Reading Ishiguro's The Remains of the Day right now. Pretty great so far.
| charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | Bronze crackhouse pisswyrm | 05/16/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | Abusive Racy Dilemma Lettuce | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | Abusive Racy Dilemma Lettuce | 05/12/18 | | Abusive Racy Dilemma Lettuce | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | Abusive Racy Dilemma Lettuce | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | Abusive Racy Dilemma Lettuce | 05/12/18 | | Crystalline razzle-dazzle rehab puppy | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | Abusive Racy Dilemma Lettuce | 05/12/18 | | Bronze crackhouse pisswyrm | 05/16/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/16/18 | | Bronze crackhouse pisswyrm | 05/16/18 | | Soul-stirring twinkling uncleanness | 05/16/18 | | Lavender Quadroon | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | bateful chestnut alpha | 05/12/18 | | bateful chestnut alpha | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | drab selfie | 05/12/18 | | Abusive Racy Dilemma Lettuce | 05/12/18 | | flushed mexican | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | flushed mexican | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/12/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/16/18 | | Bronze crackhouse pisswyrm | 05/16/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/16/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/16/18 | | beady-eyed obsidian associate | 05/16/18 | | Bronze crackhouse pisswyrm | 05/16/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/16/18 | | beady-eyed obsidian associate | 05/16/18 | | Bronze crackhouse pisswyrm | 05/16/18 | | indecent adulterous casino | 05/16/18 | | Bronze crackhouse pisswyrm | 05/16/18 | | charcoal property national security agency | 05/16/18 | | propecia mathematica | 07/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 12th, 2018 1:29 AM Author: charcoal property national security agency
I'm about 100 pages in.
He won the Nobel last year, and I had previously read Never Let Me Go, which was 180, so I figured I'd give his first novel a shot. Obviously Japanese, but he was educated in England and writes in English (adeptly so).
Plot is first-person narration by an English butler in the early 20th century, thus far almost exclusively reminiscing about his past. Almost like Victorian style shit like Pride and Prejudice or Jane Eyre, where not a whole lot "happens," but the character development is very strong and the dialogue is awesome. An extended passage about the "dignity" displayed by the narrator's father, who was also a butler, was outstanding.
I am excited to read the rest this weekend.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974929&forum_id=2:#36035008) |
 |
Date: May 12th, 2018 1:49 AM Author: charcoal property national security agency
another 180 anecdote the narrator recounts: being instructed by his lord to give a guest's soon-to-be-married twentysomething son "the facts of life" talk, because the kid's father is too pussy to do it or something.
Butler approaches kid and is like "I have a message to convey. You are aware, I presume, that there are several important distinctions between ladies and gentlemen?"
then tries to steer the conversation toward nature (geese, fish, etc.)
He never successfully finishes the talk because he always gets interrupted by other matters to attend to.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974929&forum_id=2:#36035099) |
Date: May 12th, 2018 1:57 AM Author: flushed mexican
there was a movie, you know. its pretty good. not amazing or anything, but solid.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974929&forum_id=2:#36035134)
|
Date: May 16th, 2018 1:10 AM Author: charcoal property national security agency
UPDATE: finished it. Truly excellent. Highly recommend. The ending was ABSOLUTELY | DEVASTATING but pitch perfect.
Watched the film adaptation, and although it was more or less fine (Hopkins and Thompson turned in great performances), they took some subtle yet serious liberties, two in particular that I remember, both involving Stevens (the narrator) and Miss Kenton. One is when Stevens is walking past Miss Kenton's room and he hears her weeping (shortly after she had told him she was getting married). In the book, he pauses and listens for a few moments, but then just keeps walking, another example of a time when a less aspie man (or at least a man less type-A dedicated to his job) would've been a friend and comforted her. In the movie, they have him go in and talk to her. Then, even more inexplicably, right at the end: in the book, Miss Kenton basically straight up tells Stevens in their last conversation that she sometimes imagined what life would've been like "with" him, clearly meaning if they had been together. In the movie, they somehow deleted this line entirely and just left the connection strongly implied. Really pissed me off.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974929&forum_id=2:#36059710) |
|
|