NPR: CBS Cancels Colbert Despite High Ratings
| hideous low-t boiling water senate | 05/18/26 | | bronze bipolar messiness | 05/18/26 | | hideous low-t boiling water senate | 05/18/26 | | bronze bipolar messiness | 05/18/26 | | aphrodisiac pale knife | 05/18/26 | | big mental disorder | 05/18/26 | | bespoke rigpig | 05/18/26 | | Peach Ceo Station | 05/30/26 | | big mental disorder | 05/18/26 | | submissive theater stage | 05/18/26 | | big mental disorder | 05/30/26 | | concupiscible alpha | 05/30/26 | | big mental disorder | 05/30/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:40 AM Author: big mental disorder
it wasn't "highly rated." such a lie. it had a small number of viewers and the median age of those viewers was 68. advertisers don't pay much for shitty audiences.
on top of weak ratings, it had a massively bloated production cost and was losing something like $40 million per year.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867200&forum_id=2]#49888431) |
Date: May 18th, 2026 12:43 PM Author: big mental disorder
NYT: late night shows aren't about revenue and proftis, they're about networks expressing their identities.
"Having a late-night star on the air most weeknights has been a powerful statement, affirming that the broadcasters were still in the game, still offering original programming taped before a live audience that viewers showed up for, year round. Successful hosts became their networks’ signature stars."
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/16/opinion/stephen-colbert-late-show-cbs.html
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867200&forum_id=2]#49888557) |
|
|