When A.I. Becomes An Enemy – Connor Leahy
| raped/touched/licked/fucked | 09/16/26 | | and that leads to a broader point | 09/16/26 | | raped/touched/licked/fucked | 09/16/26 | | S'mores-flavored cold brew | 09/16/26 | | raped/touched/licked/fucked | 09/16/26 | | S'mores-flavored cold brew | 09/16/26 | | raped/touched/licked/fucked | 09/16/26 | | S'mores-flavored cold brew | 09/16/26 | | raped/touched/licked/fucked | 09/16/26 | | S'mores-flavored cold brew | 09/16/26 | | raped/touched/licked/fucked | 09/16/26 | | Wilbur in the Godhead | 09/16/26 | | bald faggot murderer | 09/16/26 | | S'mores-flavored cold brew | 09/16/26 | | bald faggot murderer | 09/16/26 | | S'mores-flavored cold brew | 09/16/26 | | bald faggot murderer | 09/16/26 | | raped/touched/licked/fucked | 09/16/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 16th, 2026 3:56 PM Author: S'mores-flavored cold brew (gunneratttt)
He thinks that the problem is a lack of awareness and uses nuclear weapons as an example of how humanity rose to the occassion against an existential threat. But the way that was solved is nuclear powers built so many that it made the threat of nuclear war the same as human extinction. Meanwhile, nations the didn't develop weapons are now exploited by nuclear powers.
Just like climate change and nukes, AI can't be solved unless there is worldwide cooperation and non-compliant countries are forced to comply. This is unthinkable right now. If we did stop developing we would just be taken over by a country that didn't.
It's the same reason AI companies are racing toward developing them while warning everyone about the risks. They don't dissolve their own companies because they know someone else will develop it in their stead, and they'd rather be the ones in control and profiting.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5904334&forum_id=2,5#50138451) |
 |
Date: September 16th, 2026 4:20 PM Author: S'mores-flavored cold brew (gunneratttt)
He has the same thinking as climate change activists that if he raises awareness perhaps the people in charge will do something. I think its just motivated by wanting to do something instead of nothing, even if it's futile. At least it makes more sense for him to do it because the risks of AI are still poorly understood.
It's like a prisoners dilemma with billions of prisoners. AI is even harder to solve than climate change and nukes because it's really hard for a small group of people to irreparably fuck up the climate or build a nuke. How do you stop a handful of people from doing it anyway? Start restricting chips the same way we do as uranium?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5904334&forum_id=2,5#50138467)
|
Date: September 16th, 2026 4:16 PM Author: bald faggot murderer
this topic is already tiresome and played out
you're either preaching about the real danger of gradual disempowerment, shilling for AI/tech interests, or doing engagement bait "discourse" for clicks. this guy being in the latter category
nobody who talks about sudden takeover by AI is a serious person
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5904334&forum_id=2,5#50138461) |
|
|