Burned out drug addicts whose brains are totally and irreversibly fried have similar coherence burnout

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037173)

LLMs are doing a number 2 u

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037228)

Its some made up shit a throttled GPT session would slap together. 0 results on Google for this. Sry im not a sychophantic LLM accepting whatever made up bs ur slamming into the chat

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037236)

This is like saying the sky is blue, it is utterly self evident. Crazy how dumb you are

Edit: I hope I’m not responding to the incest pedophile goy superstar here , which would be a total and complete waste of time

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037241)

The reading-comprehension failure belongs to the "lay off the drugs" reply.

Here's the chain:

First speaker coins/uses a specific compound term: "coherence burnout" (and "coherence drive").

Speaker says: "Never heard of coherence burnout, sounds like GPT slop" — i.e., they're saying that specific phrase reads like an invented, AI-generated-sounding neologism, not that they don't understand the word "coherence" in isolation.

Responds as if the second speaker claimed ignorance of the word "coherence" itself ("You don't know what 'coherence' means?"). That's a strawman/misreading — nobody said that.

Speaker then explicitly corrects this: they never heard of the term "coherence burnout" (the specific jargon-y phrase), not the word "coherence."

So the wrong assumption is conflating "I haven't heard this specific made-up-sounding compound term before" with "I don't know what a common English word means." Not recognizing a term as established doesn't imply not understanding its constituent words — and the second speaker's jab only makes sense if you elide that distinction, which is exactly the misread the first speaker calls out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037247)

particularly in the low iq free modes that are throttled & degraded it just starts Using Compounds and making up fake concepts

btw u have a 'low coherence drive' and are coherence burnt out, lol consuela you retard trying to non chalantly post this nigger bullshit LOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037502)

The Hebriac one-two combo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037535)

**Coherence burnout** is what happens when the mind’s internal worldbuilding engine stops trying to maintain continuity and simply begins greenlighting whatever produces the strongest five-minute burst of psychic electricity.

One day it is medieval monetary theory. The next day it is raw carnivore mysticism. By Thursday, the subject has become convinced that obscure Soviet animation, mushroom supplements, accelerationist urban planning, and a discontinued Japanese synthesizer are all independently “the key,” despite possessing no shared premises, no stable causal model, and no compatibility whatsoever. The beliefs do not form a worldview. They form a browser history during a gas leak.

A person with high coherence drive experiences contradiction as a problem requiring resolution. A person with coherence burnout experiences contradiction as content diversification. Every enthusiasm arrives with the emotional intensity of revelation and the structural permanence of a push notification. Nothing is integrated. Nothing is discarded. The psyche becomes an abandoned intellectual shopping mall where every storefront is playing a different podcast at maximum volume.

This is not ordinary curiosity. Curiosity expands a model. Coherence burnout replaces the model every six hours and calls the resulting rubble “multidisciplinary.”

That’s not an eclectic worldview, that’s a cognitive landfill with mood lighting.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037550)

I'm sure they're training models away from AI tell because it's even worse than excessive emdashes it a robotic writing trying too hard to be human.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888035&forum_id=2…id#50037563)