\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

If we are being real Claude Fable is smarter than humans

anyone who denies this is delusional. it doesn't dominate ev...
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/10/26
in pure logic, absolutely. but there's a lot of life that i...
copper candlestick maker persian
  07/10/26
yeah I think there are cognitive and knowledge domains human...
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/10/26
that's all fair. and i mean look i'm amazed by the technolo...
copper candlestick maker persian
  07/11/26
cr you need EPAH levels of boomerism, ignorance, and self-im...
mentally impaired sapphire shrine
  07/10/26
It is yeah it’s smarter than most humans at most thing...
Burgundy concupiscible depressive
  07/10/26
Cr but annoying that I still find a dozen mistakes Fable mak...
Insecure stage
  07/10/26
yeah same experience with super smart humans though
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/10/26
it sucks
federal box office weed whacker
  07/10/26
Maybe compared to Sol 5.6 or GLM 5.2 with 0 quantization ...
Insecure stage
  07/10/26
it didnt even know the classical argument for the privation ...
federal box office weed whacker
  07/10/26
Flame. GPT 2 could explain that argument.
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/10/26
not rigorously from first principles
federal box office weed whacker
  07/10/26
How's this from Deep Seek: Argumentum de malo ut privatio...
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/10/26
that's not from first principles
federal box office weed whacker
  07/10/26
Neither Augustine nor Aquinas constructed it from neutral fi...
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/10/26
so its not smarter than those guys
federal box office weed whacker
  07/10/26
idk they were both geniuses. hard to compare them to somethi...
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/10/26
yeah also the weird thing is they were also humans iirc
federal box office weed whacker
  07/10/26
yeah
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/11/26
https://x.com/iamblichungus/status/2075587148338581525?s=46
Burgundy concupiscible depressive
  07/10/26
kant was a total fag in this regard. hegel was a satanist
federal box office weed whacker
  07/10/26
duh. 90% of humanity is dumb as fuck.
know-it-all geriatric juggernaut
  07/10/26
Today it did a pretty shitty analyzing a damages expert repo...
Glittery elite hell
  07/10/26
"reasoning" as pertains to lots of questions is ju...
Milky National
  07/10/26
yup
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/11/26
people r anxious about AI because they don't understand know...
Milky National
  07/11/26
No one has actually used it to do anything though
umber idiot
  07/10/26
ai has invented nothing
Aphrodisiac senate scourge upon the earth
  07/11/26
I upgraded to Claude pro to ask fable some questions and it ...
Self-centered Menage Laser Beams
  07/11/26
I heard it got extended till tomorrow. Either way just use t...
Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon
  07/11/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:30 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

anyone who denies this is delusional. it doesn't dominate every human in every single setting, but it's overall intelligence is superhuman and human level intelligence is no longer the upper bound across many important cognitive domains.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992136)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:34 PM
Author: copper candlestick maker persian

in pure logic, absolutely. but there's a lot of life that isn't pure computer math -- i guess we're all about to find out how much

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992141)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:39 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

yeah I think there are cognitive and knowledge domains humans can still beat it in. but the relevant comparison isn't whether it defeats the best mathematician at mathematics or the best systems programmer at systems programming. It's whether any individual human can match its aggregate performance across a sufficiently broad distribution of tasks under comparable time and tool constraints. Probably not.

And yeah I agree with you there are plenty of tasks still outside the domain of text-based systems. But I think it can do more than just logic and computer math.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992146)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 12:27 AM
Author: copper candlestick maker persian

that's all fair. and i mean look i'm amazed by the technology too, claude fable 5 especially. genuinely not sure what the next step is. historically we've always been able to find other uses for human labor - and combined it with machines to be more productive. not quite sure yet what role humans play in some things going forward - maybe it's the fun direction type decisions idk

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992405)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:42 PM
Author: mentally impaired sapphire shrine

cr you need EPAH levels of boomerism, ignorance, and self-importance to deny this at this point

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992151)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:43 PM
Author: Burgundy concupiscible depressive

It is yeah it’s smarter than most humans at most things

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992153)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:48 PM
Author: Insecure stage

Cr but annoying that I still find a dozen mistakes Fable makes daily when I'm way dumber

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992163)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:57 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

yeah same experience with super smart humans though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992186)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:50 PM
Author: federal box office weed whacker

it sucks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992167)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:53 PM
Author: Insecure stage

Maybe compared to Sol 5.6 or GLM 5.2 with 0 quantization

LJL if you meant anything else besides that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992174)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:54 PM
Author: federal box office weed whacker

it didnt even know the classical argument for the privation theory of evil

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992180)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:57 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

Flame. GPT 2 could explain that argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992184)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 9:57 PM
Author: federal box office weed whacker

not rigorously from first principles

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992185)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 10:01 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

How's this from Deep Seek:

Argumentum de malo ut privatione

P1. Omne ens, inquantum ens, bonum est.

P2. Quidquid positive est, aliquam perfectionem sive bonitatem habet.

P3. Malum, inquantum malum, bono opponitur.

C1. Ergo malum, inquantum malum, non est ens positivum.

P4. Malum tamen non est mera negatio; nam non omnis absentia boni malum est.

P5. Malum est absentia boni debiti in subiecto quod naturaliter illius boni capax est.

P6. Absentia boni debiti in subiecto capaci privatio dicitur.

C2. Ergo malum est privatio boni debiti in subiecto bono.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992192)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 10:22 PM
Author: federal box office weed whacker

that's not from first principles

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992217)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 10:29 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

Neither Augustine nor Aquinas constructed it from neutral first principles either.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992228)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 10:32 PM
Author: federal box office weed whacker

so its not smarter than those guys

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992237)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 11:37 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

idk they were both geniuses. hard to compare them to something like fable though, considering they didn't have access to any modern knowledge systems.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992346)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 11:40 PM
Author: federal box office weed whacker

yeah also the weird thing is they were also humans iirc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992351)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 12:03 AM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

yeah

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992377)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 10:04 PM
Author: Burgundy concupiscible depressive

https://x.com/iamblichungus/status/2075587148338581525?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992198)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 10:20 PM
Author: federal box office weed whacker

kant was a total fag in this regard. hegel was a satanist

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992211)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 10:03 PM
Author: know-it-all geriatric juggernaut

duh. 90% of humanity is dumb as fuck.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992195)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 11:04 PM
Author: Glittery elite hell

Today it did a pretty shitty analyzing a damages expert report for daubert issues. It got very focused on slight mathematical rounding errors while missing the egregious problems with the expert analysis.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992290)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 11:30 PM
Author: Milky National

"reasoning" as pertains to lots of questions is just a matter of working through the bottleneck of processing power to reach a deterministic end point. this is why AI was able to solve that erdos problem, it was able to work through possible paths to a solution that were too much and too overwhelming for humans to easily manage. AI will blow humans out of the water in anything that resembles this kind of work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992333)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 12:03 AM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

yup

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992378)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 12:32 AM
Author: Milky National

people r anxious about AI because they don't understand knowledge. effective altruist dorks believe some combination of 1) all things that can be thought are deterministic and can be "solved" and 2) humans exist as an animalistic version of reason. and so AI destroys not just the role of humans on earth but the very notion of scarcity even beyond the material world. nothing "new" can exist in a world where everything is implicitly solved simply because it can be conceived, since we now have the means to get from conception to resolution for anything that could exist in nous. it gigafries their idea of everything about existence and this is why tech types are the most anxious, not just because they're the ones losing jobs but they have no other frame for human existence.

on the other end people understand the idea that AI can be trained only on what exists and therefore think AI can never be anything more than the apotheosis of reddit plus maybe a fancy calculator for top mathematicians.

and they are correct that AI is limited because it cannot e.g. create and assert things sui generis but they do not respect the deterministic nature of reason like the math nerds do. and the math nerds on the other hand erroneously think you can reason your way to aristotle and kant and nietzche and the chrystler building from nothing (or equivalently that there is no meaningful difference between good, insightful art and bad art, because they are tasteless dorks). everyone is just projecting their prejudices of their notion of the human onto this technology.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992414)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2026 11:43 PM
Author: umber idiot

No one has actually used it to do anything though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992352)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 12:42 AM
Author: Aphrodisiac senate scourge upon the earth

ai has invented nothing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992421)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 12:29 AM
Author: Self-centered Menage Laser Beams

I upgraded to Claude pro to ask fable some questions and it said this is banned and changed it to opus wtf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992410)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 12:35 AM
Author: Swashbuckling Lake Tanning Salon

I heard it got extended till tomorrow. Either way just use the API.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2/en-en/#49992417)