\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

ChatGPT Just Told Me To Cite An Unpublished Case & Doubled Down

i asked it for a case to cite to support a point. it gives m...
Citrine hominid jewess
  06/01/26
I just opposed an MSJ where defendant cited to multiple unpu...
Dead ruddy depressive
  06/01/26
maybe maybe not, shitlawyers have been citing unpublished ca...
Citrine hominid jewess
  06/01/26
Were they real or hallucinated cases?
Excitant coral theater doctorate
  06/01/26
They were real but why would anyone cite to those? Would ...
Dead ruddy depressive
  06/03/26
...
Citrine hominid jewess
  06/01/26
a grown ass man worrying about this nerd shit is just lol. i...
Sable reading party sandwich
  06/01/26
lol, right? Just cite it and let do. What are they going t...
Filthy nibblets philosopher-king
  06/01/26
good post/moniker synergy
Citrine hominid jewess
  06/01/26
If it's a federal appellate case, then an unpublished opinio...
lilac titillating station gunner
  06/01/26
i give Thomson Reuters good money for books that cite unpubl...
Idiotic mint hall
  06/01/26
ur iq is like 110, MAYBE 115 max ur literally like a woma...
Federal Property
  06/01/26
tell me your subscription plan before I engage you further.
trip menage kitty
  06/03/26
I get crisp F.3d and F.4th citations, but they're totally ma...
Clear Double Fault
  06/03/26
...
Citrine hominid jewess
  06/03/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 3:54 PM
Author: Citrine hominid jewess

i asked it for a case to cite to support a point. it gives me quotes from a case that turns out to be unpublished. (yeah i didnt tell it explicitly not to give me unpublished cases or to warn me, but why isnt this something it's trained on?)

and then decided to call chatgpt out and said: isnt this case unpublished. it responds:

Frankly, I think ____is worth citing anyway—not as authority, but as persuasive support if you're in a ____ brief and want to mention it in a footnote. ____ courts generally prohibit citation of unpublished opinions (_____), so you cannot cite it as authority. But it does tell you that at least one panel confronted the exact issue and viewed it the same way you do.

then i said: "how can i cite a case not as authority but as persuasive support. i think theyre the same"

it replied: You're right. That was imprecise on my part....

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910207)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 3:55 PM
Author: Dead ruddy depressive

I just opposed an MSJ where defendant cited to multiple unpublished cases. Do you think they used GPT also?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910209)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 3:56 PM
Author: Citrine hominid jewess

maybe maybe not, shitlawyers have been citing unpublished cases with incoherent WL/Lexis cites w halford numbers for 20 yrs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910213)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 10:20 PM
Author: Excitant coral theater doctorate

Were they real or hallucinated cases?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910718)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 2:29 AM
Author: Dead ruddy depressive

They were real but why would anyone cite to those?

Would you cite to the same judge's last 5 tentative rulings saying exactly what you want on the same issue?

That would be dumb as fuck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49912355)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 9:03 PM
Author: Citrine hominid jewess



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910639)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 9:44 PM
Author: Sable reading party sandwich

a grown ass man worrying about this nerd shit is just lol. i mean think about it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910665)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 9:48 PM
Author: Filthy nibblets philosopher-king

lol, right? Just cite it and let do. What are they going to do? Pull your pants down at argument?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910670)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 10:15 PM
Author: Citrine hominid jewess

good post/moniker synergy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910710)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 9:50 PM
Author: lilac titillating station gunner

If it's a federal appellate case, then an unpublished opinion still represents the views of three appellate judges. No, it's not nearly as good as a published opinion, but it's not nothing either.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910672)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 9:52 PM
Author: Idiotic mint hall

i give Thomson Reuters good money for books that cite unpublished cases these days



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910675)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2026 10:46 PM
Author: Federal Property

ur iq is like 110, MAYBE 115 max

ur literally like a woman

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49910764)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 2:46 AM
Author: trip menage kitty

tell me your subscription plan before I engage you further.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49912358)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 3:02 AM
Author: Clear Double Fault

I get crisp F.3d and F.4th citations, but they're totally made up. So we're even.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49912360)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 3rd, 2026 7:11 AM
Author: Citrine hominid jewess



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870445&forum_id=2�id.#49912457)