him sperging out about this shit proof of what a farce "political science" is. 99.9% of political science professors believe kamala was a great candidate and deserved to win. this is like being an engineering professor and every bridge you've designed collapsed immediately.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48348365)

according to economists the biden economy was the best in history

according to political scientists both clinton and kamala were shoe ins to win their elections

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48348386)

wait two weeks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48348781)

I think you may be forgetting that he is a scientist.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48348319)

Academia and government get a lot of crap in general relative to private businesses, among them NEWS OUTLETS, but also everything that happens at any corporation that isn’t 100% strictly Engineering is bullshit and fake and basically a plot to fuck over customers and white male Loser employees imo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48348354)

anyway, i took modern drama and the prof was a MASSIVE shitlib, like super marxist wackadoo nonsense and he'd preach it to us.

he was telling us one day that the patriarchy extends everywhere you see man, they even used to think that male frogs chose their mates and the SCIENCE later proved that it's the females.

this chick drama student raised her hand and said "okay, so what are you telling us here? there's a frog conspiracy?"

the class erupted in laughter and the prof said "NO. i am TRYING to TEACH YOU PEOPLE that the patriarchy controls everything" and he went off on her for a couple more minutes, but he ended with "the patriarchy controls everything" and the chick said "i see that, for example in this fucking class" and she got up and left. it was 180.

the professor was clearly a pseduointellectual shitlib faggot who was not comfortable with anyone questioning his retarded ass talking points. kinda like lichtman! oh and the guy made $45k in 1999.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48348370)

UMD was pretty chill man. fucking HUGE. they had a spring concert every year (they still might) and in 1998 i went to it and saw RUN DMC, the roots and the junkyard gang or whatever (remember that we aint nothin but mammals song?)

i later represented UMD in labor matters. i had a great track record. I tried two cases before the state higher ed labor relations board and kicked the shit out of the union both times. they couldn't come with me when i left biglaw, bc they had a "contract" with my firm and couldn't move their work. huge bummer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48348412)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48349269)

and then being like "The 49ers will certainly beat the Chiefs because they have an edge in my opinion in 4 of the 7 categories"

and then the game goes to overtime and Mahomes throws a 97 yard TD, and then the analyst acting butt hurt like "the keys to the game did not fail me Patrick Mahomes failed me!"

it's clown show level stupid

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48349103)

so, you see, he's only wrong if there is fraud or "disinformation" has caused the stupid masses to vote wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5635727&forum_id=2,5#48349227)