The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is there any non-silly non-delusion argument for why AI is a "scam"?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 6th, 2026 12:51 PM Author: The Penis If the goal was just to produce a machine that's more intelligent than humans then the goal has already been met and exceeded. So I don't see any serious intellectual argument for it being flame other than arguments that divert to whether it replaces human workers or not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918565) |
 |
Date: June 6th, 2026 12:57 PM Author: Smoker It’s not a “scam” but what may be a scam is that it suddenly replaces the whole white collar labor force. Right now it is just enhances productivity. Technically, there’s an argument to be made that it increases the value of labor. No one really knows, but it makes sense if one engineer is suddenly worth ten engineers that you want to hire even more engineers / pay them more. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918579) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:01 PM Author: The Penis Yeah I agree that it isn't going to replace the labor force. Human institutions exist for reasons other than cognitive labor, and AI is augmentation driven at this point. But AI not causing everyone to stop working is very different from saying it is flame. The main point of AI is to create a thinking machine and that has already been done so it isn't flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918593) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:04 PM Author: Dan Bilzerian It's been replacing some low level shitjerbs for a while now, but nothing highly skilled. Anyone who got replaced by AI can find a jerb at Home Depot or UPS (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918601) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:11 PM Author: The Penis Yeah that still makes it sound like AI has only replaced dumb people though and will some day maybe replace everyone else. But in reality AI is already more intelligent than the smartest surgeons at problem solving and reasoning by a wide margin. So it is really just about whether what you do is coupled to real world physical consequences or social systems. But again AI doesn't even have to replace humans to be legit anyway.
Deep sea saturation divers, weapons test engineers, venomous animal handlers etc are also now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more prestigious than lawyers, professors and software engineers until we build actual physical robots that are intelligent. |
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:01 PM Author: .,.,.;;,;.,;:,:,,:,.,:,::,..;.,:,.:;.:.,;.:.,:.::, everyone who makes this argument does not come from a world in which its material benefits are obvious and measurable, all they see is a machine that can generate writing and videos, and they are very happy to conclude from that that it is all slop. which is true from what they see of it but is also a relieving thought that they're happy not to interrogate any further.
if they had any serious experience coding or doing drug discovery or anything similar they'd understand that this question of "being as smart as a human" or "moving beyond slop" is not the point, it's enough for it to be a several-orders-of-mangitude step up in processing power and an opening up of the ways in which humans can tap into it with natural language. |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:05 PM Author: The Penis A lot of the slop is from older models too or is artwork. The stuff it produces can be clunky aesthetically for a human but doesn't mean it isn't powerful as a reasoning engine. It solves problems humans could never solve practically on it's own now and it augments humans in ways that massively increase throughput. That's enough. Replacing jobs is a different thing, because you can use it to just do more. Although it will obviously displace some people when people realize it's better to have one senior with AI instead of hiring a bunch of juniors (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918603) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:26 PM Author: cowgod63&1/3 i believe ai has awe-inspiring potential and will eventually completely overhaul the human labor market, perhaps ultimately in a manner more sweeping than the industrial revolution. that said, people are still often wont to proclaim it a “scam” because loudmouth midwits like op are frantically running around for no discernible reason saying stupid things like it is already “orders of magnitude more intelligent” than humans. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918610) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:45 PM Author: The Penis This is a low iq take. Orders of magnitude more intelligent than humans is already measurable and arguable if you declare what metrics you are using to define intelligence. Eventually more sweeping than the industrial revolution in terms of labor market dynamics is just speculation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918627) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:52 PM Author: cowgod63&1/3 “actually, my argument is correct if you unquestioningly accept my retarded postulates.” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918635) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:00 PM Author: The Penis I'm not saying you can't question them. But come on. When you build a system that doesn't have the cognitive bottlenecks of humans and has absorbed millions of books, has essentially instantaneous retrieval, no forgetting from interference, no fatigue, and the ability to operate across hundreds of domains. Plus this thing is finding proofs Erdos missed, finding counterexamples Erdos missed, connecting fields Erdos never connected, and doing so while simultaneously being competent in thousands of other domains. Erdos was already at the extreme tail of the human population. When you take these things into account does orders of magnitude really sound so crazy? We always measured human IQ with tests like the old gre and old lsat (before they got nerfed) and AI has been able to max those for several generations now. When AI dominates these tests, it is special pleading to suddenly declare that those measures no longer count merely because the performer is nonhuman. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918671) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:07 PM Author: cowgod63&1/3 current ai models are not (at least yet) independent agents. they are tools. is a casio calculator watch “more intelligent” than a human because of its mathematical processing power? is a microsoft encarta cd-rom “more intelligent” than a human because of its breadth of “knowledge” and perfect recall? the answer to both of those questions is not “no” because the questions aren’t even validly formed in the first place. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918712) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:16 PM Author: The Penis That analogy is just bad. A casio calculator is superhuman at arithmetic, but it isn't doing general reasoning. It doesn't parse a novel natural language problem, decide which abstraction applies, test solution paths, explain the result etc. Encarta has stored information, but AI is not merely retrieving info from a database, it is drawing inference and integrating across a compressed statistical representation of a massive corpus and it can answer novel questions by doing it. Calculators and Encyclopedias requires humans to formulate the problem 100% of the way. But with frontier AI humans are outsourcing parts of the cognitive process that were always traditionally considered Intellectual Work.
Tool not an agent also doesn't refute cognitive ability. Agency and intelligence are separable. You don't need autonomy, persistent goals, phenomenology or any of that nonsense to have reasoning, abstraction and problem solving ability. You are just goalpost moving to things that fall outside of what has traditionally been defined as "intelligence". Calculators and encyclopedias require humans to formulate the problem 100%. With frontier AI humans are outsourcing parts of the process that were always traditionally considered Intellectual Work. |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:22 PM Author: TurboGrafx-67 wtf are you smoking? Google agentic orchestration and then go outside and touch the ground (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918767) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:32 PM Author: cowgod You need to separate your issues imo
Highly powerful tool circa 2026: yes
Future state (not 2026, maybe 2030s): perhaps unimaginably powerful if it can Engineer things insanely quickly: yes
Insane resource hog: yes. Which kind of defeats the purpose or limits the upside imho
A Scam: maybe, because literally everything “big tech” norcal SV Nerds have ever done for the last 25 years has been either a failure (google glass, metaverse) or not value accretive. Or it just Destroyed newspapers in a way that adds no real value. They transferred value to themselves rather than creating new value. I don’t think “tech companies” have ever “developed technology” afaik
|
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:46 PM Author: The Penis "Scam" is besides the point when it has already been built and it works. Of course everything is a scam to some extent in that people are constantly trying to sell things to other people they don't need or want. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918628) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:55 PM Author: cowgod The point imho is that with AI they’re asking you to take a leap of faith and assume that it continues to rapidly get better. And that’s a lot to ask when big tech literally fails at everything. They’ve never “done anything” other than disrupt existing industries and make themselves richer. They Fail Constantly at doing actual things while growing market cap from algorithms wreaking havoc on Proles’ brains.
The list goes on and on and on. Self-driving cars were being talked about the same way 10 years ago. It’s the same basic idea. A technology that’s technically better than humans on average in many ways but which needs Oversight. Google Glass Google+ Google Wave Google Buzz Google Allo Google Duo Google Stadia Google Reader Google Hangouts Google Talk Google Notebook Google Video Google Answers Google Health Google Lively Google Daydream Google Spaces Google Latitude Google Code Google Toolbar Google Currents Google Podcasts Google Jamboard Google Clips Project Ara Project Loon Google Fiber (national ambitions) Waymo (original timelines) Google Wallet (first version) Google TV (first version) Metaverse Horizon Worlds Facebook Home Facebook Portal Facebook Dating Libra Diem Novi Workplace Facebook Deals Facebook Credits Facebook Camera Rooms Poke Slingshot Paper Microsoft Windows Phone Zune Kinect Mixer Cortana Internet Explorer Mobile Microsoft Band Windows RT Groove Music Kin MSN Music HoloLens Bob Zune
If this tech were being driven by companies that Do Things and aren’t Jewish like Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Siemens + Konami/Capcom/Squaresoft, people would be less skeptical. “Big tech” are just Evil Nerds who add no value to anything in 25 years. Guilt by association. |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:02 PM Author: The Penis Yeah but the difference is that AI is already big at its current development point without it getting any better. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918680) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:04 PM Author: cowgod Imho it’s Almost Big. To be big, it needs to be Turn-Key. There is no Turn Key AI product. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918687) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:08 PM Author: The Penis I think it's only a matter of time now until it reaches Turn-Key status and receives the blessing of the cowgod. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918717) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:46 PM Author: Genius Bear on the loose in Japan It's a scam in the sense that it's a deliberate concentration of power by self-interested agents, to the detriment of the members of the population who are not within that coterie of self-interested agents who benefit from that artificial concentration of power (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918629) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:48 PM Author: The Penis I agree but my point is that that doesn't really matter when we already have thinking machines that are smarter than humans. That is big enough in itself to make it look silly when people try to say it's flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918631) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:53 PM Author: Genius Bear on the loose in Japan You're talking about something completely different which doesn't fall under the criticism of "scam" and would require different language and definitions in order to narrow the topic to something legible (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918636) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:03 PM Author: The Penis Well everything is. $cam. My point is that it isn't flame in the sense that the tech is real. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918682) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:05 PM Author: Genius Bear on the loose in Japan Should have used the word "flame" instead of "scam" then, Champ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918697) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:06 PM Author: The Penis That's fair. I have no problem admitting tech companies are $cammy in how they market and hype products. But I stand by my statement that AI is Not Flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918707) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 1:55 PM Author: .,.,.;;,;.,;:,:,,:,.,:,::,..;.,:,.:;.:.,;.:.,:.::, in other words it's a "scam" in the sense that you want to assign words with negative connotations to shit you don't like. fucken brilliant mate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918648) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:01 PM Author: Genius Bear on the loose in Japan The accurate version of this response would be that I want to assign words with negative connotations to things that harm me and my interests (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918672) |
|
Date: June 6th, 2026 2:09 PM Author: TurboGrafx-67 It's only a "scam" in that the compute power to drive current AI usage isn't sustainable at cost but the elite/institutional class and top 1% are ok with burning all that cash for now because over 99.999% of the benefits of AI will flow upstream to their pockets. But this isn't breaking news insofar as elections, taxes, stock market, popular media etc are all part of the same huge scam (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871621&forum_id=2/#49918720) |