There is allegedly a video called "frazzledrip." Has any of you personally seen the video?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49860989)

Are you talking about the 2025-2026 file drops? Yes those were Socially Proven from the outset imho.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49861139)

The Podesta/Clinton emails aren't super convincing to me on their own. I looked at them a while ago and didn't think "pizza" was obviously coded language even if a few usages sounded weird. But other stuff makes me think twice, like the Comet Pizza owner having openly pedophilic/child-abuse-related stuff on his insta. And we know beyond a shadow of a doubt from the EF that a lot of the ruling class rapes/abuses children (and uses similar coded language) so it's like... OK maybe this specific group was doing it all along after all.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49861128)

no cap fr fr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49861877)

the evidence was overwhelming. the guy was openly bragging about it on instagram etc. totally ridiculous and clearly thought he was untouchable

i don't consider the emails between podesta, obama, etc to be 100% without a doubt proof of participating in similar behavior, but there's enough evidence for me to believe that it was more likely than not

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49861883)

Btw you left your napkin at my house after last week's pizza and hot dog party.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49861922)

Sorry, just wondering how many stereotypes you check off before we conclude that you do, in fact, conform to a stereotype.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864094)

[redacted]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864100)

The Israeli art student operation, plus the Israeli artists who had unrestricted access to the Twin Towers in the months leading up to September, seal the deal for me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864778)

But if there are people who will immediately identify you from certain statements, and if it bothers you to be identified, don't fucking share those things. If you keep doing it only to be disappointed, the fault is clearly with you

But also keep shit in perspective. People get blasted on here for all types of dumb shit. Being lib. Being con. Being fat (except you, disco fries, it's not dumb in your case). Not having a STEM background. Etc. That kind of shit is inherent to this place (and humanity at large), so who gives a fuck. Show you're not a bird brain by not leaning in group acceptance dynamics. They don't like it? Fuck 'em

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864902)

But yes credited response, ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864923)

Well, there's always Diogenese to prove the necessity of considering the audience moreso than the level of acceptance. And to reassess things based on this being a site built around torment. In fact, I would be willing to bet you keep revealing yourself because you specifically want acceptance from a place that is predisposed not to give it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49865048)

Honestly second paragraph pretty much nailed it. It's a little more complicated than that, like that's not the ONLY reason I end up talking about myself and being identified, but it's gotta be part of it. And "want[ing] acceptance in a place that is predisposed not to give it" sums up my 17-year relationship with this place better than I ever could have.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49865235)

A good rule of thumb is to avoid discarding something when a crazy frenzy whips up around a topic. That frenzy is indicative of intentional subterfuge

Am interested to know: what's your view on 9/11?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49863765)

I am confident that Israel played a large role in 9/11. I would guess that they planned the whole thing, but at the very least, they funded it and knew about it and gave the Zio traitors a heads-up not to come to work. Not sure how much our government knew beforehand, though. I'd guess that the Bush admin didn't know but the CIA/Deep State did. What do you think?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864029)

I meant to ask if you think the government lied about the circumstances and whether you think there was any control to the collapse, or if you think it was some kind of design element that helped both towers collapse so neatly despite the kinetic and heat energy affecting each building in different ways

I honestly haven't given the "who was ultimately responsible" question much thought while it seems undeniable to me that our own government has lied about it from the outset and then used it to justify wars and occupation that have directly precipitated our downfall. I 100% do think Israel knew about and likely had involvement in the events leading up to the buildings coming down, though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864156)

- firefighters reporting hearing explosions all over the towers, and

- the fact that no one has a good explanation for WTC7 going down

So I'm not an MFE but seems like there were bombs planted to me. Again not sure how much of it was CIA vs. Mossad when it comes to the actual setup.

And yeah, regardless of how much the admin knew beforehand, I 100% agree with what you said in the last para.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864197)

Huma is now married to a Soros 🤔

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5863103&forum_id=2]#49864060)