After reflecting on it for a bit I think that I understand girldads now. Imagine the same thing only she is your daughter. She is half you and half of the woman that at least at some point you were in love with. And she actually unconditionally loves you back unlike your wife. You are with her all the way from her birth, helping and caring for her the whole time, guiding her to eventually blossom as an adult woman

Almost all of the men in this position must feel much closer to their daughter than they do to their wife. In my experience this seems true. And there is definitely a sexual undercurrent to the relationship. Like I said, she is half you, half the woman who you loved, and you've developed closer intimacy with her than you have any other woman. All of these women have a sexual bond with their fathers too, even if he is a beta dork, that's just how women are, it's why the "daddy" thing is so prevalent

I don't think men in this situation ever make any "choices" about this dynamic. It's just how it happens and there was never any real agency by either them or their daughter. This never happened before the boomer generation because men never actually spent much time with their kids like they do now. Girls were raised by the mother and kids were already "adults" by very young ages and working and helping adults. Nowadays "dads" are like moms and it's really weird and unhealthy for everyone involved and leads to anti social dynamics like girldadism

I have more sympathy for these guys now but at the same time I am more hardened in my conviction that wifeguyism and girldadism are serious problems and threats to society. Realistically there's nothing that can be done though and society just has to collapse and be reborn into something else. Many such cases re: other problems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49986133)

If I could "do it all over again" I think I'd be a deadbeat dad and have like a dozen kids with different women and live on the margins of society and never touch or interact with a Screen

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49986223)

Girls: Prima; Secunda; Tertia; Quatra

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49992130)

boys are idiots but funnier and chiller

for girls you just want them to grow up pretty likable and not dumb so you can have a chiller relationship

boys have to be hte man so you have to raise them like men

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49986278)

a couple ways to interpret this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49986285)

Im gay btw

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49987003)

there is no coming back from the loss of religion. secularization of the west is a one way street and the effects are catastrophic and ongoing. our societies and way of life and the lens through which we viewed things were constructed around it for literal thousands of years. poof

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49987032)

the jewish mind folks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49986987)

I didn't bother to say this in the op but people for the previous 99.9% of human history would think we were completely insane for living life this way. Like obviously it's not appropriate at all for a father to be dadding around with his daughter all the way up through puberty and into young adulthood. Totally ridiculous and obviously going to lead to weird problems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49987020)

That is not at all what I am accusing "girldads" of. In fact the entire point of the post is that "girldads" are not actually doing anything "wrong" nor are they "at fault." They are a product of broader societal trends that were never under their personal control

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49988357)

A lot of "people" out there very concerned about "the billionaires" but not concerned about capital itself, etc. So many such cases you could never list them all

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49988525)

Girls should be ironing and scouring floors and not even be able to read. not being given Rides and told they are perfect however they are.

if you truly understand girldads know you would admit dads are responsible for this and then later breeder men feed into it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49988171)

Date: July 8th, 2026 11:37 AM

Author: 26k a year and giving you the zoomer stare (Goy Superstar)

She's 10 years old and absolutely adores me and follows me around and gets really excited to show me stuff and play games and activities with me. Very bright and perceptive for her age and able to keep up in conversation basically as well as an adult woman can

After reflecting on it for a bit I think that I understand girldads now. Imagine the same thing only she is your daughter. She is half you and half of the woman that at least at some point you were in love with. And she actually unconditionally loves you back unlike your wife. You are with her all the way from her birth, helping and caring for her the whole time, guiding her to eventually blossom as an adult woman

Almost all of the men in this position must feel much closer to their daughter than they do to their wife. In my experience this seems true. And there is definitely a sexual undercurrent to the relationship. Like I said, she is half you, half the woman who you loved, and you've developed closer intimacy with her than you have any other woman. All of these women have a sexual bond with their fathers too, even if he is a beta dork, that's just how women are, it's why the "daddy" thing is so prevalent

I don't think men in this situation ever make any "choices" about this dynamic. It's just how it happens and there was never any real agency by either them or their daughter. This never happened before the boomer generation because men never actually spent much time with their kids like they do now. Girls were raised by the mother and kids were already "adults" by very young ages and working and helping adults. Nowadays "dads" are like moms and it's really weird and unhealthy for everyone involved and leads to anti social dynamics like girldadism

I have more sympathy for these guys now but at the same time I am more hardened in my conviction that wifeguyism and girldadism are serious problems and threats to society. Realistically there's nothing that can be done though and society just has to collapse and be reborn into something else. Many such cases re: other problems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49988405)

Girls do want to fuck their fathers but that's just because women are satanic entities and that doesn't really have to do with anything we're talking about here that's just the banality of evil female nature

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49988577)

cslg is definitely not a girldad. that guy doesn't care about anyone or anything in the world other than himself

the Problem with girldads is they love Too Much

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49989015)

as i explained above, it's the madonna side of the madonna-whore complex anyway. less about sex qua sex and more about the "reverence" that men have for women that comes from our instinctively positive sentiment toward women as a sex

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49989267)

that's why "sexual undercurrent" reads as "dad wants to fuck little girl" rather than general sexual intensities in any interpersonal relationship involving an adult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49989274)

wifeguyism and girldadism are serious problems and threats to society.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49989498)

The following summary of marriages prohibited by Jewish religious law details specifically whom one may and may not marry.

A Man May Not Marry:

1. Anyone not Jewish.

2. The daughter of an adulterous or incestuous union (mamzeret).

3. A married woman, until the civil and Jewish divorces have been completed.

4. His own divorced wife after her remarriage to another man and the latter’s death or divorce.

5. A widow of a childless husband who is survived by a brother, until after the chalitzah ceremony has been performed.

6. A married woman with whom he committed adultery, but now divorced or widowed.

7. A kohen may not marry a divorced woman, a chalutzah-widow, a convert, a zonah, or a chalalah (see Kohen Marriages).

8. Relatives (primary and secondary incest):

(a) His mother, grandmother and ascendants; the mother of his grandfather; his stepmother, the wife of his paternal grandfather, and of his ascendants; and the wife of his maternal grandfather.

(b) His daughter, granddaughter, great granddaughter and her descendants; his daughter-in-law; the wife of his son’s son, and descendants; and the wife of his daughter’s son.

(c) His wife’s daughter or her granddaughter and descendants.

(e) His sister, half-sister, his full or half-brother’s wife (divorced or widowed) except for Levirate marriage with the widow of a childless brother, and the full or half-sister of his divorced wife in her lifetime.

(f) His aunt, and uncle’s wife (divorced or widowed), whether the uncle be a full or half-brother of his father or mother.

A Man May Marry:

1. His step-sister (a step-parent’s daughter from a previous marriage, even though they were raised together as brother and sister from their earliest youth).

2. His stepfather’s wife (divorced or widowed).

3. The daughter-in-law of his brother or his sister (divorced or widowed).

4. His niece. In American and English civil law, a man may not marry a niece who is the daughter of his brother or sister, but may marry a niece who is the daughter of his wife’s brother or sister. The halakhic permission—even encouragement—to marry the daughter of a brother or sister is superseded by the civil law’s prohibition in this case.

5. His cousin.

6. His stepson’s wife (divorced or widowed).

7. His deceased wife’s sister, but not his divorced wife’s sister (unless she is deceased already).

8. A woman with whom he had relations in their unmarried state.

9. A kohen may marry a widow (who was never divorced).

A Woman May Not Marry:

1. Anyone not of the Jewish faith.

2. The son of an adulterous or incestuous union (mamzer).

3. A married man, until the civil and Jewish divorces have been completed.

4. A man with whom she committed adultery.

5. Her divorced husband, after the death or divorce of her second husband.

6. The following relatives (primary and secondary incest):

(a) Her father, grandfather and ascendants; her stepfather; and the husband of her grandmother and of her ascendants.

(b) Her son, grandson, great grandson; her son-in-law, and the husband of her granddaughter and descendants.

(c) Her husband’s father, or grandfather, and the father of her father-in-law and ascendants; and the father of her mother-in-law.

(d) Her husband’s son or grandson and descendants.

(e) Her brother, half-brother, her full or half-sister’s divorced husband in her sister’s lifetime, and her husband’s brother.

(f) Her nephew.

7. A convert may not marry a kohen.

A Woman May Marry:

1. Her step-brother (a step-parent’s son from a previous marriage, even though they were raised together as brother and sister from their earliest youth).

2. Her step-mother’s former husband (divorced or widowed).

3. The son-in-law of her brother or sister.

4. Her cousin.

5. Her sister’s husband (after her sister’s death, not divorce, unless she is deceased already).

6. Her uncle. In Jewish incest law, an aunt-nephew marriage is prohibited, but an uncle-niece marriage is permitted even though the state prohibits it. A man may marry his deceased wife’s sister, but a woman may not marry her deceased husband’s brother. Even a childless widow, whom the Bible commanded to marry her husband’s brother, must today receive chalitzah, enforced separation.

7. A man with whom she had relations in her unmarried state.

8. A kohen’s daughter does not have the restrictions of a male kohen.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49989554)

but these guys all go "too deep" and instead end up just being beta provider dorks but for their daughter(s) instead of just wife

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49990584)

This happens likewise with the All Consuming Mother who smothers an adult son like that famous story about the NBA star (someone help me out here).

Very awkward wording in OP and I feel obligated to call you a pdf file in passing for the integrity of my poast. There is something very very sick happening in our culture and kikes ITT may be attacking you for exposing their poisoning of the collective unconsciousness.

I find it very interesting, odd case, that jungian scholar consuela could make such a maliciously disingenuous interpretation of the OP. My theory is that GoySS and Consuela have shockingly similar minds dedicated to to piercing the veil, but are abhored by each other's choice of target. Which in this case is a reasonable point; of all the reality denying things wrong in this world--why is OP fixating on such a thought? Anyways, gotta go

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49991058)

now that i understand them, i realize that i've been treating girldads somewhat unfairly. i've also been lumping them and simps into the same category when they're not the same thing at all. simps really are contemptible, evil creatures, whereas girldads are just products of their environment and circumstances

girldads are still really bad news ofc but it's pointless to rage at them or try to shame them; they're not ever going to be able to change. simps, on the other hand, should be brutally persecuted as much as possible

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49991119)

this place sucks now

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880762&forum_id=2:#49992098)