The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Did a man walk on the moon: YES or NO?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:51 PM Author: Roland Kohl (Diesel Mechanic) I think we've been lied to our entire lives. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062306) |
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:52 PM Author: mentally ill shut-in You could have a long discussion with AI about this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062312) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:53 PM Author: .,.,.,.,,,,.,,.,.,.,...,,..,, You’re a moron if you’re even asking this q (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062315) |
 |
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:30 AM Author: The Penis (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062694) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:57 PM Author: ''"'"''"''''"""''' yes you fucking retard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062323) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 9:09 PM Author: Roland Kohl (Diesel Mechanic) (boomer) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062361) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:58 PM Author: our age of poasting is collapsing yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062325) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:59 PM Author: coalition of rabbis No (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062327) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:24 AM Author: Roland Kohl (Diesel Mechanic) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062682) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:27 AM Author: you'd see the panties i believe yes but i wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be a hoax (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062687) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:28 AM Author: The Penis the chances of it not being real are about as close to mathematically zero as possible (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062693) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:31 AM Author: you'd see the panties i haven't actually looked into it much tbh. you are a knowledgeable and intelligent poaster so i believe you if you say it happened
does your answer change if we narrow the claim to US astronauts walking on the moon in 1969? |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:27 AM Author: The Penis Yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062689) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:28 AM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK When you look at all the other shit we did in the 50s and 60s it doesn't seem far fetched. No one doubted it at the time (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062691) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:28 AM Author: MISO HORNY Go ask Buzz Aldrin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062692) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:35 AM Author: life is a hamburger let me put it this way, and this is how any disinterested rational person would view it: there are serious questions about every piece of 'evidence' they have provided, and serious questions about the lengths they went to *not* to provide (or not to preserve in the case of the telemetry data, etc) irrefutable, unequivocal evidence supporting a claim as incredible as 'we went to the moon.'
every piece of evidence, without exception, is dubious on many levels, flimsy.
this makes any rational person begin to wonder. |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:43 AM Author: The Penis Almost any historical event can be made to look suspicious if you isolate each piece of evidence and demand that it be individually “irrefutable” and “unequivocal.” It’s a typical crank pattern to list off objections to individual pieces of evidence like that without inheriting the explanatory burden of an alternate hypothesis. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062706) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:44 AM Author: nasa cgi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062708) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:49 AM Author: our age of poasting is collapsing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062710) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:52 AM Author: life is a hamburger all the more reason for them to have planned ahead and provided strong evidence, rather than simply saying: "hey, we took these 5 cropped photos that look exactly like the Lost in Space TV show set we just happened to build for 'astronaut training' at NASA which is visible in other pre-mission photos. anyway, gotta go!"
it would have been very simple to avoid/mitigate the controversy. instead, they went out of their way not to avoid it (by providing only the weakest possible forms of evidence), which any rational person would find suspect. |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 1:44 AM Author: Roland Kohl (Diesel Mechanic) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062770) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 8:08 AM Author: https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png (gunneratttt) We can literally bounce lasers off the reflectors we placed on the moon.
Moon landing deniers are closer to flat earthers. There is unanimous third party cooberation from every international space program (including hostile nations that have every incentive to deny it if it was possible) that we landed on the moon. To believe it is fake means you must think that you've uncovered a massive, unanimous, international conspiracy. This is absurd on it's face, moreso that you're just some shithead and not a rocket scientist who can actually make an in intellient analysis of the data. |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 8:17 AM Author: life is a hamburger the 'reflectors' don't prove that anyone 'walked on the moon' and drove go-carts on the moon as claimed. multiple reflectors have been placed on the moon (and on Mars) without requiring a manned landing. people who bring them up are dimwits.
the 'evidence' of a moonwalk amounts to the following argument: 'Uh, if we HAD in fact faked the landing, surely the Russians would have said something! So QED! That proves we did it.'
plus: a few very dodgy photos and the retarded 'feather drop.'
that's it? it's very weak evidence, objectively. anyone who cannot admit this is not worth engaging. |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 8:19 AM Author: https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png (gunneratttt) Please identify yourself so I can disregard everything you say from now on. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062976) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 8:21 AM Author: life is a hamburger you're very snarky for a retarded turd (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062980) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 8:27 AM Author: https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png (gunneratttt) Why are you reluctant to ascribe your already anonymous xoxo moniker to this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062986) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 7:36 AM Author: ''"'"''"''''"""''' this used to be a high IQ bort (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062941) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 7:56 AM Author: ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,. yeah; this isn't in any particular doubt. especially since it was repeated several times over several years. the retroreflectors are still up there; you can ping them with the right equipment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062962) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 8:03 AM Author: cowgod All during the Nixon admin. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062968) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 10:46 AM Author: Gay Grandpa I cant define stupid but I know it when I see it Your poast is it |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 8:03 AM Author: cowgod I still can’t see an argument against the video of them fucking around with the interior of the ship to seemingly make the earth look further away. I’ve never seen anyone try to address that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062966) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 10:12 AM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK Shot with a wide angle lens? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50063154) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 10:47 AM Author: Gay Grandpa Link to that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50063232) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 8:32 AM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) no i think its too hard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50062995) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 10:10 AM Author: ''"'"''"''''"""''' this is basically what this conspiracy theory boils down to. cons know it would be too hard for them so they naturally conclude it would be impossible for high IQ human engineers to do it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50063149) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 10:49 AM Author: Gay Grandpa On the contrary as a simpleton I see amazing people do incredible shit all day long that advance humanity, like the covid vaccines, and I take them at their word completely (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50063235) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 10:50 AM Author: Rickys' Cat I dont believe it happened in the 1960s. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2,5#50063236) |