\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The N64 DD was Nintendo's attempt to make the n64 more highbrow and sophisticate

but if failed even in Japan iirc and we never got it in the...
slippery glassy degenerate
  04/03/26
Nintendo should have used the Ocarina of Time engine to make...
slippery glassy degenerate
  04/03/26
they never brought pokemon to a home console. and if they di...
nighttime arrogant locus idiot
  04/03/26
Pokemon blue with better sprites would have sold billions on...
slippery glassy degenerate
  04/03/26
Why was Rare allowed to make Mario 64 ripoff (banjo kazooie)...
slippery glassy degenerate
  04/03/26
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/916387-nintendo-64/8111...
nighttime arrogant locus idiot
  04/03/26
An Important topic to discuss, ty
slippery glassy degenerate
  04/03/26
Banjo Kazooie actually contributed to OOT getting delayed be...
nighttime arrogant locus idiot
  04/03/26
Banjo Kazooie is the only worthwhile platformer England ever...
slippery glassy degenerate
  04/06/26
Classy DDs
Concupiscible Parlor Foreskin
  04/03/26
...
vigorous fat ankles temple
  04/06/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 1:20 PM
Author: slippery glassy degenerate

but if failed even in Japan iirc and we never got it in the US. I remember seeing articles about how it would revolutionize gaming and we'd get massive open world zelda. Then we finally got that on switch and it wore out its welcome with a rehashed sequel

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 1:21 PM
Author: slippery glassy degenerate

Nintendo should have used the Ocarina of Time engine to make a Pokemon RPG for n64 it would have sold billions and they would have buried Sony. Simply a fact. Nobody cared about "Majora's Mask".

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 1:27 PM
Author: nighttime arrogant locus idiot

they never brought pokemon to a home console. and if they did, the handheld pokemon would be regarded as second rate just like literally every handheld game. and it's cheap af to make the handheld versions. it's Lucrative af. more Lucrative than fucking Silksong maybe

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 1:37 PM
Author: slippery glassy degenerate

Pokemon blue with better sprites would have sold billions on n64

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 1:23 PM
Author: slippery glassy degenerate

Why was Rare allowed to make Mario 64 ripoff (banjo kazooie) and a mario kart rip off (diddy kong) but they didn't make a Pokemon rip off? Makes you think.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 1:31 PM
Author: nighttime arrogant locus idiot

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/916387-nintendo-64/81119913

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 1:36 PM
Author: slippery glassy degenerate

An Important topic to discuss, ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 1:31 PM
Author: nighttime arrogant locus idiot

Banjo Kazooie actually contributed to OOT getting delayed because of how good it looked iirc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 6th, 2026 1:08 PM
Author: slippery glassy degenerate

Banjo Kazooie is the only worthwhile platformer England ever produced

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 3rd, 2026 2:17 PM
Author: Concupiscible Parlor Foreskin

Classy DDs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2



Reply Favorite

Date: April 6th, 2026 12:58 PM
Author: vigorous fat ankles temple



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5853049&forum_id=2