\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Ecclesiastes as the First Phenomenological Record of Life Under a God of Totalit

This essay argues that the oscillation running through Eccle...
Consuela
  07/22/26
looking forward to MIG & lex comments
Consuela
  07/22/26
tp
Frutiger Aero
  07/22/26
LOL. Much study is a great weariness until the flesh, and of...
OldHLSDude
  07/22/26
this is zozo, scholarship is appreciated, anyway what else i...
Consuela
  07/22/26
he literally and directly answers this in the text of the bo...
nude litigator
  07/22/26
...
Ricky
  07/22/26
scholarship is my heleq, champ
Consuela
  07/22/26
Retardmaxxing leads to Achilles' final end. Full of regret t...
.,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,.
  07/22/26
zozo is pretty much Hell. Full of daemons.
OldHLSDude
  07/22/26
sounds like your irl is worse w/ 2 schizos
Consuela
  07/22/26
Toss up
OldHLSDude
  07/22/26
wow
Consuela
  07/22/26
...
Ricky
  07/22/26
...
Consuela
  07/22/26
180
Frutiger Aero
  07/22/26
...
Frutiger Aero
  07/22/26
The obvious objection is that you're offering a corrective t...
have you ever looked at a quarter
  07/22/26
I'm not arguing Qohelet should have projected evil into God,...
Consuela
  07/22/26
You didn't answer my question. Given that no one with a pass...
have you ever looked at a quarter
  07/22/26
because reading a text through a lens its author couldn't co...
Consuela
  07/22/26
again, no one with a passing familiarly with the text would ...
have you ever looked at a quarter
  07/22/26
I think Consuela's position here is reasonable. Your objecti...
The Penis
  07/23/26
...
The Penis
  07/23/26
...
Consuela
  07/23/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 1:11 PM
Author: Consuela

This essay argues that the oscillation running through Ecclesiastes - praised by some as literary paradox, dismissed by others as unresolved pessimism - is the phenomenological record of someone performing the crucifixion of opposites under a god-image that contains evil without the vocabulary to name what it contains. Qohelet is stranded between a polytheistic solution no longer available within the monotheistic tradition he was writing inside, and an individuation vocabulary not yet invented, which is why the text can only oscillate rather than resolve.

https://livingopposites.substack.com/p/the-earliest-crucifixion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50016914)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 1:49 PM
Author: Consuela

looking forward to MIG & lex comments

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017001)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 3:07 PM
Author: Frutiger Aero

tp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017168)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 4:56 PM
Author: OldHLSDude

LOL. Much study is a great weariness until the flesh, and of making many books there is no end.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017382)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 4:58 PM
Author: Consuela

this is zozo, scholarship is appreciated, anyway what else is there to do

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017385)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 5:04 PM
Author: nude litigator

he literally and directly answers this in the text of the book you're supposedly analysing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017402)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 5:05 PM
Author: Ricky



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017406)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 5:06 PM
Author: Consuela

scholarship is my heleq, champ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017415)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 5:31 PM
Author: .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,.


Retardmaxxing leads to Achilles' final end. Full of regret that he fought pointless battles. In Hades, with infinite time and a deep sense of meaningless, the definition of Hell.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017476)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 5:53 PM
Author: OldHLSDude

zozo is pretty much Hell. Full of daemons.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017531)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 5:58 PM
Author: Consuela

sounds like your irl is worse w/ 2 schizos

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017541)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 6:12 PM
Author: OldHLSDude

Toss up

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017592)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 6:13 PM
Author: Consuela

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017595)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 6:26 PM
Author: Ricky



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017632)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 7:03 PM
Author: Consuela



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017723)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 6:16 PM
Author: Frutiger Aero

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017601)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 6:16 PM
Author: Frutiger Aero



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017602)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 7:36 PM
Author: have you ever looked at a quarter

The obvious objection is that you're offering a corrective to the text by suggesting the author should have projected evil into God, but he didn't because he "didn't have the vocabulary." This just doesn't stand up as a piece of historical criticism, which is what you're purporting to be doing here. I doubt any old testament scholar would agree with your interpretation. So why bother reading a biblical text to just read your personal metaphysics back into it? Why does this text need to say what you want it to say for you to be right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017798)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 7:41 PM
Author: Consuela

I'm not arguing Qohelet should have projected evil into God, I'm arguing his god-image already contains both. yes, you're right that OT scholars have not utilized a framework like this -- that's discussed right in the post, because pretty much everyone approaches their analysis from a redemptive framework whereas I don't

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017804)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 7:49 PM
Author: have you ever looked at a quarter

You didn't answer my question. Given that no one with a passing familiarity with the text would agree with you, why bother misinterpreting it to support your personal worldview?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017830)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 7:59 PM
Author: Consuela

because reading a text through a lens its author couldn't consciously have held is a different kind of reading. I'm upfront in the post that this isn't conventional historical-critical work, it's asking what psychological condition produces this specific oscillation. You can disagree that's worth doing, but it's not "misinterpreting to support my worldview" - the god-image containing both good and evil is already in the text

your response, btw, was nasty in its phrasing and betrays a closed, rigid mindset

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017855)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 22nd, 2026 8:03 PM
Author: have you ever looked at a quarter

again, no one with a passing familiarly with the text would think this is a reasonable reading. you're doing some kind of performance art where you assume a worldview and then go out and interpret things according to it. it's what all the great hacks have always done. it's not serious work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50017869)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 23rd, 2026 11:27 AM
Author: The Penis

I think Consuela's position here is reasonable. Your objection is like dismissing a Heideggerian reading of Antigone because it isn’t a critical edition of the Greek. Every thick reading of Ecclesiastes does what he is doing and it's not like he tries to hide it. He declares the lens and doesn't pretend it is a historical reading. Not saying I agree with his reading either. It's more that once he says he is doing a phenomnological/depth psychology reading, you can't really make this criticism.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50019005)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 23rd, 2026 7:29 AM
Author: The Penis



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50018696)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 23rd, 2026 11:09 AM
Author: Consuela



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5885127&forum_id=2/#50018997)