is it because it's true	Turquoise talented base	07/13/26
The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many differe...	Stirring frozen fat ankles	07/13/26
Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors	Turquoise talented base	07/13/26
Bet	Stirring frozen fat ankles	07/13/26
Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "auth...	opaque odious ticket booth	07/13/26
The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible f...	Stirring frozen fat ankles	07/13/26
Rupert Sheldrake discussed this	Turquoise talented base	07/13/26
The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuf...	Stirring frozen fat ankles	07/13/26
...	Turquoise talented base	07/13/26

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:17 PM Author: Turquoise talented base is it because it's true (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49997960)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:27 PM Author: Stirring frozen fat ankles The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many different groups benefitted from portraying their predecessors as sterile schoolmen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49997987)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:28 PM Author: Turquoise talented base Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49997989)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:33 PM Author: Stirring frozen fat ankles Bet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49997997)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:34 PM Author: opaque odious ticket booth Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "authorities" based on incomplete or corrupt corpora, and then materialism in the natural sciences proved so powerful that the idea that substantial forms have any causal power was almost entirely abandoned. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49998000)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:52 PM Author: Stirring frozen fat ankles The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible forms that ground their identity, unity and directed activities still has not been decisively refuted by science. I think at the very least a naturalized account of form as causally efficacious organization is highly plausible, while the stronger scholastic ontology remains a live but unverified interpretation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49998043)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM Author: Turquoise talented base Rupert Sheldrake discussed this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49998046)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:59 PM Author: Stirring frozen fat ankles The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuff he says regarding biology is obviously crankery, but actually not bad if taken as metaphor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49998061)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM Author: Turquoise talented base (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2/en-en/#49998047)