\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Causal closure of the physical is almost certainly true

...
cowardly sapphire gas station potus
  08/10/26
If you're retarded
Marvelous aqua meetinghouse
  08/10/26
Who the hell questions causal closure of the physical? No se...
cowardly sapphire gas station potus
  08/10/26
You're over claiming
Marvelous aqua meetinghouse
  08/10/26
I'm overclaiming somewhat by saying no serious thinkers. The...
cowardly sapphire gas station potus
  08/10/26
>> Every rigorously tested physical effect has been fu...
Marvelous aqua meetinghouse
  08/10/26
It's a defeasible claim that can always be revised in the fa...
cowardly sapphire gas station potus
  08/10/26
This is just metaphysics
Marvelous aqua meetinghouse
  08/10/26
Yeah it's pretty gay
cowardly sapphire gas station potus
  08/10/26
Yeah The only people who don't believe in it are people l...
Duck-like razzle-dazzle crackhouse
  08/10/26
In his defense religion works and people probably should fol...
cowardly sapphire gas station potus
  08/10/26
i'm gay
opaque base
  08/10/26
...
Marvelous aqua meetinghouse
  08/10/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:03 AM
Author: cowardly sapphire gas station potus



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057332)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:09 AM
Author: Marvelous aqua meetinghouse

If you're retarded

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057346)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:21 AM
Author: cowardly sapphire gas station potus

Who the hell questions causal closure of the physical? No serious thinker or physicist. It's the default assumption in terms of philosophical and scientific consensus. Every rigorously tested physical effect has been fully accounted for by prior physical states and laws. Non-physical causes would produce detectable anomalies or residual variances once all physical variables are controlled. There are none observed. It's the principle that survives contact with experiment and underwrites the predictive success of science. It remains revisable if clean counter-evidence ever arrives, although that is extraordinarily unlikely.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057365)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:22 AM
Author: Marvelous aqua meetinghouse

You're over claiming

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057367)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:28 AM
Author: cowardly sapphire gas station potus

I'm overclaiming somewhat by saying no serious thinkers. There are serious papers written by interactionist dualists and whoever else. Lots of positions are “serious” inside philosophy departments while remaining wildly implausible given the scientific record. Non-physical causation that actually *does* anything is tightly constrained by known physics.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057381)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:34 AM
Author: Marvelous aqua meetinghouse

>> Every rigorously tested physical effect has been fully accounted for by prior physical states and laws.

Also youre confusing an assumption of the paradigm in a period of "normal science" with a metaphysical absolute. Science is a liar sometimes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057396)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:45 AM
Author: cowardly sapphire gas station potus

It's a defeasible claim that can always be revised in the face of new evidence. Empirical evidence normally gives inductive support rather than metaphysical certainty. Paradigms change, but that establishes only a possibility of error. As of now, there is no well-established physical phenomenon for which introducing a nonphysical causal influence is required by the evidence. And this case is not really one that resembles historical failures considering that increasingly successful physical explanations have repeatedly eliminated proposed extra causal agencies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057431)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:48 AM
Author: Marvelous aqua meetinghouse

This is just metaphysics

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057436)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:48 AM
Author: cowardly sapphire gas station potus

Yeah it's pretty gay

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057438)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:32 AM
Author: Duck-like razzle-dazzle crackhouse

Yeah

The only people who don't believe in it are people like mig who desperately want religion to be real even though they know it isn't real

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057388)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:37 AM
Author: cowardly sapphire gas station potus

In his defense religion works and people probably should follow it. And it works better if you fully have faith in the divine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057408)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:36 AM
Author: opaque base

i'm gay

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057404)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 10th, 2026 10:39 AM
Author: Marvelous aqua meetinghouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891331&forum_id=2…id#50057413)