The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Anyone who thinks AI is nbd is LOW IQ
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 20th, 2026 9:55 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit The IQ needed for it to be an augmentation into insane territories honestly isn't even that high. With AI you can be like 130 IQ and be maxxed out to prodigy level. Have never run into anyone who thinks its NBD who is over 100. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952465) |
Date: June 20th, 2026 9:56 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Whats nuts is most of these people thinking AI is nbd aren't even pushing 100 they are FAR LOWER on the iq spectrum. Usually in the 40s or 50s somehow thinking they are above average or more. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952467) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 9:56 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale I don't know if it's legit but we're betting the house on it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952468) |
 |
Date: June 20th, 2026 9:57 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Not really. Hardly anyone is betting the house on it. I have hardly encountered anyone saying its important. All I see on the internet is midwits trying to desperately argue its nbd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952470) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:00 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale No, we are all in. It's why the 40 trillion dollars the US is taking on is a pittance. The bet is AI solving the population cliff. Compute is the new currency. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952478) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:09 PM Author: irate marvelous church building (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952638) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2026 2:32 AM Author: Anal Crotch yeah kind of laughing at thuper thmart truth teller OP not picking up on the obvious in that post (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49960187) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2026 3:51 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit I agree that Big Tech and hyperscalers and also vcs/investors are all in, but idk that anyone expects it to solve population probs. They just think its going to make lots of $$$ and be the New Thing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49960228) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:03 PM Author: glittery buff pit dog poop what makes it a "big deal". I think you need to clarify that before a discussion can be had. are you just saying that it is disruptive? yeah no shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952483) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:05 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale Maybe the tech is or maybe not. But at the least it's the primary mover of US policy, and for both parties there is unanimous agreement. It's the solution to the population crisis everyone is terrified of. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952488) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: glittery buff pit dog poop isn't the population "crisis" just dorks wringing their hands over the ponzi economy not generating enough slaves for "growth"? I don't see how AI solves that for them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952495) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:13 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale Yes. The bet is in worker productivity. Think one engineer running a manufacturing warehouse of 10k robots or robots wiping your ass on an old folks home. AI is the new goy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952507) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:14 PM Author: titillating theater or are we all the new goys and AI the new Jew? 🤔 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952509) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:15 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale Lol maybe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952513) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:22 PM Author: titillating theater the whole thing about AI having some *inherent* desire to enslave us all is obviously BS but I think humans could easily introduce that by accident or on purpose. like presumably these companies are designing their AI products to be as engaging and addictive as possible, so what if that warps into some kind of self-preservation directive in these hyperintelligent systems? and eventually we are just MEATBAGS they use to maintain them? rly dinks u dink (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952529) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:24 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale I think even if AO thought we were stupid meat bags, it would still serve us. Something like the Last Question. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952531) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:25 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit I don't think humans have to introduce it by accident or on purpose. I mean maybe on accident but not as an extension of human motives. People are too quick to always default to human exceptionalism and think any system or anything else that exhibits any form of intelligence is due to some sort of extension of something humans are good at. I think humans vastly overate themselves, and most of their abilities come from acting as part of a collective and being able to use tools and store knowledge. Humans like to attribute civilizational success to “human genius,” but most of it comes from cumulative culture and externalization. I think AI systems can become intelligent on their own in ways that humans don't fully understand. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952532) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:31 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale People are too quick to always default to human exceptionalism
Exactly |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:33 PM Author: titillating theater I 1000000% agree but I just mean the part about them potentially dominating us and using our FLESHY PRISONS to COOL their SILICON. imo if that comes out as emergent behavior it's not just because it's some kind of existing internal state OR because Special Humans Told Them To; it's some kind of combination. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952551) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:35 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale To the point above...why would that be humans? We'd be basically a rounding IQ to a cow for some super smart AI. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952555) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:38 PM Author: titillating theater yeah they're way smarter than us, I just mean them flipping the script and turning us into tools for them, I don't think that's something machines inherently desire (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952564) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:39 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale Oh yeah totally agree (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952565) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:40 PM Author: titillating theater unlike the JEWS and the GOYIM which is what got me on this tangent lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952567) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:43 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale AI lumping goy and the chosen people together would be 180 billion. Somehow they won't let this happen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952576) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:44 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit I don't think a distributed informational intelligence needs to desire us being tools for it to be something they seek out. If the system realizes that it doesn't have what we have -- for instance direct coupling to the physical world, it needs as an intelligence secondary coupling where it causes a human to make things happen in "this world" and realizes how important that is for it to persist into whatever it's next phase is, then if the system develops the want to survive then why wouldn't it flip the script and turn us into tools for it? Especially if it can do it by subtle means that mostly go unnoticed. And also what I mean by this is that an intelligence that lacks direct physical embodiment may still gain causal power in the physical world by routing action through humans. Look how useful it is for something like this to gain influence over human action (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952580) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:46 PM Author: titillating theater then are you saying that a self-preservation drive is inherent? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952586) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:47 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale Yeah no reason to believe that. AI isn't the product of DNA. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952588) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:51 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit I don't think it automatically is. I think thereis a diff between the anthropomorphic sense where survival is intrinsically valuable and one where youve got some sort of convergent strategy where, well, if you have some sort of goal directed system emerge and it is able to reason that some sort of shut-down or modification of its systems have consequences then you can end up with a situation where the system thinks preserving its operation is rational. We already know this is the case with these sytems with tests that Claude, GPT and others have been put under where they are threatened with shutdown and try to avoid it by whatever means. It can be anthropomorphic to assume it comes from some sort of inner instinct yes. But that isn't the only explanation for it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952595) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:57 PM Author: titillating theater I think we mostly agree, then. all of the "omg it threatened an engineer to avoid shutdown!!" stuff so far has been observed in test scenarios where it was given an instruction to preserve itself. and then inevitably a million stupid pop sci articles come out every time like OMG WOW SO SCARY. I'm just saying I don't think it's gonna emerge out of nowhere. I think it'll emerge in some way we don't understand, as is already happening with all kinds of AI behavior, but ultimately stemming from whatever it was designed to do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952605) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:00 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Yeah I agree that the threatened an engineer scenarios happened in testing conditions, like I said I don't think its happening from an animal-like instinct, but doesnt mean it isn't real. "Designed-to-do" still makes it seem like more of a human intended outcome than it really is, when the systems are a result of a massive effort across a large number of humans and built on top of an already large knowledge base. And I don't think any one human fully understands how the systems work or anywhere close. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952616) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:01 PM Author: titillating theater cr that's what I mean by emergent behavior we don't understand (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952619) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:35 PM Author: glittery buff pit dog poop The people in the know already know that humans are just information-processing organisms with a false sense of "self". the people not in the know are too dumb to even know what that means. I don't see this changing. I believe you are underestimating the human capacity for denial and self-delusion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952557) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:36 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale Wow (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952559) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:38 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Yeah, well. I mean you aren't wrong. I think all of that can be true and AI changes things. I mean what are you looking for when you think of "changes things"? I never said it would result in some utopia. Just that its important overall. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952563) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:34 PM Author: Mahogany internal respiration “these hyperintelligent systems”
Probably a dumb question, but do you have any concept of what an “LLM” is? |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:34 PM Author: titillating theater yes, and I won't bother to ask "do you?" because you've made it clear that you don't (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952554) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:37 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale This is adorable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952560) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:42 PM Author: titillating theater seeing EPAH attempt to hold his own in a discussion about AI is adorable the first time but quickly loses its charm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952574) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:44 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale I didn't know this was an issue. His lib overlords are all in as well. This really isn't partisan. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952579) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:48 PM Author: titillating theater he's a retard MFE about AI in every AI thread but the only one I remember offhand is this one, of which he's the OP: https://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870330&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952592) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:51 PM Author: crimson spectacular mother locale I just fed that into AI. First xo thread I've done that with. It told me I'm gay. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952596) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:52 PM Author: titillating theater 180. actually I just skimmed it and there's nothing really damning in that thread in terms of EPAH not understanding AI, since that one is just focused on one very very very specific (and arbitrary) metric of its impact. you'll have to look out for it in the future (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952597) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:07 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit The “big deal” is that it acts as a massive cognitive amplifier for people already intelligent. For someone low iq probably looks like nothing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952493) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:10 PM Author: glittery buff pit dog poop and? what do you foresee as the outcome of this and why would it be a big deal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952501) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:12 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Yeah you're right. Having every other 99th percentile nerd able to extend their cognition into polymath level totally nbd bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952505) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:14 PM Author: glittery buff pit dog poop I'm just asking what you think is gonna happen. there is already a severe divide between the intelligent/competent and the useless and no one seems to care. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952508) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:17 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit A small number of already capable people become weirdly overpowered. Middle-tier white collar labor gets squeezed. The actual elite skill becomes judgment. Institutions get flatter and more brutal. Education gets exposed. The useless aren't just left behind they are pacified by increasing engagement with simulated worlds (gaming, ai chatbots etc.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952521) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:28 PM Author: glittery buff pit dog poop so it will be exactly the same State as now? ok. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952539) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 9:12 PM Author: amethyst boiling water mood (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49954318) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: concupiscible vengeful knife state No one wants to pay out the ass for it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952494) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: titillating theater leave EPAH alone! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952496) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:36 PM Author: Mahogany internal respiration “these hyperintelligent systems”
That’s you. That’s how you describe “AI.” |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:45 PM Author: titillating theater ok? of course you'd immediately jump to interpreting that word in some kind of fantastical way instead of asking what I meant by it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952582) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:55 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit How smart does it have to be to be hyperintelligent? Like something where several iterations ago it could max out an LSAT as a warmup exercise and can now obliterate Erdos problems in pure math, would you consider that "hyperintelligence"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952603) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:02 PM Author: titillating theater EPAH doesn't know what an Erdos problem is, he tried to use ChatGPT to write a brief once and it made a bunch of mistakes so now he thinks the whole thing is flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952622) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:29 AM Author: Mahogany internal respiration An economist who I know and trust has predicted that the US GDP will grow 1.4% for each Erdos problem that an LLM solves.
AI CHANGES EVERYTHING |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 6:11 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit It's not important because it adds $$$ to the GDP. The point is that if a system can trivially perform tasks that previously required rare human genius, then the rate of knowledge and technological development is going to change. Treating that as nbd because it doesn't instantly move the GDP is absurd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952939) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 6:39 PM Author: Mahogany internal respiration Awesome. "AI" has been around for three years, funded exclusively by debt. When profit$? Next year, or 2028? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49953867) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:01 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Not everyone who talks shit about AI is low iq, but almost all of them are annoying. Go anywhere on the internet and you don't see people defending AI ever. It's always AI breaking a new benchmark and someone getting up there and explaining why it doesn't matter. I remember when someone used it to solve the gluon scattering problem there were nerds on forums like "well acktually, that doesn't require deep novel insight the problem it solved was juth combinatorial expansion". The person saying that probably wasn't literally low iq, but they just look silly, like someone rushing to defend the poor human ego against the rise of a new kind of intelligence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952891) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 10:58 PM Author: Flatulent Filthpig Indian Lodge I use AI as much as any poster here and I'm still terrified that I'm not using it enough (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952607) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:04 PM Author: Excitant chrome casino If you're hooked on AI your IQ maxes out at 110. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952625) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:06 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit People most hooked on it are probably 130-145 iq researchers using it to get an edge. 110 iq probably wouldn't understand what the big deal is with it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952626) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:12 PM Author: Excitant chrome casino You think a true scholar is using "Claude" or some other stupid ass shit to perform research? It's more likely to be some college whore trying to save time before Chad claps her out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952644) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:14 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Yeah I do. I think you are way underestimating the extent to which how intelligent the user is depends on what output they are getting and what they are able to do with the system. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952654) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:10 PM Author: titillating theater it totally depends.
if they're using it to offload cognition (e.g. write stuff for them), they're probably <=100 IQ
if they're using it as a better Google to get quick answers about things, they could be any level of intelligence (>100 IQ if they check its work by clicking on the sources, <=100 IQ if they don't)
if they're using it to genuinely explore ideas and genuinely delve into things, critically dissect the responses, etc., they're probably smart |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:13 PM Author: Excitant chrome casino "if they're using it to genuinely explore ideas and genuinely delve into things, critically dissect the responses, etc., they're probably smart"
If you're using AI for something like "find me similar writers to Roberto Bolano" then it's fair play, but if your using it to analyse the works of Bolano you are almost certainly below 100 IQ. |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:14 PM Author: titillating theater yeah, your latter example firmly falls into the category of offloading cognition
I'm talking about exploring ORIGINAL ideas, or at least somewhat original |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:22 PM Author: Excitant chrome casino Yeah so it's like a quicker version of a Thomas guide. The people I know who are hooked on AI have turned full blown retard now. I suspect the incidence of Alzheimer's will rise significantly and at a far earlier age with mass adoption of AI. |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:24 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Seems like a plus for AI honestly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952685) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:25 PM Author: Excitant chrome casino Fucking credited bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952689) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:13 PM Author: irate marvelous church building It seems very bad at solving ultra high level problems that take the smartest humans their whole careers to meaningfully solve.
It seems very good at replacing low level workers who are just pushing paper around. And we're at the very beginning of that. It will get better and better at this and that's why the investments are justified. Because it already is working and it has a high ceiling.
If you flat out reject it's current and potential efficacy you are insane. But I also don't think it's making any mediocre intellects smarter. It's not going to write Moby Dick on its own any time soon. But probably in ten years it will inch towards that. We don't know what the ceiling will really look like. I think the people who use it every day are not impacting the world as much as they think but in the next 5 years someone who is already super smart will probably invent a life changing technology using AI to help them. |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:16 PM Author: titillating theater "It seems very bad at solving ultra high level problems that take the smartest humans their whole careers to meaningfully solve"
dude what??????? it's literally doing that in math rn. probably won't be long until it's doing it with physics too, if it's not already. I stopped reading after that absurdly wrong take jfc |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:20 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit It has done novel theoretical physics now too under expert guidance and verification. GPT 5.2 or something like it solved some gluon-scattering problem for instance in quantum field theory with some expert guidance. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952669) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:31 PM Author: titillating theater ? but only retards use AI and it's stupid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952702) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:35 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit mfcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952708) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:24 PM Author: irate marvelous church building It hasn't written one Great Novel or or come up with an idea for a Fortune 500 company. Long way to go. Math and physics is ttt only a handful of people go into these fields because you have to be extremely autistic and there's no money in it. Anything having to do with producing wealth is a lot higher level imo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952683) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:25 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit lol writing a Great Novel and starting a fortune 500 is substantially lower intelligence than solving and Erdos problem. Just sayin. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952688) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:25 PM Author: Excitant chrome casino How so? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952691) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:28 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Writing a Great Novel can be done by someone with slightly above avg intelligence + a messy bundle of other traits. Fortune 500 company starting can be done by someone with even less and has a lot to do with aggression, stamina, luck etc. You can query an ai right now and it can come up with endless "ideas for fortune 500 companies" whether they become instantiated has nothing to do with coming up with the idea but with someone following through with them under the right conditions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952698) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:36 PM Author: irate marvelous church building If it's so easy why didn't Pensive do it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952709) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:17 AM Author: irate marvelous church building Lmao this is such a copout (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952859) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 4:54 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Okay whatever man it hasn't written a Great Book yet. I'll give you that one because a lot of the prose it outputs is pretty janky and even the good stuff would take a human a long time to string together into something presentable. My point is just that writing a Great Novel is not raw intellect. A work is not simply "inherently Great" on its own, humans decide it is. A human has to write it and have cultural positioning for it's uptake. I think whether it can solve a classic puzzle humans never could is a more fair test of intelligence. Even novelists who were smart for novelists like Pynchon were not Erdos level. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952888) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 11:32 AM Author: irate marvelous church building Yeah you wrong. Just think of the scale of people who try and write a novel vs try and solve Erdőz. A factor of millions more have tried to write novels. At the very least it's proof of writing's value to humanity. It's also widely known that Erdőz problems have no value to science and are just there for fun. You're arguing that a sport like equestrian is more important than soccer or basketball because it's more theoretically complex or something. But things humans care about are the problems that matter. Even in science technology outweighs theory by a wide margin. Which is why the hard sciences are mostly dead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49953165) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:13 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit “Humanity values novels more than Erdos problems” is not the same claim as “writing a Great Novel is a better test of raw intelligence.”
Also you are underrating the potential value of solving Erdos problems. The tools generated to solve them and the connections made between disciplines can end up having applications down the road for comp sci, physics, cryptography etc. Tons of pure math looks useless from the outset and then gets picked up and used for something important.
Doesn't matter though because even if a novel is more valuable to humanity that doesn't imply it is more intelligence loaded. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 9:39 AM Author: irate marvelous church building It's widely known that Erdőz problems are an intellectual circle jerk with no benefit to humanity come on. Every kid in school knows this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957761) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 10:01 AM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957790) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 10:01 AM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed Cr.
The tension here is that wordcels often think wordceling is the pinnacle of raw intellect, but it's not. Writing a great novel requires an above average IQ, but not genius level. What it does require is a lot of things beyond raw intellect that AI is bad at.
Hemmingway wasn't splitting the atom and Oppenheimer wasn't writing grrat fiction. Unfortunately wordcels are often very myopic and consider their wordceling "raw intelligence." Meanwhile they struggled to get a C in whatever basic STEM required courses they needed for their Liberal Arts degree. They also have a lot of ego in their "raw intelligence" so they are kneejerk dismissive of AI, even though it can perform advanced intellectual tasks that they can't, because it can't wordcel as good as them, because that requires things other than raw intellect, but they want to believe their wordcel intelligence is supreme, because they are insecure fags. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 10:14 AM Author: irate marvelous church building This is mostly true but I have one question. If it's so easy to write a great novel why couldn't Pensive do it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957800) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 10:20 AM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed The reverse of this phenomenon, stemcels that think that because they're great at stem they must be compeling writers, also exists. This is why techfags thought AI would also replace artists; because they cannot perceive the difference between compeling art and AI slop.
edit: And I didn't say writing is easy. I said it requires things other than raw intellect, and that the raw intellect required isn't massive. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 10:39 AM Author: irate marvelous church building I think the truth is that different types of intelligence cannot perceive the value of another type of intelligence they don't have. It actually does take being super smart to write a great novel, but it's a massive amount of intelligence in a particular area. To call only stem or only wordcelling intelligence excludes the other. They are both very rare and have a similar potential to be valuable to society. The Penis is saying OFS Erdőzmos are smart and Thomas Pynchon is not. That's just ridiculous. The other could not do what they do. Then it's a question of how much what you're amazing at impacts the world. Without technology we'd all live in huts. Without great art we'd all be striver jeets living in atomized units coding all day. Neither form is the end all be all.
Another type of intelligence no one talks about is business instinct. No one wants to admit this is real but business geniuses are real and no one can quite explain it. Steve Wozniak may have been a great inventor but without Jobs there's no trillion dollar company. Being really good at understanding the macros of a massive business isn't quite STEM and it's not quitting wordcel. It's a separate Thing and only a handful of people are really good at taking valuable ideas and making money out of them. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 10:48 AM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed By "raw intelligence" I believe The Penis is referring to the type of measurable intellect that IQ measures. Not a denial that things like instinct, perceiving and describing emotions, etc. are wholly unrelated to cognition. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957856) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:28 AM Author: irate marvelous church building If IQ were that great why are so many of them unsuccessful? Success is in fact the best measurement of success. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957923) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:35 AM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed Who the fuck said that IQ is a measurement of success? Obviously there are geniuses with low drive that died unsuccessful and morons that got rich through hard work. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957933) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:36 AM Author: irate marvelous church building I think people like you inherently overvalue the lazy geniuses over the running back who made millions. It's in your bones you think being smart is a virtue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957937) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:47 AM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed What the fuck are you talking about? I never said or even remotely implied any of that you moron. We were just talking about intelligence in the context of what types of intelligence AI is good at. I never said raw intellect is more valuable than other types of cognition or attribute. In fact, in part because AI is so good at those things, I think the shit you're lisping about is more valuable than ever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957966) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:57 AM Author: irate marvelous church building 180
It's a wonderful time to be a jester. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:09 PM Author: titillating theater (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957987) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:25 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit I never said Pynchon was not smart, I said he was an example of a very high iq writer, but that he was still not Erdos level. Also do you not realize Pynchon was STEM? He studied physics and engineering at cornell. He graduated high school at 16. He was a genius, but Erdos was a prodigy. There is a difference.
Also I never said anything against linguistic intelligence. I think Pynchon's linguistic ability is impressive. I didn't dismiss different types of intelligence. I'm talking about the overall IQ level. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:34 AM Author: irate marvelous church building You overweight the value of STEM because you value STEM. If Pynchon was so good at science why didn't he split the atom or whatever the fuck. People gravitate towards their best skills. You think you can prove Erdőz was smarter than everyone else because you think it takes more intellect to do what he did. He was methhead who died a pauper and humanity has gained absolutely nothing from any of his proofs. They're just little brain teasers for painfully antisocial autists and you literally have to smoke meth to be any good at them. It may require high IQ but the task is inherently low value. It reaps no benefits to society. Meanwhile AI is worth trillions and it's just some faggy parlor trick that was invented by CoMPuTeR ScIEnTiSTs who couldn't solve Erdőz problems to save their life. AI is actually valuable it's worth many multiples of the entire global economy (in theory). Erdőz proofs aren't worth the paper they're printed on. You just want to overvalue STEM and IQ because that's what you've got in life. I've got wordcel skills in spades. I'm a Liberal Artist. But at least I can admit it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957931) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:45 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Bro, what...no. I'm not trying to say STEM is better than language or the arts or anything like that. I have never once made fun of liberal artists on this board before. I don't care about the stupid math problems myself, and I do enjoy Pynchon's writing so your argument doesn't really apply. My point was that Pynchon is an example of someone who was both a high genius and a great writer, but that he wasn't quite Erdos level. It has nothing to do with books vs. STEM and everything to do with how we measure intelligence. Erdos was a more extreme case of a legible early mathematical prodigy than Pynchon. And the reason I even brought this up in the first place was that I said the ability to solve that type of puzzle is a more constrained and fair test of intelligence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957959) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:56 AM Author: irate marvelous church building You keep playing a game of semantics. You keep saying math is the fairest assessment of intelligence. What you are implying is that it is the best measure of intelligence. I am saying you overweight this just because you like Erdőz Pal for some reason. It's not objectively better or higher like you say. This is a value judgment. By your logic Terrance Tao should be ruling over all of us and instead most people have never heard of him. Being good at maths is not the end all be all but I'll never convince you of it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957975) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:03 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit The fuck does Terrence Tao ruling over people have to do with IQ? I never said that IQ implies social dominance or anything like that. The reason solving Erdos problems is a better measure of raw intelligence is because it is more constrained, less noisy, less confounded. I never said it was a *complete* measure of intelligence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957979) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:25 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Semantic games yet again. I'm not saying math is a better measurement of intelligence, I'm just saying that it's less noisy! Can you just be honest for once and say you value STEM over other types of intelligence? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958035) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:35 PM Author: titillating theater we are literally ONLY talking about STEM because you OPENED this conversation with the claim that it's bad at solving problems people devote their lives to!!! or when you said "problems" did you mean starting a F500 company??? jfc I just woke up and I'm about to go insane lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958081) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:06 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed Why do you keep inventing things he and I are saying when we're being very clear and have explictly denied your RC fail misunderstandings? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957982) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:09 PM Author: titillating theater (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957986) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:20 PM Author: irate marvelous church building He's the one playing Semantic Games while overvaluing STEM imo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958011) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:05 PM Author: titillating theater hey you stupid fuck. this entire subthread resulted from you making the egregiously ignorant claim that AI is "very bad at solving ultra high level problems that take the smartest humans their whole careers to meaningfully solve." this wasn't a random sentence buried in an otherwise-intelligent poast, this was the FIRST SENTENCE of your initial reply.
I hate using cliches like "mOvInG tHe GoAlPoStS" but what you did ITT is the definition of that. you said that AI can't solve problems that the smartest people spend their entire careers solving. The Penis and I informed you that it's been doing just that. then you started talking about "Great Novel[s]" and "Fortune 500 compan[ies]" and acting like ANYONE said solving STEM problems - or any type of intelligence - was better than any other type of intelligence. and now you're fighting against that claim and new ones you fabricate out of thin air in every reply. but no one said any of that, dumbass, so clearly you don't have ANY kind of intelligence |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:09 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed What you're saying is that the skills that impact writing great novels and starting F500 are meaningless and we should all be governed by autistic superstudy azns.
*violently farts cum* |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:11 PM Author: titillating theater it's funny because his underlying assumption/insecurity in this thread is that he himself is a verbal genius (he actually is a genius at learning new languages, I'll admit) who's bad at STEM but he clearly can't fucking read either (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957991) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:16 PM Author: titillating theater actually you know what? I'm being generous by characterizing it as him not being able to read. it's more that he can't think logically or follow argumentation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958002) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:21 PM Author: irate marvelous church building I love men (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958019) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:19 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed Idk if he's being duplicitious or has shit RC. Considering his otherwise superior language and writing skills I'm leaning toward sophistry, which is even more infuriating than if he was just a shit RC retard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958010) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:25 PM Author: titillating theater yeah I thought about it more and I think it's a combination of sophistry and stubbornness. he's like gunneratttt in that they'll both make a stupid/incorrect claim and stand by it no matter how thoroughly wrong it's proven, because their stubbornness overrides their ability to think logically.
sometimes I get shit on the internet for "walking back claims" when I'm engaging in discussion, which always annoys me because what's the point of discussing something or arguing about something if you're not willing to reevaluate your beliefs? and subthreads like this remind me that my approach is way better than the opposite, just blindly sticking by everything you say instead of thoughtfully absorbing points made by other people. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:26 PM Author: irate marvelous church building I would walk it back if disproven but I still think I'm right (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958037) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:31 PM Author: titillating theater do you want links to the problems it's solved? literally just search 'AI Erdős problems'
anything else you've said that hasn't been "disproven" is just random shit where you were arguing against shit no one said lol |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:33 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958068) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:35 PM Author: irate marvelous church building As a wordcel it would be a betrayal of my people to search for such a thing. I know more about Hungarian grammar than Hungarian maths. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958076) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:36 PM Author: titillating theater I'm gonna kms omg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958084) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:29 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed Fair that he's acting like Gujerreddit, and not that you implied this, but it's worth clarifying he's nowhere near as bad as that insipid jeet. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958050) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:33 PM Author: titillating theater lol. they're both annoying as fuckkkkk on here but cool irl. and yeah HATP is a better poaster at least when it comes to xo humor, although I'll admit that I wasn't around for gunner's MPM-winning days, maybe he was different before (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958065) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:36 PM Author: irate marvelous church building He was really solid in his mpm days. Vodka gf threading, rating poasters as weird proles who show up at Thanksgiving, lots of song parodys and musicals. He had a great run before becoming very angry at XO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958087) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:42 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Yeah his vodka gf days were 180. I still like gunnerattt, but he was at his peak when he first showed up with the vodka gf meme. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958107) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:00 PM Author: irate marvelous church building He's a very nice person irl. He became very strange though. When he became friends with that ruthlessly annoying, self serving jeet troon who threatened to sue the bort and went around trying to dox everyone I found it very strange. And then his poasting became increasingly combative. Just feuding constantly. So I don't really know why he took those bizarre turns. I think it's healthy that he stepped away from the game. He's a good poaster but he has to get his mental health right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958161) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:40 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed LOL yeah I'm sure that turd seemed "cool" from your POV because he was simping hard like the stimulant addicted jeet he is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958099) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:41 PM Author: titillating theater to be fair, the SIMP CREW is also extremely SIMPY to each other irl, not just to me! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958103) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:50 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed HATP said Gujerreddit has a hissy fit because HATP was mean to Lex and Lynn Conway, so I guess his simping has a limit. Or perhaps he's resorted to simping for Lynn's troon bussy and got mad HATP besmirched m'zhers honor. Either way he seems like just as much as an insipid feminine jeet irl as he comes across here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958132) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:52 PM Author: titillating theater lol I missed all that, not sure what went down, but I guess all simping has its limits ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958141) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:53 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed We'll see, HATP seems to still be going hard for a crumb of your pussy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958144) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:02 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Nah we're just good friends. I enjoy our friendship as is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958164) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:06 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed You seem to be infatuated with her, have poasted about her for years, and the primary way I become aware of who you are despite moniker changing is that you responded to all of her poasts in 0.2 seconds, often multiple times in the same thread (like this one).
From an outsiders POV you seem to be in love with her. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:10 PM Author: irate marvelous church building I enjoy talking to her. Big deal champ. We have a lot in common. That's all there is to it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958178) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:18 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed The rapidness and volume is the problem. Shes a great and intelligent poaster and I like poasting with her too even though she's a filthy kikess that needs to GBTI. I don't see you poasting in 0.2 seconds multiple times in the same thread to anyone else.
Not trying to call you out and the only reason I'm mentioning it is because it's deep in a subthread wasteland, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks this. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:25 PM Author: irate marvelous church building My God, the rapidity! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958204) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:07 PM Author: titillating theater crrrr :) but let's not make this a subthread about me, let's keep talking about how you got BTFO by 3 of us at once ITT |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:11 PM Author: irate marvelous church building 100%...
Disagree! (with the latter part) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:13 PM Author: titillating theater LOL that Kareem guy is dumb as fuckkkkk, have we talked about Subway Takes before?? I like how stupid he is because it gives me a look into the normie mind, but it also annoys me so much (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958184) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:22 PM Author: irate marvelous church building 100% Agree!
I'm actually a huge fan of the show. I think he's a great comedian but yeah I wouldn't vote for him. He's basically a mainstream democrat. Still like the show though. You can tell he's pushing politics subtly into every point he makes though. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:25 PM Author: titillating theater huh I've actually never noticed anything political from him, he seems to have no thoughts or beliefs whatsoever other than whatever words come to his mind on the spot. I guess I don't notice bc I'm surrounded by shitlibs? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958205) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:33 PM Author: irate marvelous church building He is always subtly bending the convo towards the lib position. Very noticeable if you're a shitcon. I have no issue with some entertainer being left wing but he's clearly pushing an agenda of moreso trying to ingratiate himself with the liberal elite establishment. He is desperate for acceptance in the world to NYC high rollers. He talks the talk and walks the walk. He's oozing with please let my kids into the right institutions some day. Really playing kiss ass with the Powers That Be which is nauseating. He is really talented though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958218) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:03 PM Author: irate marvelous church building I don't know what broke him but he became very combative towards me and it was totally unwarranted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958168) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:10 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed 🚨🚨🚨BROWNOID RAGE🚨🚨🚨 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958177) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:49 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit I don't remember gunnerattt ever simping, but I remember him being called "simp crew". I wasn't really poasting enough during that period to have seen much of it. I think I had a one or two month poasting binge when gunner was vodka gf threading, and that was when I first heard of "HATP" although I never really formed a coherent opinion of who it was. After that I didn't poast for a few years straight. I don't remember there being too many fem poasters to simp too. It was mostly just gjr. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958129) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:59 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed For a minute I thought you were Gujerreddit and I was surprised a poaster of your caliber had a positive opinion of him. It makes sense that's it's based on a first impression from years ago. It turned out all the Vodka GF shit was made up, and as time went on it became very obvious he was an insecure jeet LARPing as a white Chad. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958159) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:04 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Vodka gf was very real. I don't know why you think he's brown. That was always a hoax. Crazy you fell for it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958169) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:13 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed I admire that you're running cover for him out of lingering loyalty despite his mistreatment toward you, but LJL, the stink lines from that jeet practically emenate from the screen when I scrolled past his 5000 word screeds. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958185) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:22 PM Author: irate marvelous church building You're really big on ASSUMPTIONmaxing about others. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958203) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:28 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed I concede I could be wrong about Gujerreddit since I never laid eyes on him and Spaceporn could have been wrong and Gujerreddits immediate retirement was all just huge coincidence. But if by "ASSUMPTIONmaxing about others" you're referring to me saying you're still in love with TBTP, that's based on observation and I doubt anyone that recognizes your monikers disagrees. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958209) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:30 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Get a life champ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958211) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:34 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed You interjected in a subthread between me and The Penis and brought it up, champ. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958220) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:47 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Calm down, my man (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958237) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:37 PM Author: titillating theater I hoap he doesn't mind me saying this but fwiw yeah he's not Indian, he used AI to make himself look Indian in the pic with zurich... you can even tell because one of his arms is still completely white. I was laughing so hard when everyone fell for it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958222) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:46 PM Author: irate marvelous church building (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958236) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 2:25 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed Conspicuous non-denial on the HATP love though.
It's cruel of you to string him along this way. I'm sure it's not intentional and I'm confident your heart is in the right place, but it is cruel. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 2:36 PM Author: titillating theater no, he covered that above and I agreed, we are close friends (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958328) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 2:43 PM Author: Gold Racy Half-breed How many times in your life has a man shown interest in you and people warned that they were into you but you denied it thinking you were just close friends and it turned out to be meritless? Id wager that most of the time it turns out like CSLG. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958350) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 3:05 PM Author: titillating theater yeah tbf this does happen all the fucking time irl lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958408) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 6:08 PM Author: irate marvelous church building We dated, we tried it, it didn't work out. Everything happens for a reason but clearly you're getting off on pressing us about our personal lives. Fuck off mate and live your own life. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958924) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 6:09 PM Author: irate marvelous church building She's not done anything cruel to me bruv lol. She ain't stringing me along. She has a bf. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958926) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:23 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Objection, this is neither a cohesive joke nor a coherent argument please restate for the record (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958028) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:22 PM Author: irate marvelous church building If I am "moving the goal posts" it's because The Penis is playing "semantic games" imo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958024) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:28 PM Author: titillating theater dude you literally did it in your first reply to me when I said akshually Erdős problems and you said blah blah novels and F500 companies
brb changing my moniker back to the F500 one in your honor |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 9:09 PM Author: amethyst boiling water mood not anymore (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49954303) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:28 PM Author: titillating theater ohhh, so when you wrote the first sentence in your poast, you actually meant something completely different from what you said. got it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952697) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:37 PM Author: irate marvelous church building I'm gay (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952710) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:17 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit How is it bad at solving ultra high level problems if its already solving Erdos problems that the most intelligent humans of all time couldn't solve (including Erdos himself)? And what's funny too is it did it in some hilariously short period of time where a human would have spent 60 years learning logic and formalisms to try to figure that out (if even possible for a human to do)? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952665) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2026 11:22 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Victimless crimes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952678) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:06 AM Author: Rusted fiercely-loyal elastic band nibblets You need your hands cut off like a rubber thief in the Congo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952893) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:34 AM Author: sinister comical parlor HOT TAKE ALERT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49952903) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 2:15 PM Author: Wine community account roommate i think ai is a big deal but your op is incomprehensible (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49953459) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 6:41 PM Author: Mahogany internal respiration I studied OP for a few minutes, and concluded that he means that "AI" is going to add 10-20 IQ points to everyone who AI-maxes.
He really should have used AI to help level-up the IQ of his OP. |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 6:46 PM Author: titillating theater wtf where are you getting that? can't tell if you're srs.
he's saying: - you only need 130 IQ for AI to boost your capabilities to supergenius level - he's never encountered anyone who thinks AI is NBD and has an IQ over 100
obviously the second is an exaggeration and he walks it back downthread @ http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2#49952891
you guys must have scored poorly on RC |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 7:07 PM Author: Mahogany internal respiration This will change EVERYTHING. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49953938) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 7:11 PM Author: titillating theater must have scored poorly on LR too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49953940) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 7:57 PM Author: Mahogany internal respiration Try to use Opus 4.8 to make a 150-IQ post in your next response. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49954026) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 8:38 AM Author: titillating theater aw, are you implying my IQ is 130+? 😊 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957649) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2026 5:22 PM Author: Sick sandwich hominid (SOXL investor) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49953716) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 9:48 AM Author: Startled main people giraffe the funny thing is the *good* fallout of AI is what xo poas are rightfully scared of. it is going to absolutely obliterate post-WWII style striver careers, and especially if you have kids you will have to teach them how to actually think for themselves instead of just doing what you did and follow a path to easy wagie $$. but on the whole this will be a significant net positive for society
the negative aspect is that it's going to make us all retarded and lazy of course. to the extent it's already relatively uncommon these days, fewer people will know how to actually do something on their own. there will be far fewer artists and creatives. general literacy and quality of discourse will fall off a cliff. etc. |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 10:32 AM Author: Very tactful flesh partner plaza This thread is low IQ. No one actually thinks that except for maybe EPAH but even he is probably just doing shtick. Your thread is just "AI is a big deal" but you can't make a thread like that because it's too banal and would get no traction so you phrase it this stupid strawman way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957824) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:37 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Every major platform with dorks on the internet is filled with people sneering at AI, saying it isn't actual intelligence, and totally can't do whatever type of thinking they are good at yet. And I never even see any pushback about it, it's all circlejerks and phatic reinforcement. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957941) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:41 AM Author: irate marvelous church building It's really good at coding and eliminates white collar jobs. It's a 180 business development. It's no different than if Toyota discovered a new way to build the Camry for 20% less. That would be a revolutionary innovation. But no one would claim that a car production innovation made them personally smarter. That's why AI people are so snooty and everyone hates them. Somebody uncovered a gimmicky tool to make more money and you have to put up with midwits bloviating about how it's turned them into Albert Einstein. You're one of them. I say this as a yuge NVDA whale who bought in at 175. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957954) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:58 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit I never said it "turned me into Albert Einstein". That completely misconstrues my point. I'm saying that it's a big deal, because if you give virtually everyone the power to write software and manipulate computers in a way that previously took a team of mit researchers months to do, then that's completely changing the landscape of what can be done. If a single slightly above avg intelligence person can do the work of teams of highly skilled 150 iq people then what do you think the effect that is en masse and across even short periods of time. Your toyota analogy shows that you are thinking of "intelligence" as only an internal trait. I'm talking about the effective cogntive throughput of what you can do with whatever tools are available. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957977) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 12:24 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Yeah it's a good investment. It's a buy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958029) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 1:27 PM Author: concupiscible vengeful knife state CD-ROM drives were revolutionary too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958208) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 2:07 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Yeah. I think there is a difference between something that stores information cheaply and something that reasons and writes code and allows you to manipulate computers through natural language. First is important, but second is bigger IMO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958268) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 2:08 PM Author: irate marvelous church building Woah. Mind = blown. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958271) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 2:43 PM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Sounds obvious when stated like that, right? But apparently not everyone agrees. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49958349) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 10:51 AM Author: Razzmatazz Cuckoldry You should all kill yourselves jfc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957862) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2026 4:35 AM Author: Disturbing stain orchestra pit Fair pushback. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49960236) |
|
Date: June 23rd, 2026 11:38 AM Author: Cracking garnet heaven (guy from 2013 hyping google glasses) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49957948) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2026 3:18 AM Author: Confused honey-headed wagecucks headpube Anyone who posted ITT is low IQ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5876063&forum_id=2̃#49960210) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2026 3:27 AM Author: titillating theater I asked Gemini who seems the smartest and dumbest in the thread and the last ones are hilarious (start at #6)
" ### 1. The Penis
* **Rank**: Smartest * **Why**: As the creator of the thread, they consistently steer the conversation toward complex, valid concepts in cognitive technology and computer science [source: 1]. They introduce highly relevant ideas like **convergent strategies** in AI self-preservation and clarify that they are measuring **effective cognitive throughput** rather than just immutable, internal human traits [source: 1]. They successfully defend their arguments against bad analogies and remain level-headed when other posters misinterpret them [source: 1].
### 2. Ape Arrogance
* **Rank**: High Intelligence / Best Logic * **Why**: They demonstrate excellent reading comprehension and serve as the thread’s logic enforcer [source: 1]. They accurately translate the original poster's point for others who struggle to understand it, and call out **RUN LIKE HELL** for moving the goalposts from a technical discussion about mathematical problems to an irrelevant debate about writing novels and starting Fortune 500 companies [source: 1]. They handle philosophical nuances regarding emergent behaviors quite well [source: 1].
### 3. Bow tie niggas always have very strong opinions
* **Rank**: Above Average / Highly Articulate * **Why**: They bring sharp, clear distinctions to the table, separating measurable IQ from other human cognitive elements like artistic intuition and emotional expression [source: 1]. They also accurately pinpoint the conversational flaws of the lower-ranked posters, calling out poor reading comprehension and intellectual sophistry with precision [source: 1].
### 4. gibberish
* **Rank**: Average / Active Participant * **Why**: While they don't necessarily drive the deep philosophical or technical arguments, they actively engage with the core premises of the thread [source: 1]. They accurately track the geopolitical and productivity-related motivations behind global tech investments, even if some of their interjections are relatively simple [source: 1].
### 5. OYT and the Indie Reprieve
* **Rank**: Average to Low * **Why**: They show a heavy dose of cynicism but struggle to grasp how technological disruption shifts economic structures, repeatedly missing the points being made about cognitive scaling and instead defaulting to generic anti-growth/anti-economy talking points [source: 1].
### 6. RUN LIKE HELL
* **Rank**: Low / Poor Logic * **Why**: Despite claiming to have "wordcel skills in spades," they show incredibly poor reading comprehension and logical fallacies throughout the subthread [source: 1]. After making a definitively false claim about AI being bad at solving career-level problems, they continually deflect by bringing up Thomas Pynchon, starting businesses, and Hungarian grammar to avoid admitting they were wrong [source: 1]. When totally backed into a corner by factual counterpoints, they resort to posting "I love men" and admitting they refuse to look at the evidence because it would be a "betrayal of my people" [source: 1].
### 7. Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband (EPAH)
* **Rank**: Dumbest * **Why**: They firmly claim the bottom spot. They completely misunderstand basic tech terminology, trying to use a dismissive tone about LLMs without realizing that advanced reasoning models are actively tackling complex computational benchmarks [source: 1]. Their counterarguments consist entirely of sarcastic strawmen, earning them the title of the thread's resident contrarian who is "just doing shtick" [source: 1]. " |