The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
*thinks Kant had anything new to say*
| splenetic step-uncle's house psychic | 08/10/26 |
| motley yarmulke | 08/10/26 |
| splenetic step-uncle's house psychic | 08/10/26 |
| motley yarmulke | 08/10/26 |
| splenetic step-uncle's house psychic | 08/10/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 10th, 2026 3:18 PM Author: splenetic step-uncle's house psychic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891449&forum_id=2�id.#50058270) |
Date: August 10th, 2026 3:23 PM Author: motley yarmulke I'm sure you understand the critique of pure reason well enough to be making this judgment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891449&forum_id=2�id.#50058278) |
 |
Date: August 10th, 2026 3:24 PM Author: splenetic step-uncle's house psychic I'm sure you've read Descartes and know his biography (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891449&forum_id=2�id.#50058283) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 3:29 PM Author: motley yarmulke Kant is not remotely reducible to Descartes. He was one of the most important precursors, but you are nowhere in the neighborhood of understanding the fundamentals or the problem space if you think Kant is just restating the same ideas. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891449&forum_id=2�id.#50058304) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 4:45 PM Author: splenetic step-uncle's house psychic Kant was obsessed with Descartes. But so was John Locke, who wrote much earlier than Kant. Everyone was obsessed with Descartes for a long time and Kant just happens to be more recent to us in time (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891449&forum_id=2�id.#50058538) |