Randy Johnson vs. Greg Maddux
| marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Cobalt abode | 06/07/22 | | Internet-worthy philosopher-king cruise ship | 06/07/22 | | doobsian hyperventilating lay | 06/07/22 | | territorial athletic conference chapel | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | bright razzle-dazzle famous landscape painting quadroon | 06/07/22 | | soul-stirring public bath | 06/07/22 | | vengeful piazza | 06/07/22 | | charismatic home | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | bright razzle-dazzle famous landscape painting quadroon | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | charismatic home | 06/07/22 | | Cobalt abode | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | soul-stirring public bath | 06/07/22 | | hilarious maniacal native | 06/07/22 | | haunting domesticated lodge fat ankles | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | soul-stirring public bath | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | hilarious maniacal native | 06/07/22 | | Zombie-like wonderful space yarmulke | 06/07/22 | | Internet-worthy philosopher-king cruise ship | 06/07/22 | | hilarious maniacal native | 06/07/22 | | soul-stirring public bath | 06/07/22 | | walnut nowag | 06/07/22 | | shimmering senate | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | shimmering senate | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Outnumbered hell | 06/07/22 | | marvelous principal's office | 06/07/22 | | Vivacious bisexual depressive | 06/07/22 | | Yellow Weed Whacker | 06/07/22 | | Garnet karate kitty | 06/07/22 | | Cobalt abode | 06/07/22 | | multi-colored menage becky | 06/07/22 | | shimmering senate | 06/07/22 | | Vivacious bisexual depressive | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | Outnumbered hell | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction | 06/07/22 | | Ricky | 06/04/26 | | Ricky | 06/04/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 7th, 2022 1:05 PM Author: marvelous principal's office
Probably true, but Maddux was still a beast.
JAWS (average of total WAR and peak 7-year WAR) has the two effectively tied at #9 best pitcher of all time. Only two postwar pitchers above them are Rocket and (barely) Seaver.
fWAR ranks them even higher at #4 and #5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642089) |
Date: June 7th, 2022 1:01 PM Author: bright razzle-dazzle famous landscape painting quadroon
Johnson at his best > Maddux at his best
Maddux on a normal day > Johnson on a normal day
For one game you'd want Johnson and that makes him the better in my mind imo
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642053) |
 |
Date: June 7th, 2022 1:23 PM Author: Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction
For a fan: the accumulation of stats v. accumulation of memories
For an owner: the production of value
Between the Mariners and Braves fan bases, who loves Johnson or Maddux more? Braves love their guy more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642225) |
 |
Date: June 7th, 2022 2:03 PM Author: marvelous principal's office
Crushing it during peak steroid ball is a good thing. It's one reason Pedro's 1999 season was so incredible. And it's not like RJ had zero longevity either:
"He led the league in strikeouts in every full season he pitched but one from 1992 to 2004. The one full season he pitched when he did not lead the league in strikeouts? That was 1997. He struck out 291. Roger Clemens struck out 292.
From 1999 to 2002, four seasons, he left the known universe. He went 81-27 with a 2.48 ERA, a 187 ERA+, and he averaged — averaged — 354 strikeouts per season. He won all four Cy Youngs, carried the Arizona Diamondbacks to a World Series title and was named Sports Illustrated’s co-Sportsperson of the Year along with his teammate Curt Schilling.
He did all this from ages 35-38. It’s the greatest four-year run for any late-30s pitcher ever."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642491) |
 |
Date: June 7th, 2022 1:08 PM Author: Cobalt abode
Give your reasons.
I instinctively thought the same, but Johnson's numbers are really, really good. Better winning pct, better ERA+, way more strikeouts, slightly less WAR but slightly more WAA, one more CYA.
I think you can go either way, but I was surprised at how good Johnson's numbers were in retrospect.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642119) |
Date: June 7th, 2022 1:10 PM Author: haunting domesticated lodge fat ankles
They have pretty different careers.
Maddux was dominant early on and then sort of hung around for a bunch of years in his mid-late thirties.
Johnson never really figured it out in his 20s and became dominant in his mid thirties.
Maddux is remembered as a mediocre playoff pitcher, but his ERA is actually lower than Johnson's in the post season.
Maddux's best seasons seem more spectacular than Johnson's, but Johnson's best seasons actually ahve a higher WAR...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642130) |
Date: June 7th, 2022 1:10 PM Author: Honey-headed Cracking Site Dysfunction
This one has become part of Maddux folklore, although it’s not clear whether he was pitching for the Braves or Cubs at the time. As the story goes, Maddux watched a couple of infielder Jose Hernandez’s swings and then noticed he’d made an adjustment in his stance.
“We might have to call an ambulance for the first-base coach,” Maddux said.
On the next pitch, Hernandez ripped a foul ball that hit Dodgers first-base coach John Shelby in the chest.
Hall of Famer John Smoltz said there were four occasions one season when Maddux, sitting in the dugout, said: “This guy is about to hit a foul ball in here.” Three times, the hitter did just that.
Hall of Fame manager Bobby Cox once visited the mound to suggest an intentional walk. According to Cox, Maddux ticked off the next three pitches he would throw and then said: “And on the last one, I'm going to get him to pop up foul to third base."
You can guess the rest.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642131)
|
Date: June 7th, 2022 1:56 PM Author: shimmering senate
Close.
Maddux's absolute prime also kind of got fucked by the strike:
1994: 25 starts, 202.0 IP (8.08 IP/G) 10CG 3 SHO, 1.56 ERA 8.5 bWAR
1995: 28 starts, 1.63 ERA 209.2 IP 10 cg, 3 sho 9.7 bWAR
His absolute peak is definitely underrated b/c of this
I'd say for longevity, it's Maddux
For the best absolute prime ~4-5 years I'd say it's the Big Unit by a hair just b/c of the time he blew up that bird too
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642444) |
Date: June 7th, 2022 2:53 PM Author: Outnumbered hell
Love mad dog, but the big unit might have been the most intimidating pitcher of all time. You just don't 'fear' an 80mph off-speed pitch delivered with the exact same arm motion and speed as the 91mph 4-seam, causing you to swing early and ground out to third.
You fear the really huge, really ugly guy with occasional control issues who flings sidearm fastballs at 102mph and who may resent that your face is too pretty and decide to explode the soft tissue of it like he did to that dove.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44642817) |
Date: June 7th, 2022 4:23 PM Author: Garnet karate kitty
As others have said, they were basically equally valuable on paper. I would have a hard time choosing one or the other. However, a couple arguments for Maddux that others have not mentioned:
He basically never walked anyone. I believe he has the second lowest career walk rate during the live ball, and during his peak, there were a couple seasons where he came close to having more wins than walks, which is completely insane. (And of the walks he did issue, a shockingly high percentage of them were intentional.) No, when you were batting against Maddux, you weren't worried that he would destroy your face the day Johnson destroyed that bird. But I think there also has to be a certain intimidation factor basically knowing that he was not going to walk you and the only way to get on base is to swing the bat.
It's also worth pointing out that he was an 18-time Gold Glove winner, which I believe is still an all-time MLB record. I think part of the reason his pitching numbers were so good wasn't just because he was a great pitcher but also because he was an elite defender once the ball was in play. I don't know if the advanced pitching statistics consider his contributions with his glove in addition to his arm. If not, that gives some additional points to Maddux.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5125679&forum_id=2�id.#44643357) |
|
|