The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Real Q for lawmos: why don't you just do 100% race/gender based voir dire?
| Gloostick | 09/04/26 |
| VoteRepublican | 09/04/26 |
| alexis mac allister | 09/04/26 |
| Gloostick | 09/04/26 |
| alexis mac allister | 09/04/26 |
| double breasted suit and full windsor at mcdonalds | 09/04/26 |
| Gloostick | 09/04/26 |
| double breasted suit and full windsor at mcdonalds | 09/04/26 |
| coolgod | 09/04/26 |
| country doctor | 09/04/26 |
| the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) | 09/04/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:49 PM Author: Gloostick and don't say "it's not allowed!!" who gives a shit
like this clancy thing should just be both sides trying to kick out as many women or men as possible
white kid murdered by a nigger = try to boot every nigger you can (or vice versa)
some are more objective but seems like a ton of instances just being racist and sexist is a far more effective heuristic than whatever bullshit else you could think of |
 |
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:52 PM Author: VoteRepublican (A true Chad!! where's your gf/wifew?) i dont think is that simple because being conservative/lib is randomly distributed even for x gender y race (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2/en-en#50116788) |
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:52 PM Author: alexis mac allister don't they do this already (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2/en-en#50116787) |
|
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:53 PM Author: Gloostick idk do they? that's why i'm asking
I would think there is a whole art to asking questions that are functionally proxies for "are you a stupid nigger" |
|
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:56 PM Author: alexis mac allister iirc they get a certain number of strikes no questions asked so of course this is what they do I forget the rest am not a practicing lawyer fwiw this was CA many years ago |
|
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:53 PM Author: double breasted suit and full windsor at mcdonalds You're not allowed to do that not flame lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2/en-en#50116792) |
|
Date: September 4th, 2026 10:03 PM Author: Gloostick you aren't asking "is anyone here a stupid nigger" you're asking questions that let you pick the stupid niggers for removal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2/en-en#50116804) |
|
Date: September 4th, 2026 10:17 PM Author: double breasted suit and full windsor at mcdonalds They legit don't let you have fewer than certain amounts of nigs and browns and women on the jury. It's an actual rule. The rationale for dinging them doesn't even matter. Think of it like disparate impact (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2/en-en#50116814) |
|
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:53 PM Author: coolgod can't do it imo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2/en-en#50116793) |
|
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:59 PM Author: country doctor this is the near future.
juries filled with murderously racially resentful 90IQ foreign-born nons presided over by dreadlocked 93IQ judges.
diversity is our strength. |
|
Date: September 4th, 2026 10:06 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) It's like 75% that. You wouldn't think you'd need 25% for other shit but you'd be shocked how many people come in and say that (e.g.) millionaires who are accused of committing tax evasion are all guilty of tons of other shit too and deserve to be hanged in the street.
But you can't realistically get an all-woman jury; I've tried a couple times and didn't even get close (and on the most prominent example I can think of they elected one of the 3 women to be foreman and she totally hung my guy). You also can't get a "young" jury. |