writer can possibly extract that level of improvement over baseline from AI.
... Or are you literally just making the point that "a smart person will get better results, in an absolute sense, than a dumb person," vs. measuring value over non-AI baseline? Because yes I agree that proposition is so obvious even a fat prediabetic cuck like cowgod would understand it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2).#49921821) |
 |
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:10 PM Author: Magical Frum Bawdyhouse
i don't see how this is responsive
something like "convincing women to send nudes given a dataset of male picture + bio and female picture + bio" is the exact kind of thing that a neural network would be super good at if you actually trained one for it using the appropriate data
of course the training data is a relevant and important part of the equation. agentic LLM systems will become better and better at different tasks as they're post-trained by specific data sets for different tasks. that's already how they've gotten way better at stuff like coding
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2).#49921051) |
|
|