2015-2026

Killed by Jews and their sycophants

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751282)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751396)

CR, same thing.

Except for the fact that in retrospect, "Trusting The Plan" has ended up being shown to be a retarded strategy that would have led you badly astray time and time again over the last decade, whereas "Following Nick" has been almost universally vindicated as a smart and prescient approach to take during the same period.

But otherwise CR, basically the same thing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751402)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751413)

what has he vacillated on?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751432)

"He was wrong about Kanye"

Which part, specifically? The part where he claimed that Kanye openly pushing antisemitism constituted a cultural watershed moment for youth in America on that topic? Because from where I'm sitting, that looks downright prescient. Even after getting cancelled by the Jews, Kanye still remains arguably the single most popular living musical artist in the world today and all of the public polling suggests that rates of antisemitism have skyrocketed since he started openly calling out kikes (btw Candace Owens, who is one of the most popular and influential podcasters in the world, also directly credits Kanye with pushing her to become openly antisemitic in her own right)...

"He was wrong about Red Wave 2022"

I legitimately don't remember this and I'm too lazy to search for it, so OK maybe. Let's just assume you're correct, he got one political prediction wrong (along with a bunch of other commentators) 4 years ago. Damn, terrible.

"He claimed Trump couldn't win the primary"

I'm assuming you're talking about 2024, because he literally rose to prominence being ALL IN on Trump 2016. I don't remember Nick Fuentes ever claiming that Trump couldn't win the 2024 primary, and that's much more recent and I was regularly watching his full shows by that time. Incidentally, ChatGPT doesn't seem to be able to source this claim, either: "There is no widely documented instance of Nick Fuentes claiming that Donald Trump could not win the 2024 Republican primaries." Odd case. Since you're making the claim and ChatGPT can't verify it, can you provide a source to some actual video clips where Nick Fuentes said this?

Anything else?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751511)

I legitimately love subthreads like this because they only ever move in one direction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751540)

many other people may seem more accurate at predicting and influencing politics, but that's just because they're not operating at the hundred year level like Nick Fuentes. Trust The Plan.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751546)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751561)

"He got Kanye elected"

Did Nick Fuentes ever predict that Kanye would win the 2024 election? If so, link? I'm pretty sure that supporting someone's protest candidacy out of principle =! making a prediction they will actually win an election.

"Hey got Kamala elected"

See above, same comment and request.

"Many other people seem more accurate at predicting politics"

Can you name a few of these specific individuals you have in mind, so we can all go independently evaluate their track records ourselves and come to our own conclusions?

And once again... are there any other specific examples you'd like to call out where Nick Fuentes was retarded and wrong?

Because so far it almost seems like you're pathetically grasping at straws, but surely that can't be case. I mean, you confidently assured us above that this guy is constantly flipflopping and making retarded predictions about all sorts of topics, so it should be incredibly easy for you to drop a bunch of egregious recent examples on us to underscore that point!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751562)

Wow... damn, it sounds like ackkkkkkkshually, if you REALLY think about it, Nick Fuentes is constantly switching up his positions in an inconsistent manner and saying dumb shit which ends up getting proven wrong. You sound like you've done the homework and regularly listen to his show in full, so we can assume that really know what's up with his stuff.

For the benefit of those who don't carefully follow him and only see his self-selected reel clips, can you hammer this point home by calling out a few of the most egregious specific examples of this disturbing phenomenon?

I think we should help make sure that those folks don't continue to fall for his shameless sophistry moving forward!

TYVMIA, brother.

:)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751443)

it largely boils down to what you're doing right now -- misrepresentations and bad faith.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751754)

Goyim In Abundance

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751322)

People overlook this too easily. Like people who said they were "wrong" to oppose the initial Iran strikes just because they didn't result in what is happening now

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751727)

trump being fooled into an all out war (that looks unwinnable), supporting antisemitism legislation, throwing out based foreign students who hate israel but allowing jeet students to displace american students, along with all teh other boomertard horseshit he does has just accelerated the noticing, which was inevitably going to happen anyway.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751470)

Alea iacta est

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751501)

https://dnyuz.com/2020/11/16/trump-sought-options-for-attacking-iran-to-stop-its-growing-nuclear-program/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49752234)

even if we send in troops and it lasts a long time and thousands of americans die

that's still way way way better than having kamala in charge, open borders, and commies taking over things

a war with iran can accomplish a lot of good or it can be a disaster, but it's a disaster that the usa can recover from

open borders like biden was doing is something we cannot recover from. corruption like biden was doing is something we might not be able to recover from

durr durr durr vote against the republicans because...i'm mad! wahhhhhh!!! jews!!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751737)

Here's the bad news. They're going to lose in the primary. The party is split in two and there's no going back. And your side is in the minority.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49751774)

i'll vote for a wussy republican over a democrat every time

unless the republican is weak on the 2a. then i won't vote for either.

this idea that you abandon your side because they aren't 100% in lockstep is really really fucking stupid.

what does that make fuentes? that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49752312)

*farts cum*

Do you just believe in all pro Trump propaganda that appears on your screen? Has poasting on XO for 20 years not taught you anything about having a healthy dose of skepticism about official narratives?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49752371)

What's crazy about sealclubber is that there are millions of boomercons out there who share his views and believe everything they see on Fox News, all the propaganda. What's weird about him is that he's under 50 and he's here. That's what's out of place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49752391)

i think levin is excellent.

wilkow is probably my favorite. he and shapiro tend to bring the most interesting takes on issues

i don't like everything about any of them. i dislike things about all of them. big deal.

all of you candace, tucker, and fuentes people. they have interesting takes, but also some really fucking stupid takes. the ones i mention above don't. whether you agree or disagree with them, they aren't retarded. candace-jews! erica did it!; tucker-russia is great! ufos! jews!; fuentes-jews! vote dem! those are really retarded takes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5846803&forum_id=2).#49753375)