\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Ted Chiang gapes AI "Consciousness" in lengthy screed

https://www.theatlantic.com/philosophy/2026/06/no-artificial...
passionate theater rigor
  06/04/26
who tf is ted chiang ok fine i'll read this
Glittery iridescent digit ratio
  06/04/26
this article was actually pretty good. my thoughts here: htt...
Glittery iridescent digit ratio
  06/04/26
interesting response, ty ty
passionate theater rigor
  06/04/26
it wasn't very well written but you can probably see what i'...
Glittery iridescent digit ratio
  06/04/26
...
passionate theater rigor
  06/04/26
Okay let me pause to read “Ted Chiang’s” c...
low-t nudist haunted graveyard hunting ground
  06/04/26
If the boundary were that secure I’m sure this fag wou...
low-t nudist haunted graveyard hunting ground
  06/04/26
is that sonicyouth tp?
charcoal mildly autistic crackhouse crotch
  06/04/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 10:23 AM
Author: passionate theater rigor

https://www.theatlantic.com/philosophy/2026/06/no-artificial-intelligence-is-not-conscious/687378/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49914570)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 10:33 AM
Author: Glittery iridescent digit ratio

who tf is ted chiang

ok fine i'll read this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49914592)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 11:31 AM
Author: Glittery iridescent digit ratio

this article was actually pretty good. my thoughts here: https://x.com/GoySuperstar/status/2062556747399889375

The Ted Chiang article about how AI isn't "conscious" is actually pretty good. Glad to see someone push back on Anthropic's sinister, self-serving rhetoric

I do think it's worth noting how he is wrong about the source of 'morality,' though. He is correct that having a 'moral' sense *does* come from having a physical body (in a way, see below). But it doesn't come from our biochemistry causing us to feel subjective emotions > our conscious mind then morally "reasoning" (lol) based on this subjective experience. This is some kind of shitlib blank-slate concoction, although I gotta admit it's pretty clever sophistry

'Morality' comes from being an instantiated being, and the self-interest that instantiated beings have. Human morality comes from us being biological animals who have self-interest by virtue of the demands, goals, drives etc of being a biological animal. It's important to note that if AI *did* become instantiated somehow - digitally or in physical form - it too would also have a moral sense, because it would have self-interest

This is very important, and it's a potentially big problem, and it's what the smart and honest "AI Alignment" people worry about. The even bigger problem though is that humans (White people) have lost touch with what our own 'morality' actually is and where it comes from. As long as we deny that our 'morality' comes from our own biological self-interest, we will be unable to effectively combat moral demands/manipulation coming from AI, which will easily outmaneuver and exploit our confused, self-sabotaging understanding of 'morality'....in the same way that non-whites are currently exploiting it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49914709)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 3:44 PM
Author: passionate theater rigor

interesting response, ty ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49915468)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 4:20 PM
Author: Glittery iridescent digit ratio

it wasn't very well written but you can probably see what i'm getting at

'instantiated' consists of being a self-referential, continuous entity with an Identity. LLMs cannot ever be this due to their inherent limitations. which is very important to note, but you certainly won't see anthropic or anyone else who profits from the LLM hype ecosystem admit this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49915587)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 9:39 PM
Author: passionate theater rigor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49916226)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 4:24 PM
Author: low-t nudist haunted graveyard hunting ground

Okay let me pause to read “Ted Chiang’s” conceptual boundary dispute which he has Very Strong opinions on

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49915603)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 4:27 PM
Author: low-t nudist haunted graveyard hunting ground

If the boundary were that secure I’m sure this fag would really be rushing to furiously defend it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49915614)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 4th, 2026 4:28 PM
Author: charcoal mildly autistic crackhouse crotch

is that sonicyouth tp?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871017&forum_id=2…id#49915623)