The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
A lot of medieval scholasticism was just taking the LSAT in reverse
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/10/26 |
| racy theater stage generalized bond | 08/10/26 |
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/10/26 |
| racy theater stage generalized bond | 08/10/26 |
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/10/26 |
| Contagious Bat Shit Crazy Feces | 08/10/26 |
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/10/26 |
| Jade immigrant dopamine | 08/10/26 |
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/10/26 |
| Beady-eyed Rough-skinned Factory Reset Button Parlor | 08/10/26 |
| hyperactive big field tank | 08/10/26 |
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/10/26 |
| hyperactive big field tank | 08/10/26 |
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/10/26 |
| hyperactive big field tank | 08/10/26 |
| Beady-eyed Rough-skinned Factory Reset Button Parlor | 08/10/26 |
| Contagious Bat Shit Crazy Feces | 08/10/26 |
| tripping confused brethren parlour | 08/10/26 |
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/10/26 |
| lemon comical love of her life | 08/11/26 |
| dull up-to-no-good rigor theater | 08/11/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:18 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater The LSAT does all the writing for you, you just pick the right answer. In medieval dissertations you had to do all the writing, and you had to use LSAT logic to make your points. Your logic had to be tight at each step. It didn't matter what you were writing about, you had to score a 180. There couldn't be any gaps in your reasoning. Even if you were just writing about a medicinal plant from the Dutch Indies, you had to go out of your way to prove your command of formal logic. They did this in the middle east for a long time too. Persians thought you had to show your command of LSAT logic before you could say anything else. Descartes didn't invent nuthin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059531) |
 |
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM Author: racy theater stage generalized bond dont like this because extreme smarts like me take too big steps that normals cant rly follow so its unfair (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059539) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:33 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater That's fine, we'll just let you publish in the vernacular so that you'll be the smartest author anyone can pick up and read (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059593) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:38 PM Author: racy theater stage generalized bond can u explain descartes meaning here? and why did the rhetoric ppl all study religion if they are suppose to be logical (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059607) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:47 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater Butterfly effect of Constantine's conversion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059623) |
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:19 PM Author: Contagious Bat Shit Crazy Feces 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059535) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater In the classroom and in writing, it often takes the form of explicit disputation: a topic drawn from the tradition is broached in the form of a proposition on a question to be debated, oppositional responses are given, a counterproposal is argued and oppositional arguments rebutted. Because of its emphasis on rigorous dialectical method, scholasticism was eventually applied to many other fields of study.[6][7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM Author: Jade immigrant dopamine The last sentence there definitely follows from the rest! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059541) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:37 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater Philosopher Johann Beukes has suggested that from 1349 to 1464, the era between the deaths of William of Ockham and Nicholas of Cusa, there was a distinct period characterized by "robust and independent philosophers" who departed from high scholasticism on issues such as institutional criticism and materialism but retained scholasticism's method. These philosophers include Marsilius of Padua, Thomas Bradwardine, John Wycliffe, Catherine of Sienna, Jean Gerson, Gabriel Biel and ended with Nicholas of Cusa.[30]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: Beady-eyed Rough-skinned Factory Reset Button Parlor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059694) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:52 PM Author: hyperactive big field tank Are you sure? have you read the wikipedia entry for Scholasticism yet? It's all in there. QED. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059635) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:01 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater Mastery of syllogistic reasoning was your ticket into the club. It was necessary, but no one said it was sufficient to do anything, just like no one thinks a perfect LSAT score qualifies you to practice law. Descartes whined that "but syllogistic reasoning isn't enough," but in order to make that argument Descartes also had to demonstrate his mastery of syllogistic reasoning. And here we are in the 21st century still taking the LSAT.
So what was Descartes really trying to say? What's he got to teach us right now? |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:04 PM Author: hyperactive big field tank what (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059680) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:06 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater Descartes was saying syllogistic reasoning can't get you to true knowledge. But anyone trying to figure out who John the Baptist was could have told you the same thing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059689) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:10 PM Author: hyperactive big field tank Oh ok cool (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059707) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:03 PM Author: Beady-eyed Rough-skinned Factory Reset Button Parlor cr! x, y, z, ... ... ... it was all the persians (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059674) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:03 PM Author: Contagious Bat Shit Crazy Feces (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059675) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:49 PM Author: tripping confused brethren parlour I like how THE LOGIC led St. Augustin to conclude that the saints in heaven enjoy watching the torments of sinners in hell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059631) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 11:38 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the_Mind (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50059959) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 5:57 AM Author: lemon comical love of her life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50060248) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 7:25 PM Author: dull up-to-no-good rigor theater https://i.imgur.com/7OT3nXm.png (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2/en-en#50062017) |